Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

So called British Broadcasting Company (aka BBC) blinks 1400 years of islamic sex slavery - but eagerly jumps on Japanese war crimes similar to those committed by UK, France, US, and others*

* Here's just a brief snapshot from WW2 1944:

General Alphonse Juin before a battle against Germans in WW2 to his (muslim?) soldiers: "For fifty hours you will be the absolute masters of what you will find beyond the enemy. Nobody will punish you for what you will do, nobody will ask you about what you will get up". His Goumiers then raped and assaulted at least 2000 girls/women in a short period of time while also murdering some 800 civilian men.


And today in Britain adherents to the worst sex slavery ideology ever are considered more vulnerable than others - meaning someone raping a muslim will get a harder sentence than a muslim raping a non-muslim!


 

The two evil caliphates and their evil caliphs


The world's biggest* organization, OIC, is muslim - as is the world's main military problem, IS!

* Although UN consists of more nations OIC is much more effective precisely because of its evil anti Human Rights approach which constitutes its main allure for dictators and other scumbags .

 These two evil muslims below right now represent the absolute majority of the world's practicing muslims. They both consider the most basic of Human Rights as "crimes against islam". Yet stating this indisputable fact makes Klevius an "islamophobe"!? So when the British socialist leader Jeremy Corbyn today wanted to say something that everyone in the British Parliament had to agree with him about, he consequently defended his anti war position with the "risk of creating more islamophobia".


al-Saud and al-Baghdadi



 So called British Broadcasting Company (aka BBC)  makes a huge number of Japanese soldiers in WW2 using "comfort women". Compare this to islam's 1400 years of sex slavery that so called BBC has never seriously addressed!

However, so called British Broadcasting Company (aka BBC ) makes no number at all about the world's by far worst and longest lasting sex slave nation, the Umma of islam. And this despite, or perhaps because, the so calle "British" Broad Casting Company is now anchored in the very center of islam, i.e. Mideast.

Underlying so called BBC's judgmental campaign against Japanese is not only a deep racist attitude against everything Japanese but perhaps even more so so called BBC's poorly hidden efforts to veil islamic atrocities by pointing to something else.

Btw dear reader, how many intellectually high quality independent non political and non religious sources do you really possess except for Klevius?




 

No comments: