Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, August 20, 2009
The two biggest lies of today (Mr X* "president" & islam) are one - they respect rapetivism & female sexual mutilation!
*The so called "president" is a fake made possible via a dirty Saudi-islam connection. Moreover, how could Hawaii state health director Chiyome Fukino be able to personally inspect Obama's birth certificate in Nov 2008, although it had been destroyed 7 years earlier? And how was FactCheck.org able to have "seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate" around the same time if it was destroyed in 2001? The fact remains, no one knows who he is! Barry Barrack Hussein Dunham Obama Soetoro (or whatever), the double muslim (muslim father & muslim adoptive father) who thinks (or pretends) he is a (black supremacist?!) Christian & blinks the worst sins of islam (after slavery & genocides), i.e. apostasy ban (which denies Obama the right to leave islam), & denies muslim women from loving non-muslim men (if they don't convert to islam)while encouraging muslim men to rape or marry non-muslim women, hides (or lacks) his real (long form) birth certificate & has spent huge amount of money & effort to cover up the fact that he isn't a natural born US citizen as assumed by the constitution. Moreover he has for years deliberately & cunningly abused a hole in the justice system that doesn't demand him to present this paper (a change of the law is under work but will it include a sitting "president"?! Even bin Laden could, in theory, have become "president" of the US by applying this method! And what's the difference, really?! May be bin Laden should have killed fewer civilian muslims than Obama's cruel slaughtering by a hugely escalating war campaign + stealthy & bloody drone attacks against civilians.
Obama's close islamofascist friends & "associates"
Can you tell who is a "moderate muslim" eager to broadcast a positive picture of islam's peacefulness, & who stabbed his divorcing wife at least 9 times & then chopped her head off while she was still alive? OK, I agree, they all look capable of it. Correct answer is the guy to the left who's rewarded by top islamofascists from islam's muslim terror organization CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations - these guys are also busy accusing FBI for offending muslims because FBI has monitored a California mosque that hosts islamic terrorists planning blow up jobs in California). Btw, the British lord Ahmed (who threatened Britain with 10000 street jihadists if Wilders was allowed entrance to Britain) to the right has also accused of murder/manslaughter (this dangerous islamofascist who Catholic Blair rewarded with a lord title, got away with only 3 months in jail because the biased British court "thought" he had just stopped his 20 minute constant SMS session while driving, just seconds before he killed a person!? Btw, Mr X "president's" first call was to the islamofascist Saudi leader whose legal adviser is the Nation of Islam guy at his right ear (same guy who arranged & paid for his Harvard studies) while Ingrid Mattson at his left ear is a wahhabist islamofascist who wants to make islam & Sharia the new constitution of USA!
Islam a millstone around Africa's (& the rest of the world's) neck!
Why don't we hear more abt the Saudi "princess" who escaped Saudi islamofascist Sharia law & was allowed secret refuge in Britain?!
Rapetivism & female sexual mutilation
The muslim Hui came from the Arabian peninsula & Persia mixing & arriving in China shortly after Muhammed had started his islamic genocides. The first Arab islamic delegation met with the Tang Dynasty China in 651 one year after the Arab colonization of Persia. Arab (& some Persian merchants) settled in southeastern China where the beginnings of foot binding can be traced. In 758, the Tang emperor opened up for some 20,000 muslim jihadists against the An Lushan rebellion. These muslim jihadists of course remained in China afterward, settling mainly in the northwest (Gansu & Ningxia). Similarily btw, in 801 the Tibetans allowed some 20,000 Arab and Sogdian muslim jihadists to fight the Nanzhao kingdom in Yunnan, southwestern China. These islamic jihadist allies turned, as always, to be disastrous for girls/women. As everyone with even rudimentary understanding of islam knows, islam lacks everything in itself simply because it's originally based purely on parasitism & nothing else. As a consequence Arabic islam always consumes, transforms & abuses local traditions, culture, science & technology. But the illegitime Mr X "president" not only "respects" Arabic islamofascism but also loves it. In this sense the unconstitutional US "president" is in fact a rapist & accomplice to islam's ongoing crimes.
Origin & continuing of infibulation & foot binding etc
Origin of islam
The islamic Origin of Vikings
No matter how much you muslim girls/women try to "think for yourself" islam rules over you & even tries to punish you if you think you will divorce it!
Klevius comment: In the world's most populated muslim country, Indonesia (where Mr X "president" as an Indonesian citizen with a muslim father went to Koran schools & mosques"), every muslim baby girl is sexually mutilated (having her clitoris partially or totally destroyed) by women. And I can assure you that they aren't happy with it! So why is the sexually mutilated & abused girl on the pic above so happy? Because of the same reason the girls on the site look so happy. Islamic indoctrination! The mutilated girl is happy not to be expelled from her muslim family & happily pays a horrifying price for it. This is called "islamic colonization of the family" in Klevius terminology (compare Angels of Antichrist). The female knights at Worldpulsemagazine.com against sexual mutilation on the other hand, seem to be happy out of happy & pure ignorance abt the origin of the "religion" islam. But their work against islamic atrocities is nonetheless praiseworthy, of course.
ALL TYPES OF CIRCUMCISIONS ARE WRONG & IN FACT DISGUSTING!
Monotheist rapetivism/circumcision started in old Judaism as a means for making enough Jews to conquer neighbouring tribes. However, only with islam did it become perfectly evil as a means for violent conquest by the cock & the sword (search my sites & blogs for more on this).
As a man I can tell you girls/women an open secret (most uncircumcised boys/men already know it) i.e. that my penis sometimes (even without sexual erection) use to temporarily "circumcise" itself, i.e. that the foreskin leaves the corona of the glans bare. I can feel it as an irritation in my pants & usually search for an opportunity to pull the foreskin back while I think with compassion abt you who are circumcised. Moreover, when masturbating I (or someone else) don't need any oil etc, I simply use my foreskin. And when I have intercourse with a not so wet woman (only time I do it is when she insists on it - a curious fact abt female sexuality in itself) I simply spit on my gland. All the myths abt positive effects of circumcision are justifications for the continuing of an ancient culture of rapetivism. Nature is definitely wiser than the angry Jewish God of the chosen people or the confined Arabic Allah & his/hers/its bloodthirsty "messenger" & later "interpreters"!
What is termed Western civilization rests on an inevitable logic of the individual's Negative Human Rights that has sprung out from technology/industrialization (remember that these rights constitute the foundation for human rights & are therefore attacked by not only islamists but also leftists & some liberals). As a consequence even girls/women are counted as equals to boys/men. This, however, stays in absolute opposition to islam which rests on sex segregation/rapetivism (this is why islamic countries have their own Cairo declaration of "human rights" i.e. segregated "rights" for females!). Western civilization has no skin color or religion & because technological advances are inevitable (unless you become a hermit, of course) no one can escape it (see Endarkened Obama & enlightened Ayaan Hirsi Ali).
Arabic islam is pure backwardness glorified with oil money from the Western civilization!
Isn't it sad that only Klevius (so far) really articulates the core problem, sex segregation (see e.g. From Klevius without love)!