Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Hey "Africans"! See what an "African" racist idiot wrote.


Another hint to why Human Rights are struggling while racism is on the march again

Today we know with 100% certainty that what could be called truly 'modern humans' did not evolve in Africa but outside Africa


yet

listen to this racist idiocy rant!

Why do khoisan people look asian? (Posted in the African-American Forum)

Afreekan “Beja people=Ancient Egyptians” Level 5

Nerdtician wrote: It's because of their adaptation to their environment that they live. Since they live down south at with low altitudes where they don't receive that much sunlight along with the windy like conditions in the desert (Klevius: They were driven into the desert by intruding Bantus!), that explains why they have yellowish brown skin, flat faces and epicanthic eyelids like Asians (Klevius: Mongoloid Khoisan people is the product of back-migration from Asia - as has been known for more than a decade among researchers) . Ignorant Eurocentrics would say that they got their features from mixing with ancient "Mongoloids" when that is not true.

OK thanks


Klevius comment: "OK thanks" says an other idiot then who obviously just longed for such a racist rant! Would you really believe that there even exist these kind of jokes!  Khoisan are the native modern humans of Africa (which fact Afrocentrists want to hide) but they developed to modern humans outside Africa. All other "Africans" are either later immigrants or hybrids between immigrants and non-modern so called archaic humans. The one above may perhaps be closer to these bi-pedal apes although most researchers think they were extinct.

But it makes one wonder how Klevius would have been interpreted had he been a Siberian with mongoloid features - having in mind the so far overwhelming indicators for a Siberian origin of what we, on the basis of culture and genetics, may consider the birthplace of the first truly modern humans.

The Denisova remains and DNA alone proves that Siberia/Altai was the last station before the undoubtedly modern humans spread over the world. And as that wouldn't be enough we also have, at the very same spot, a wonderful bracelet produced 40,000 years ago with a level of skills that is completely lacking anywhere else in the world at that time. Not only lacking but this bracelet is truly coming out of the blue and therefore, rightly so, even suspicious no matter how well dated. However, the Denisova bracelet also fits perfectly on a line following the protein rich belt from Siberia to Central Europe to the stunning first real human portrait dated to at least 29,000 years old. The much later and much more famous cave paintings in France and Northern Spain just represent the final stage of this development and, interestingly, also the end of this sophistication, which fact just reflects a deterioration of human intelligence due to further hybridization or mixing with archaic Homos. Only with the emergence of intense collective and sedentary domestication (farming etc) were humans, now much more numerous, able again to produce this kind of art although rarely on the same level of sophistication and usually as products of hierarchical power policies of less flattering nature.

Today we are all more or less bastards (see Klevius map of the grey "bastard belt" below) in the meaning that none of those mental capabilities that was the result of a well packed Denisova brain poured over into the enormous skulls of Northern Neanderthals exist anymore.

And we are getting dumber all the time as is truly evident above. There's no return. But technological culture based on science has no borders and is therefore both unstoppable as well as unpredictable.

The reason islam has been the least scientifically* and technologically successful of all ideologies lies in the fact that islam is based on parasitism. And this was also the reason why the Indonesian "anthropologist" Teuku Jakob stole and destroyed much of what could have been important clues to the life of Homo floresiensis, the small ape-like creature that had a brain the size of a chimp's yet managed to produce culture at a level similar to archaic Homos with double that size.

 * well aware of this fact muslim Arabs stole/translated whatever knowledge they could loot from real civilizations so that it could be used by those captured and muslimified to produce profit for the Arab colonizers.

Cure your ignorance by visiting

Out of Africa as bipedal apes and back as global mongoloids

Klevius anthropology blog

 Map updated April 2014

When Klevius predicts that we will see a lot of stunning revelations in the future from the area between Denisova/Altai and Central-Europe, this prediction is nothing to brag about when keeping the above map in mind. 




 This extremely complicated to manufacture stone bracelet was made by the non-human Denisovan/Neandertal hybrid that became the modern humans in Siberia some 40,000 years ago by utilizing a drilling technology, comparable to modern machines, according to the researchers who found it. We know (on the basis of other Neandertal artefacts) that a Neandertal couldn't have done it despite the fact that, in John Hawks words, "they faced and overcame challenges that few people living today can imagine" in the cold and challenging climate in the north. That's why they had evolved the biggest brains ever.


 .







.





.

No comments: