Somehow Jimmy Carter now manages to do what no real muslims, incl. their "prophet" Muhammad and their world organization OIC, have ever done - making islam compatible with Human Rights.
Jimmy Carter: The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views."
Klevius: No, now it's the time to challenge Jimmy Carter's extremely dangerous view, i.e. that following Muhammad is ok! "The children of God" for Muhammad following muslims means the the children of Allah, i.e. pure racism and sexism. And the only "respect" Muhammad paid to girls/women was as physical and cultural reproducers of as many muslim males as possible and as sex slaves.
And when it comes to sex apartheid in ALL forms of mainstream islam there is no way to avoid it without killing islam and its "prophet" in the process. This is very clear from the Saudi based and steered OIC declaration on islamic "human rights".
Why is Jimmy Carter defending a racist/sexist "prophet" and his ideology that started by slaughtering all the Jews in Medina.
First the Jews murdered Jesus and then the muslims murdered the Jews - no wonder religion seems to be the problem. Or do you really think that without Judaic religions there would still be the same amount of victims on top of other victims?! In other words, do you, for example, really think the Germans had murdered equally many without Nationalsocialism (aka Nazism)?
The ill-posed approach to why Mideastern slave and slaughtering religions emergedWhen Klevius as a teenager studied the emergence of the weird "first mover" thinking he realized that it was a local, not general, phenomenon among cultures. All Atheist ("pagan", "polytheist" etc), i.e. not "monotheist" cultures (and not contaminated with "monotheisms") avoided this stupid question by asserting an infinite world (see Klevius on Origin of Universe). Whatever was "created" came out of something already existing. The Universe has no boundaries!
Having realized this simple fact Klevius concluded there must be a deliberately racist basis fpr all "monotheisms".
And for you really dumb out there: Although Human Rights consider all humans as equals that doesn't mean that one can't love some people more than others and even hate some people while respecting their basic Human Rights and the law. And dude, yes there are a lot of so called positive Human Rights that have nothing to do to with the negative basic Human Rights we here deal with.