Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Sunday, January 06, 2013

A Saudi supported "dumb untalented bigot" muslim hides his Human Rightsphobia behind "islamophobia" accusations


This creepy guy, who made his first call as a "president" to the Saudi dictator of the world's most intolerant, racist and sexist state, "respects" islam and Sharia. And in doing so he doesn't only spit on the Universal Human Rights Declaration and the US Constitution but also on islam's hundreds of Millions of victims throughout 1400 years.
.


Muslim born apostate (?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) has, so far, together with the Saudi terrorist family managed to murder more than 60,000 muslims in Syria. And he affords to do it by printing money. Because the dollar has functioned as an international currency it has, unlike most other national currencies, been more or less immune to inflation. This is one of two black holes in the the world economy. The other being Obama's belowed social(ist) state (see Angels of Antichrist - the world's most important sociological paper from the last century) which serves itself and its masters rather than the people (No stupid, Klevius isn't and has never been a Christian or any kind of "monotheist").

Klevius political tutorial: If the most disgusting part of the right is religion (which it now seems to share with a changing left) the most disgusting part of the left is its disrespect for the negative Human Rights (i.e. the part that protects the individual against the state). We need redistribution - but not to the state!



According to Syrian media as well as opposition, Obama's pal the Saudi spy chief "prince" Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud has decided to bring the militants fighting the Syrian forces under the umbrella of al-Nusra Front (i.e. Al-Qaeda).

Keep this background in mind while reading the following:


Can a muslim really be this dumb and Human Rightsophobic?! 


This muslim talks like many a muslim terrorist. Yet. he doesn't seem to realize it himself due to the same manipulation of language that has made it possible for islam to be 1) a "religion of peace" while muslim blood is wasted ln the hundreds of thousands just in the last decade to the beat of Allahu Akbar 2) a "faith" encompassing a huge variety of muslims 3) one true islam 4) excluded from certain muslims, especially those who follow the Koran "too closely" and therefore are called "extremist muslims" 5) excluded from certain other muslims, especially those who follow the Koran "too loosely" and therefore are called "secularist muslims" 6) the worst mass-murder/genocide/slavery/rapetivism ideology during the last 1400 yeats.

Or is it because as a muslim he can only chose between apostasy or Saudi money? And by choosing the latter you completely empty your moral and therefore need to compensate by barking nonsense accusations.





Haroon Moghul, a severe case of Human Rightsphobia 


A "dumb untalented bigot" (his own words about Human Rights defenders) muslim, Haroon Moghul: All Muslims are on the hook for what some Muslims do, and must constantly distance themselves from other Muslims—as if the whole must bear responsibility for the acts and faults of individuals. How does that make any sense.

Klevius' intellectual aid to Haroon Moghul and other dumb untalented bigot muslims: Please, let me help you make sense of this. Let's start with one muslim individual named Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu. He eagerly wants to establish a muslim world caliphate based on Human Rights violating Sharia. He leads OIC, all muslims world organization representing 57 member states in UN, which, due to islam's evil history, demands the criminalization of criticism against islam or Sharia. OIC doesn't accept Human Rights, period. So what do you think, Haroon Moghul? Do you bear responsibility for the acts and faults of this individual muslim or do you oppose his world Umma based on Sharia and lacking the most important Human Rights? Do you share his Human Rightsphobia? Or could it be that Haroon Moghul doesn't understand islam, after all?

Haroon Moghul: Only a puny minority of Muslims acts in a violent manner, while the huge majority does not, though both are reading the same book.

Klevius: And I've never heard about the Koran murdering anyone without the help of a believing muslim. This "puny minority of muslims" has since 2000 managed to kill hundreds of thousands of fellow muslims (more than 60,000 just in Syria so far).

Haroon Moghul: Adaptability has been key to islam's endurance over the last 1400 years. It was one-and-a-half centuries before Muslim jurists began systematically to address the two interlinked questions that are central to any legal system: how to decide between two different arguments concerning a rule; and how to resolve cases that are not explicitly covered by clear rules in the first place. In the years since then, countless thousands of scholars have spent their lives struggling to interpret God’s law.

Klevius: This muslim really serves his stupidity on a plate! Is he really that dumb?! Obviously islam couldn't adapt to Human Rights but had to replace them with Sharia precisely because of the universal freedom (especially for women) granted by Human Rights! Moreover, whereas Human Rights constitute a freedom basis for national laws, Sharia always constitutes a confinement. The source of Sharia is a black hole called "god", thus leaving any interpretation/alteration to muslim humans anyway.

Haroon Moghul: For Islamophobes, Muslims don’t have agency.

Klevius: Few muslims were fully aware of the true meaning of the consequences of OIC's Human Rights violating Sharia declaration, especially when it was treacherously called islamic "human rights". In fact it seems it was introduced by high level (secretaries of states) extremists from "a puny minority of muslims" while now including most of the world's muslims.

Clearly Haroon Moghul seems to resolve these challenges posed by reality by dismissing them.



Robert Spencer: The real “Islamophobia industry” is the one for which Haroon Moghul works: the one that is dedicated to intimidating Americans into thinking that it’s “bigoted” to resist jihad and Islamic supremacism. This one has tens of millions more dollars, and a much more coordinated network, than do the foes of jihad and Islamic supremacism. Moghul's claim rests on a Center for American Progress report that conflates money received by "Islamophobic" organizations over a period of ten years to give the impression of a huge sum funding some coordinated machine -- when in fact the aggregate amount was less than the budget of the Center for American Progress for one single year, and was spread among seven quite disparate organizations. In reality, those resisting jihad and Islamic supremacism are few and ill-funded, facing a giant, fabulously wealthy media and propaganda machine of which Moghul is an exponent.


.

 .

No comments: