Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, July 30, 2009
*A phobia is (according to the politically correct but usually scientifically incorrect Wikipedia) the "excessive, unreasonable desire to avoid the feared subject". That would certainly exclude Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Klevius etc. from the category of "islamophobes", wouldn't it!
The heroine (Ayaan Hirsi Ali - the enlightened) & the coward Chicago gangsta (Mr X "president"** - the endarkened)
Can you tell who is a "moderate muslim" eager to broadcast a positive picture of islam's peacefulness, & who stabbed his divorcing wife at least 9 times & then chopped her head off while she was still alive? OK, I agree, they all look capable of it. Correct answer is the guy to the left who's rewarded by top islamofascists from islam's muslim terror organization CAIR (The Council on American Islamic Relations - these guys are also busy accusing FBI for offending muslims because FBI has monitored a California mosque that hosts islamic terrorists planning blow up jobs in California). Btw, the British lord Ahmed (who threatened Britain with 10000 street jihadists if Wilders was allowed entrance to Britain) to the right has also accused of murder/manslaughter (this dangerous islamofascist who Catholic Blair rewarded with a lord title, got away with only 3 months in jail because the biased British court "thought" he had just stopped his 20 minute constant SMS session while driving, just seconds before he killed a person!? Btw, Mr X "president's" first call was to the islamofascist Saudi leader whose legal adviser is the Nation of Islam guy at his right ear (same guy who arranged & paid for his Harvard studies) while Ingrid Mattson at his left ear is a wahhabist islamofascist leader of American muslims who wants to make islam & Sharia the new constitution of USA!
Islam is a lunatic medieval millstone around Africa's (& the rest of the world's) neck! Islam's infidel racist supremacist ideology has murdered, enslaved & raped hundreds of millions through 1400 yrs! Why do so many pretend not to see & why are islamologists so feeble minded?!
Simply because the bright ones have long since abandoned Islamic illogic, i.e. the stupid (or simply egoistic) idea abt a “god” who is completely (& safely) out of reach yet still somehow manages to justify the “believers” beliefs! This is then embedded in an ideology that is empowered with the usual common moral stuff for the purpose of even more justification. However, what is missing is the very root, the origin of islam, i.e. the original evil formula (infidel racism-slavery-sexist rapetivism- apostasy ban) that made its murderous looting campaign into civilized land successful in the first place. There\s absolutely no alternative explanation to islam’s initial bloody “success”. Today’s “extremist” Islamic jihadism is just a repetition of Mohammed’s original one, & the senseless denying of this dirty historical fact is nothing moré or less than pathetic "faith" laundering.
We are now again heading towards a new dark middle age because of islam. Back then it was islam’s Sharia finance based on slavery parasitism that made it possible, today it’s oil. And Satan & Co sit in Riyadh & fund not only jihadist hate mongering supremacist racism against “infidels” but also “political correctness” triggered by Saudi etc oil money & influence.
Amil Imani: “Our academia leftists even engage in willful misinformation and deception when it suits them. Terms such as “Political Islam,” or “Radical Islam,” for instance, are contributions of our leftist intellengtsia. These terms do not even exist in the native parlance of Islam itself, simply because they are redundant. Even a cursory study of Islam and its charter—the Quran—will clearly reveal that it is a radical political movement. It is the socialist leftists and paid-for-media and politicians who sanitize Islam and misguide the populace by saying that the “real Islam” constitutes the main body of the religion; and, that this main body is non-political and moderate”
Klevius comment: In my Demand for Resources – on the right to be poor (1991) I criticized the academic etc use of references for non-scientific political (or religious) purpose via computerized streamlined non-scientific social “research” packages under the protecting umbrella of peer review. In other words, those the least to trust when it comes to islam’s true nature are the islamologists (regardless if muslims or not).
However, as everyone knows but only Klevius draws the conclusion of, islam is sex segregation in its purest form.
Even feeble minded islamists understand that either their ideology ultimately dies in the swirl of modernity or they have to kill everything else. This is why they are so desperate. It would be fun to look upon their struggle
had it not been for the victims of islam still counting.
Klevius advice to feeble minded islamologists: Either switch career or wait until you drown in the melt water from the medieval iceberg you are sitting on! Globalization is unstoppable as is technology (see e.g. Shinto meets islam).
The ugliness of islam – from its cradle to its grave
Islam is the worst crime ever - & those who support it (except if out of ignorance) are murderers/criminals. The contradiction between the heavily biased & distorted picture of a “good” islam presented in schools etc.
The beauty of islamophobia
Islamophobia rests on the inevitable logic of Negative Human Rights (i.e. not a "local Western point of view"). The inescapable conclusion being the very opposite to the evil medieval Islamic Cairo declaration from 1990) which uphelds totalitarian sex segregation under the cover of women's "responsibilities" (i.e. to submit to rapetivism).
Also cure your ignorance abt what religion is!
The Christian double muslim Mr X
**He (the double muslim - according to islam & no matter what he thinks himself! - Mr X) hides (or lacks) his real (long form) birth certificate & has spent huge amount of money & effort to cover up the fact that he isn't a natural born US citizen. Moreover he has for years deliberately & cunningly abused a hole in the justice system that doesn't demand him to present this paper (a change of the law is under work but will it include a sitting "president"?! Even bin Laden could have become "president" of the US by applying this method! And what's the difference, really?! May be bin Laden should have killed fewer civilian muslims than Obama's cruel slaughtering by a hugely escalating war campaign + stealthy & bloody drone attacks.