Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

muslims, muslims, muslims, muslims, muslims, muslims, muslims, ...


Klevius question to civilized non-muslims: Who are the most dangerous muslims, the laughable bearded muslim lunatic marionettes shouting Allahu Akbar on the streets of London etc (and their barely or not at all English speaking "wives") - or the fluently English speaking university polished muslim power women (and the muslim husbands behind them) who mingle in the very same Saudi billionaire circles that holds the strings to those street jihad marionettes?

                                     Sayeeda Warsi calling her fellow muslims "idiots"

Are there any other humans out there than muslims?! No, not really worth mentioning, other than in negative wordings, according to BBC (unless, of course, when they support islam and muslims).


Has there ever been a "community" so dis-proportionally exposed in media as muslims? And mostly positive. Whenever muslims do negative acts etc they are excused as "no real muslims" who don't follow "the real (Western) islam".

Has there ever been a "community"

Has there ever been a "community" so dis-proportionally connected to terrorism, hatred (open or covert*) and sexism (fully open) as muslims?

* Albeit quite open if you just check out OIC's sharia declaration in UN. Unfortunately BBC has showed no interest in telling you about it.

Has there ever been a "community" so dis-proportionally defended as muslims?

Has there ever been a "community" so dis-proportionally offended as muslims?

Firstly, muslims were allowed to segregate in "communities", i.e. continuing their medieval Mideastern outdated way of life. Secondly, when these "communities" continued behaving in a medieval (islamic) way they became "offended" and "stigmatized" when criticized for it.


Klevius declares shame on Bolton University for rewarding this islamofascist* (Sayeeda Warsi) and for teaching Human Rights violating sharia

* For sharia (e.g. OIC) and therefore against the most basic of Human Rights.

No matter how polished Human Rights violations are presented - they are still grave Human Rights violations! And no matter how many zeros islamofascist capitalism  rolls out - it's directly connected to Saudi, IS etc islamofascism.

BBC asks this same islamofascist* (Sayeeda Warsi) if the UK government can deport muslims.

* An "islamofascist" is here defined as someone who deliberately supports withholding of women's full Human Rights and who supports a racist hate ideology that considers muslims better than the rest.


Klevius: The muslim mothers to fluently English speaking jihadis didn't necessarily speak English at all in their sharia veil entrapment made possible by allowing sharia islam.


This sharia supporting (i.e. against the most basic of Human Rights) muslim woman who used to call other muslims "idiots" when they criticized her for not following islamic "modesty" rules, now defends the Saudi burqa etc.




When the Egyptian/Turkish OIC caliph stepped down he was replaced by Iyad Madani from the Saudi dictator family.


Sharia finance means complying with sharia - with everything it implies.




BBC has an extremely dis-proportional representation of sharia muslims - and quite opposite policies to the original idea of what BBC should have been, namely an impartial defender of Human Rights in journalistic reporting. As it stands now the only Human Rights BBC seems interested in are the ones protecting anti-Human Rights muslims.


Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo all have anti-Human Rights sharia islam in common.













.

No comments: