Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling critics of islam "islamophobes" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Politicians against the people

Politicians against the people

Rule Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

British militarist neo-colonialism and conflict mongering

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Why is Theresa May excused for her secret ties with Saudi islamofascism?!

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

Euronews/BBC kept for long a low profile about Saudi state terror. Why?

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles/trolls worldwide.

UK PM escapes muslim terror induced by her "close ally", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

Saudi terror, war crimes, sharia - and "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Warning for BBC's faked "news" and support for Human Rights violating Saudi/OIC islamofascism

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

The network that reignited evil Human Rightsphobic sharia islam via al-Saud

Human Rightsphobe Jacob Rees-Mogg and BBC News crack jokes about Germans lacking humour

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

What is "islamophobia"?

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Thursday, February 24, 2005

An intelligent & honest Swedish super-woman got fired while a pedophilia supporter got double state wages and state media comfort!

The way two completely different Swedish women are treated by the Swedish state also exemplifies how Freud, feminism and the social state are intertwined as described in Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship.!

The first woman, Inga-Britt Ahlenius, served as a critical and effective and well-renowned auditor general of Sweden until she was forced out in the cold by the Swedish socialdemocratic government who didn't like her scrutiny of the scandalous waste of tax money (see posting below abt the peculiar Swedish constitution etc). Ms. Ahlenius has now rightly been proposed as a person capable of cleaning up the black trails behind the UNs oil-for-food money. The way the Swedish state officials treated Ms Ahlenius was beyond imagination. It may be noted that her main opponent seems to have been minister of finance, Bo Ringholm, and that the former head of Riksteatern (National Theatre) Thomas Lyrevik assisted by mimicing Bo Ringholm's voice and hence confusing Inga.Britt Ahlenius (Lyrevik had previously worked on the ministry for finance and culture before he was appointed head of the state theatre involved in the notorious case of the family hating pro-left "psychodramatist" Lars Noren and the "Malexander police murderers" who escaped from prison in connection with a play.

The other woman in my example, Susanne Osten, however, is the exact opposite to Inga-Britt Ahlenius. Susanne Osten, who was appointed professor (by the state) at the Dramatiska Institutet in Stockholm, was responsible for the pornographic acts against six year old children described below (February 03, 2005 The Jackson case compared to Swedish state pedophilia). This was of course only the tip of an enormous iceberg consisting of troubled and weird ideas about children and sexuality. She now earns double full time wages from the state and the state radio supports and propagates for her repeatedly! The plattitude "moral panic" is often mentioned and is certainly not applicable to my criticism as you may recognize from the links below.

Susanne Osten (an orphan herself) belongs to a naive and confused culture of rigid sex segregation and psychoanalytic/dynamic unhappy tradition supported by the Swedish "social state" (also see Childless female child psychoanalysts in search for motherhood/femininity). There is in fact little difference between her and the small confused anorexia wanna-be sex segregated fashion models described in The Swedish girl problem. Also take a look at Klevius' Psycho-social timeline for a better understanding of Freud and the Hollywood phenomenon etc!

The basic problem for Susanne Osten and many of the small schoolgirls she and her colleagues and alikes abused is the generational transition of outdated sex segregation described in From Klevius without love. I would have no problem feeling sorry for Susanne's own tragedy if it wasn't for her deliberate sex abuse of children, that she committed by spreading her own "traumatic" sex segregation and detached/confused individuality/loneliness (fertilized by Freudian pseudoscience and feminism) via the Dramatiska Institutet. Susanne, with such a minimal and confused sex segregated knowledge about sex I don't think it's appropriate for you to even try to educate (i.e. in fact abuse) six year old girls!

Because feminism may be defined as (Karen Offen): “Femnism is the name given to a comprehensive critical response to the deliberate and systematic subordination of women as a group by men as a group within a given cultural setting”, this definition completely outrules the critical study of "women as a group" subordinating girls as a group in a sex segregated setting. And because almost all social studies now are supposed to have a "feminist approach" the only chance for a true social scientist to elaborate an unbiased scrutiny on this particular issue is to step aside from feminism (albeit without falling into masculinism either).

Klevius additional comment: Maybe you should, after all, read Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship and Klevius' News Desk to learn more abt Sweden!

Monday, February 21, 2005

Swedish female author can't differ pedophiles from others!

In an interview invited by the Swedish state controlled radio P! (only those politically correct are usually invited) author Katarina Wennstam (who's been quite successful with two rape books) says she feels "uncomfortable" with the fact that no one asked whether the (had just turned 13!) "Motala-girl" (see posting below) maybe wanted to have sex with four Turkish men, while many did so when a 21 year old woman, under heavy influence, had sex (albeit she, like the 13 girl above, didn't know about it) with three Swedish hockey stars.

Klevius' comment: I can't cause I'm puking...

Sunday, February 20, 2005

The Swedish dilemma, Islam, sex segregation and the detached Swedes

Also see the previous posting! Weekly Standard: " 2003 noted that "a few" of the 6-to 10-year-old girls were wearing headscarves. On a visit in January 2005, fully 80 percent were covered in class--only a handful were not."

"Sweden has suddenly become as heavily populated by minorities as any country in Europe. Of 9 million Swedes, roughly 1,080,000 are foreign-born. There are between 800,000 and 900,000 children of immigrants, between 60,000 and 100,000 illegal immigrants, and 40,000 more asylum-seekers awaiting clearance. The percentage of foreign-born is roughly equivalent to the highest percentage of immigrants the United States ever had..."

Klevius’ comment: As it used to be in France but worse. How many Koran bred terror cells are right now flourishing in Sweden? And how many Islamic terrorists will end up in crucial positions in the Swedish society?

"Swedes voted by a narrow margin to enter the European Union in a 1994 referendum held in in the wake of a devastating recession"
Klevius comment: Sweden would never have entered EU in 1994 if it hadn’t been for the propaganda and misleadings from the Swedish state controlled TV (e.g. the total neglecting of presidential candidate and long-term renowned Finnish anti-EU politician Paavo Väyrynen's important visit to Sweden the week before the referendum).

But Swedes have been unwilling to surrender their currency for the euro.
Klevius’ comment: This was because there was a (basically female/male) split within the social-democratic party itself.

The social-democrats have ruled the country totally (with to short exceptions in the 70s and the early 90s) since 1932 and until present. And even before 1932 the social-democrats were main players on the political board in Sweden long before (they strongly prolonged the process of the female vote and they contributed strongly to the 1924 general child protection act that forced the by now world famous writer Astrid “Long-stocking” Lindgren, as a pregnant 18 year old girl to escape the horrifying Swedish orphanages. Sweden had a very cruel system even before, described by Nobel prize winner Harry Martinsson in his self-biography). For a deeper understanding of the Swedish "social state" and how it's connected to Swedish sex segregation, read Angels of Antichrist - social state vs. kinship!

The welfare state is the real women’s trap and this can easily be seen in OECD statistics where Swedish women lag considerably behind in the private sector and in natural sciences.

The Swedish anti-racism that, after the war, spurred out of the Swedes bad conscience has now been turned into a political pro-terrorist tool for confusing immigrants in general with Islam. A development that now has made Sweden a terrorist’s haven as close to an Islamists heaven one can imagine. The bad thing isn’t immigrants but rather the expansionist Islamic Koran schools. Militant Islam (Is there a non-militant Islam?) is based on social exclusion (We and the “infidels”) and sex segregation. Also see From Klevius without love to get a closer look under the hijab!

The fact that immigrants have shown themselves overwhelmingly in favor of European Union membership, both at the ballot box and in opinion polls is rather due to the overall multi-national spreading of Islam and the practical benefits of easiness to connect to other immigrants throughout Europe.

Friday, February 18, 2005

Swedish 100% state monopoly TV accuses Italy for 90% TV monopoly! Pro-terror news and bribed immigration officials. Also PM & wife in bribe scandals.

Swedish state monopoly TV is notorious as an instrument (fed by tax money in general + license fees forced on everyone who possesses a TV-like device) for long term and intense political brainwashing of the Swedes. In praxis it means that one man, PM Göran Persson, dictates (see posts below on the Swedish - lack of - constitution etc) rules what the Swedes will hear/see ("non-state" TV4 got its renewed concession only because it had "behaved correctly").

The most recent example of Swedish state media manipulation is the presentation of the assassination of Lebanon's PM as a work of Israel or USA while almost no one else seems to think so including Muslim journalists. Repeatedly "experts" are brought forward to declare a Swedish pro-terrorist view.

Those of you who think Sweden isn't severely corrupt may stop reading now. The fact that terrorists can buy Swedish citizenship directly from Immigration officials is just the tip of the iceberg as are the following examples. As said before on this blog the Swedish PM is married with the leader of the huge Swedish state monopoly liquide chain Sytembolaget notorious for endless bribe scandals etc. The PM himself has no university degree but now got his doctoral hat as a bribe from a university he "made" by himself, i.e. he "helped" Högskolan (college) in Örebro becoming a university. Needless to say the PM has no other connection to the scientific field (medicine) of the faculty that promoted him. On the contrary Persson wanted to become a priest before he became a socialdemocratic politician...! Read more on Klevius' AIQ net!

Saturday, February 12, 2005

"For the sake of Islam itself its true teachings should not be so clearly expressed"

"Their (Osama Bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi) view of Islam is exactly what Muhammad, Ibn Taymiyya, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Khaldun, and all the greatest Qur’anic commentators, muhaddithin, and theologians in the history of Islam, would have understood and shared. Some Muslims believe that at the moment, Islam is too weak, and therefore, for the sake of Islam itself, the truth of its teachings should not be so clearly expressed, and acted upon."

Klevius comment: This is exactly what I mean with "stealthy" and "creeping" Islam. Compare this Jihadist quote with the "moderate" (i.e. stealthy) below:

"One of the most known and respected Muslim scholars of the 20th century, the late Muhammad Al-Ghazali..." (compare above) The "moderate" (i.e. stealthy) author continues: "Many of the sloppy statements and erroneous conclusions are the result of failing to consult with mainstream Muslim organizations, and neglecting to understand the dynamics within the American Muslim community."

Klevius comment: Yes, right, in other words exactly what the Jihadist in the first quote above meant!

The most dangerous "secret" and racist power of Islam is the idea about "infidels" and unbelievers (i.e. what really makes Islam so exciting for many a lunatic. By being a Muslim I'm a better person than the "infidels", seems to be the weird logic for many). The only option for a "good Muslim" then is to completely and honestly abandon this lunatic and totalitarian basic idea of Islam. See Klevius' definition of religion.

If Bush & Condi got it right, then someone must have got it wrong?

Friday, February 11, 2005

Hamas & terror Islam - Jihad on Fox's “24”, Sharia, Saudi poll, and "infidel" immigrants

Debbie Schlussel the extraordianry (and brave - contrary to the silent ones with Islamic terror blood on their hands) author of the article above has also written about The politically correct Islam support in Hollywood.

The connection between Hamas' charity and terror Islam well exemplifies the stealthy Islamic hybridity that makes Mideast peace efforts so tricky and that has to be acknowledged also on the global scene.

According to a recent poll almost half of all Saudis agreed with bin Laden's ideas but almost none wanted him to lead Saudi-Arabia

Yes, Sharia is very misunderstood in the West. Sharia is much creepier than most think. It's not something trivial that can be adapted to freedom but, on the contrary, the final lock in the Islamic chain of submissions. It's the dead end of the women's liberation movement. No matter how it's confirmed and interpreted in new contexts, the basic line, i.e. absolute and severe Middle -Age sex segregation (see From Freud to bin Laden), remains untouched!

The stealthy connection between "moderate" Islam and terror Islam resembles that of the stealthy connection between chauvinism and feminism (i.e. sex segregation).

Did Bush and Condi get it right after all?

In Sweden an immigrant is synonymous with a Muslim! And if you are a non-Muslim immigrant you can't really claim "racism" etc with the same powerful state back-up as Muslims! You are hence an "infidel" immigrant, aren't you?

Thursday, February 03, 2005

The Jackson case compared to Swedish state pedophilia

Jackson (if sentenced for having "allegedly twice given one boy so much wine he passed out and then touched him in an "inappropriate manner", ABC reports") may face 20 ys in prison for child molestation. But in Sweden, when a girl who just had turned 13 is served laced Coca-Cola and then repeatedly sexually abused/raped by "four men from Mideast" (according to Aftonbladet) they are freed and not even considered pedophiles although three of them were adults and the oldest above 30 (see 27, January 2005 posting below). And what about the child abuse/molestation and pedophilia the Swedish state sponsors itself?

Six year old children in a Swedish school were faced with state supported pornographic material (e.g. about two small girls having oral sex) while they were simultaneously filmed on video. The female professor in charge stated that the acts were committed in "such a loving and caring context"! When later asked to destroy the video the head of the Dramatic Institute Per Lysander first said it was destroyed already but later admitted that it in fact was still in the hands of the adult students who filmed it. The culprits behind the deed including the female professor above (portrayed below) and professor Claes Peter Hellwig at the Dramatic Institute in Stockholm. The Swedish state funded Save the Children organization was also allegedly involved (not surprising at all if you've read As usual parents weren't told anything about the sexual/pornogrphic content of the "experiment" nor was it preceded by any ethical examination. The same institute has also experimented in other schools with nine year old children who have been taught to sit in a dark room listening to pornographic sounds. Others again were urged to utter "four letter words", which were later used by the adult students in a sketch.

This is the most perfect example of what I use to name the Swedish Psycho State. i.e. psychoanalytic state socialism/feminism boosting an inhumane state funded child trading that creates unattached young child criminals and confused adults. The state feminism sponges on sex segregation, i.e. the collected rage/confusion of girls/women who are structurally learned to hide behind sex/sexuality instead of easing up artificial, unnecessary and limiting interpretations of what is considered "womanhood" (see Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs. social state).

The woman responsible for the project is Suzanne Osten, a professor in directing at the Dramatic Institute in Stockholm. She has become a praized (especially by the social state) celebrity by blaming her parents (her mother was a famous critic and mentally ill) in the same way as Alice Miller (see Alice Miller's Psychoanalytic Genosuicide). Hence she has been an eager supporter of taking children from their homes just as she herself had been taken. She also states that "it's perfectly normal" to use the word "knulla" (fuck) when talking with six year old children.

Also see The Psycho-Social Timeline and how Freud created psychoanalysis as a sex segregated science about and for women and, ultimately, as an excuse for his own super sex segregated treatment of his wife.

Swedish program for children are very sexyfied, i.e. they are influenced by sex segregated (mostly) women who want to emphasise a naive and outdated sex/romantic love approach on children. This is because it offers a hiding place for feminine (non-biological) incompetency* (real or imagined - compare feminist concepts of oppression/discrimination) and the only possibility to defend it is to transfer it to children. This is a wellknown fact since Freud's Victorian times when girls were told what was considered "appropriate" sporting etc. for girls so they wouldn't risk their "femininity". Learn more on From Klevius without Love: Sex, friendship and kinship.

Unfortunately many men have followed in this invitation to a more sex segregated world and hence behave in a pseudo-sexist way that excludes/minimizes/distorts open and un-biased non-sexual contacts between the sexes. This is the real backlash of women's (and especially girls') liberation/emancipation. Many men have also welcomed (as in the 60s and 70s) the sexual "neo-liberation", which offers more easy sex for the sex that possesses the majority of sex hormones. But again, consider the important difference between the performance of physical sexual acts and HSA (hetero sexual attraction).