How come that the party with most sharia muslim MPs and extreme islamophilic MPs was able to squeeze out so many more seats than its share of votes?
This sharia* muslim MP, Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh, in UK parliament got 56 times more political power than the only islam critical party UKIP. How come?* She has long and murky records of involvement in sharia supporting practices.
And now she's busy steering US politics from her seat in the UK parliament by banning a possible US president from ever entering UK. Why? Because Donald Trump wants to stop muslim jihadis from entering the US, i.e. Trump has said nothing about stopping non-jihadi and non-sharia "muslims" - only making sure that the latter ones don't pass the borders. In other words, as every sane politician believing in Human Rights equality should do. And no, it's absolutely not against the US Constitution. How could it possibly be in accordance with the Constitution to welcome the violation of itself?
The Scottish National Party (SNP) got 56 seats with only 4.7% of the votes while the UK Independence Party (UKIP), came third nationally in terms of votes with 12.6% but only got a single seat.
The Green Party won their highest ever share of the vote with 3.8%