The violent death connection between the Koran and its compulsory recitation of racist/sexist Human Rightsphobia
This extremist (knowing the Koran by heart, for example) muslim represents Obama in the islamofascist OIC, which openly violates Human Rights and which wants to globally criminalize criticism or "negative attitudes" against islam, the worst racist/sexist hate crime ever against humanity during 1400 years!
Klevius question to his readers: What do you think, would Obama's Special Envoy to the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), Rashad Hussain, who is able of reciting the hole Koran by heart, also had been at risk being murdered if he had failed his Koran lessons and thereby dishonoring his family?
.
Based on this drawing it seems Sara Ege wore an islamic veil in court. However, all photos of her outside court seem to be without a veil.
Muslim Yousef Ali Ege, who was freed from any involvement was proud of his son's "academic advances" in the Koran school but apparently completely unaware of its price, i.e. the continuous long time beating with fists, sticks, hammer etc that accompanied the Koran recitation lessons.
Muslim mother Sara Ege is said to have beaten her son “like a dog” because he was having trouble meeting her goal of memorizing 32 pages of the Koran in a 3-month period. The beatings went on for weeks until he eventually died and then she burned the body at her home in Cardiff, Wales. Sara Ege was found to have beaten Yaseen with fists, sticks, a hammer and to have locked him in a shed because he wasn’t performing as well as wanted.
Both Sara and her husband Yousef had enrolled Yaseen in advanced Hafiz classes at the local mosque where they hoped that Yaseen would memorize the entire Koran.
According to Sara, in an interview, “If he didn’t read it properly I would be very angry – I would hit him.” She admitted hitting the boy, not only with her fists, but with a hammer, a rolling pin and a slipper as well. She even told a doctor, months before the boy’s death that she believed she had been told by Shaitan, the muslim version of the devil.
The muslim father, however, denies any knowledge whatsoever of what was going on, even though he was intimately involved with the process. They took the boy to the mosque before and after school to study and at home, Sara locked the boy in a shed, tied him to a door and forced him to do push-ups as a punishment for not learning quickly enough.
Klevius' question: If she was so angry how angry was her muslim husband who she had to obey under Sharia? As repeatedly pointed out by Klevius, a muslim woman's duty is not only to offer sex on demand but also to foster new muslims disrepecting Human Rights (i.e. what Klevius terms 'rapetivism'). Moreover, due to muslim 'sensitivities' these kind of Human Rights violating activities are blinked to an extent that includes the most horrifying of crimes.
Islam is a patriarchal
Klevius' puzzle of the day: Did islam have anything to do with 9/11, green on blue attacks, the murder of this boy etc. cases influenced by islam?
Here a collection of reporting around this tragedy
Both Sara and her husband Yousef had enrolled Yaseen in advanced Hafiz classes at the local mosque where they hoped that Yaseen would memorize the entire Koran.
According to Sara, in an interview, “If he didn’t read it properly I would be very angry – I would hit him.” She admitted hitting the boy, not only with her fists, but with a hammer, a rolling pin and a slipper as well. She even told a doctor, months before the boy’s death that she believed she had been told by Shaitan, the muslim version of the devil.
The father, however, denies any knowledge of what was going on, even though he was intimately involved with the process. They took the boy to the mosque before and after school to study and at home, Sara locked the boy in a shed, tied him to a door and forced him to do push-ups as a punishment for not learning quickly enough.
Asked why she had set his body on fire within minutes of his death, she said: "I was too nervous."
She described undressing Yaseen when he collapsed and soiled himself, then dragging him to the kitchen to feed him milk.
The boy was left lying naked on the kitchen floor, still reciting extracts from the Koran, as she poured him the drink.
He then took several sips before being dragged and pushed along a corridor to his bedroom and told to get dressed by his mother.
When he proved incapable, she dressed him herself and left him on a rug by his bed, saying she believed he had fallen asleep.
Ten minutes later, she returned to witness Yaseen shaking and shivering on the floor and gulping a final breath before dying.
"A greenish yellow liquid came from his nose and I saw that he was gone," she said.
Within moments Ege said she decided to burn his body and ran downstairs to get a lighter and a bottle of barbecue gel.
Sara Ege first admitted killing her son in a confession taped by police over several days in July 2010, but later retracted it and blamed her muslim husband, Yousef Ali Ege. He was, however, acquitted from any involvement in their sons death.
Yousef Ali Ege, insisted he knew nothing about seven-year-old Yaseen being hurt and denied he had loved his wife so much that he turned a blind eye to her beating him. “Sir, I did not know anything about these injuries”.
Sara Ege and Yousef Ali Ege married in 2000 in a ceremony arranged by their families.
Sara Ege was accused of and sentenced for repeatedly beating their little boy before eventually causing fatal abdominal injuries in July 2010.
The judge agreed with defense arguments about India-born Sara Ege's state of mind, saying she was "a devoted and loving mother" who suffered from depression and had been a victim of domestic violence.
She later accused her husband of attacking the child and said he forced her to take the blame.
Yousef Ege told the jury:”I never touched him”.
Peter Murphy, beginning his cross examination, said:”I am not suggesting you were responsible for the injuries on July 12 or before [when he had suffered fractures to a wrist, finger and four ribs].
“The purpose of my questions is to consider your position if the jury is satisfied that Yaseen died through an unlawful act by his mother.”
Ege agreed when it was put to him: “You loved your wife very much and thought she was a good and special wife, didn’t you?
“But it was your duty to protect your son no matter how much you loved her”, Mr Murphy said.
Listing the catalogue of injuries, he asked how Ege could not have noticed as school teachers had, that the primary school pupil was “in obvious pain”, “having difficulty sitting down” and “walking like an old man”.
Ege, who at the time was a postman and part time taxi driver said: “Sara looked after him from day one and I was always in work.
“She ....the teachers.... no one told me. Yaseen never complained he was in pain. I thought my son died in the fire. I knew nothing until I was in the police station.”
However, the post mortem examination showed "a catalogue of systematic physical abuse".
The court heard pathologists found multiple injuries on Yaseen's body including broken ribs, a fractured arm and a fractured finger.
In police interviews Sara Ege said she had beaten Yaseen "like a dog" regularly with a stick, but she could not remember if she had beaten him the day he died.
In the interview she said that she went to the kitchen cupboard to get gel for lighting the barbecue, that she poured it and lit it.
"I don't know why I did that," she said. "I knew he was gone and I was trying to protect myself because he had some injuries."
In the interview she went on to describe how she had over a period of about three or four months repeatedly hit Yaseen with a stick.
She said that whenever she stopped there were voices in her head asking her why she had stopped and telling her to go back and hit him some more.
She said the stick was making her evil so she put it in the cellar.
She later gave a different version of events, saying that she had said what she had said because she had been threatened by her taxi driver husband Yousuf Ali Ege and his family.
Mr Murphy said Yousuf Ali Ege must have known about the beatings Yaseen was receiving, as they shared a room because of renovations that were going on in the house.
"This father knew his son was suffering pain and injury and this father did nothing to protect his son," said Mr Murphy.
"The mother was cruel and violent the father knew about the violence.
"He saw the evidence of the catalogue of injuries suffered by his son but did not nothing to stop the pain and suffering received at the hands of his wife."
Sara Ege’s own barrister, Peter Murphy QC, told Cardiff Crown Court that the 32-year-old maths graduate had, through an arranged marriage, moved from a loving and comfortable life with her businessman father and mother in India to the house of strangers in the Welsh capital.
Strangers, he alleged, who subjected her to emotional abuse and domestic violence from the time she arrived in 2000 until her only son, Yaseen Ali Ege, died at the age of a seven, his dead body revealing a catalogue of injuries – a child who had been hit or kicked at least three times to his abdomen in the hours before his death.
Mr Murphy reminded the court of her claims of being treated like a maid by her in-laws in a land where she knew no one.
“It’s very important that the nature of her society and her cultural background is considered,” he said.
“Her marriage wasn’t forced, it was arranged and she married a man she had never met and look what she says she got into.
“Even without domestic violence and emotional abuse do you think she felt isolated – the answer must be yes.
“For her, once married, a woman has no choice – she thought ‘God willing, with patience it will work’ and she wanted it to work.”
The court has heard how Sara Ege suffered two ectopic pregnancies and had IVF treatment to give birth to Yaseen before being diagnosed with an aggressive cancer from which she is now in remission.
Mr Murphy asked: “Yaseen had a catalogue of injuries (including part-healed fractures) but the question is who caused them?”
He reminded the eight women and four men on the jury that they had to be satisfied the prosecution had proved it’s case before convicting her of murder or perverting the course of justice with a fire, charges she denies.
But even if they decide she did snap that day in July 2010, they had to go on to consider her intention and whether she was guilty of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility, not murder.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment