Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, December 03, 2015

UK goes to war against original islam allied with its worst enemy, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (plus some Ottoman fanatic Turks), i.e. the custodian of "this evil ideology"

Sharia muslims are infiltrating all parts of society and as a consequence the dangers for non-sharia muslims increase. BBC could help pointing out this important dividing line between sharia muslims who reject basic Human Rights and non-sharia "muslims" who reject sharia and approve of Human Rights.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo have sharia islam in common - unless of course, Mishal Husain is an apostate and too cowardice to admit it. Or is it too much to ask so called "moderate muslims" to show some courage? After all, it's extremely simple, especially for you Mishal Husain. Just use the so-called* BBC and honestly tell the Brits you are against Human Rights violating muslim sharia - or that you support OIC's (or worse) sharia!

* So called BBC is more Arab, Mideastern and muslim than British both in numbers and in finance. Still, the Brits are the only ones paying compulsory fees and taxes for its islam propaganda. A recent example is when BBC used the notorious CAIR to inform British listeners on the San Bernardino muslim terrorist attack. The muslim family of the mass murderers also turned to CAIR on the day of the slaughter. CAIR is an un-indicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist-funding trial in US' history. Even UAE has designated CAIR a terrorist group. The CAIR press conference was a preemptive shot — to shut down discussion of the true motive behind the islamic attack in San Bernardino: jihad. Top CAIR representatives are pictured on Klevius Obama pic from 2009.

In 2004, Muzzammil Syed Hassan's wife Aasiya prompted him to develop "an American muslim media where muslim kids could grow up feeling really strong about their identity as American muslims. Hassan expressed belief that some moderate muslims could not identify with the extreme stereotypes often depicted in Hollywood productions and said that such muslims "think they are not accurately portrayed" and that "Bridges TV gives American muslims a voice and will depict them in everyday, real life situations. Every day on television we are barraged by stories of a 'a muslim extremist, militant, terrorist, or insurgent,'" Hassan said in the 2004 release. "But the stories that are missing are the countless stories of muslim tolerance, progress, diversity, service and excellence that Bridges TV hopes to tell." The Hassans received an award for this effort from the CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations). However, when Hassan's wife wanted to divorce him his muslim tolerance ended and he stabbed her nine times and beheaded her. It's also in this light Obama's hesitation to describe the San Bernardino attack for what it was should be understood.

BBC doesn't see "sympathy" for the Islamic State among British muslims as evidence enough of anti-British sentiments - yet the  same BBC shares the UK parliament's view that it's totally wrong to accuse anti-war MPs as "sympathizers of terrorism"!

 This islamofascist Saudi ally has now decided to behead Ashraf Fayadh, a Palestinian poet, for the "crime" of being an Atheist.

Klevius: Why are the so-called "anti-fascists" so silent about this?!

And here's an other muslim "ally":

 And here's Daddy himself:

 Erdogan: "It's a crime against humanity to question or criticize islam."

 Klevius: Well, perhaps not "humanity" but rather the Erdogan family and its accomplices who greatly benefit from islam - just as islam was meant to be in the first place - a tool for personal gain on the behalf of islam's victims.


No comments: