Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, August 04, 2009
Don't let yourself be fooled by quantity instead of quality! Most of the stuff written/preached in the name of islam has nothing to do with real islam. Why not? Simply because they blink the origin of islam & hence the real issue namely racism against "infidels"-slavery-deliberate genocides-rapetivism-apostasy ban.
Am I an "islamophobe" when I think a system of belief, islam, is disgusting when it promotes a cancerous illogical belief such as that muslim men can marry non muslim women but not vice versa?! Or that muslims are not allowed to change their "faith"! Both are grave violations against Human Rights.
The violent, sexist & illogical primitive superstition called "monotheism" culminated in islam, the worst crime ever against humanity - now spreading its racist/sexist hate mongering by the help of the House of Saud & its oil money it has got for nothing from the Western technoLOGICAL civilization. These Saudi islamofascists even have the guts to try stopping any criticism of their evil "faith". And they do this through what was meant to protect us from these kind of evil thugs, the UN!
All sophisticated "god"-religions are based on biological sex segregation, i.e. they have at least TWO original gods & the creation is made, not out of nothing as in "monotheisms", but out of what is already existing albeit lifeless (Klevius 1992:21-22)! The incredible stupid & illogical idea abt a "starting point" &/or a "first mover" etc would be complete nonsense were it not for its evil ulterior motive, rapetivism! However, although denying heterosexual creation (a "faith" for germs?!) the "monotheists" have been extremely eager to emphasize cultural sex segregation for the simple reason that males want more sex than females & that by making females into breeding cattle they got a power boost for additional conquest. On this evil path islam has made sex segregation 100% via Sharia & apostasy ban!
What? The Jews! Oh, didn't I mention it? Didn't you know that Christians were Jews believing in Jesus & that muslims were Jews believing in Mohammed?!
"Western" civilization didn't evolve as a result of monotheism(s) but as a "protest" against it & is based on technology & hence is inevitable in every free society. And the reason Europe US Japan etc have been ahead the pack is simply because islam has cursed most of the others. A more successful protest than the one some women tried in the early years of Christianity, when they, tired of being sex slaves, escaped into celibacy. Many of the Western "protesters", however, wanted to still keep half of the monotheist message, i.e cultural sex segregation (see e.g. From Freud to bin Laden & the link to Klevius Psychosocial timeline)!
Africa is a collateral damage caused by islam
Most people still seems alarmingly ignorant of the scoop of islamic slavery. Although they might have heard that islam sanctions slavery they have simultaneously often fallen victims for the heavy islamist propaganda that "islamic slavery was/is a good slavery". Truth being that islamic slavery was the worst of them all, not the least because it was the very backbone of the islamic ideology & that it produced such an enormous quantity of suffering among its victims (remember Klevius poem on the title page of Demand for Resources:... and the forgotten suffering...!
The islamic "faith" belongs to a weird system of belief originating in the old militaristic (& racist) Jewish approach of "a chosen people", the main tools being the sword & rapetivism/circumcision. Islam was a return & extremist extrapolation (through militant success) of this evil formula. Slavery wasn't only sanctioned but the very basis for islamic finance & survival. This is also the reason why islam itself is impotent in technology. As a parasite it has always abused others for itself. What is remarkable is the way many historians today try to turn black to white by making the products of non-islamic civilizations islamic. Of course the scientists in lands occupied by islam had to become muslims, or at least work for islam!
Every Kunta Kinte was abducted & sold by islam!
We already know for sure that many hundred of Millions were abducted, tortured & murdered by islam. So for example, we do know that for every castrated boy captured for to be resold in the islamic slave system of finance, 9 would die because of the castration. We also know that islamic plantation slaves counted in Millions long before the first Millennium!
However, the main body of islamic slavery through 1400 yrs has been slave girls as sex toys for muslim jihadists & as physical & cultural reproducers of islam.
Ausaf Ali: "Qur'an is very particular about and prefers that Muslim men should marry free believing women, as the ideal Islamic society consists of both free Muslims and Muslim slaves. Only when and if a Muslim cannot afford to marry a free Muslim is he or she told to marry a Muslim slave. This is what is counseled in verse 24:25, quoted above. The verse is addressed both to the Muslim man as well as the Muslim society in speaking of marrying "from among those whom your right hands possess." A slave girl is available, as it were, for a cheaper bride price; she also remains the slave of the man who owns her even after her marriage to another Muslim. Of course, the owner does not retain the right to have her service him sexually after her marriage to another Muslim, but he still retains the right to demand any other kind of service. Marriage does not change the status of the slave girl."
The most alluring aspects of evil ideologies is their cover up for their commoners while still keeping enough info open to attract racist & sexist beliefs in their ignorant followers.
So what to do?
Simple, just go back & read the original UN Human Rights Declaration from 1948. The negative part of it, i.e. that every human, incl. females should be free & not tied to sex as they are in islam & the islamic misogynist Cairo declaration from 1990 initiated by the fascists from Saudi Arabia & supported by 57 other islamic states.
But islam has changed someone might think. But the simple answer to this is that islam, due to its original formula incl. racism against infidels, racist sexist & anti-human rights marriage laws (rapetivism), apostasy ban etc., can only "change" out of itself & then there is no islam in any meaningful sense anymore!
Klevius/KLEVUX, your best (& sometimes only) source for social science & anthropology!