Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Monday, September 17, 2012

The origin of islam - and a continuing desperate history falsification because of its evilness

Slavery, rapetivism, apostasy ban, and robbing the infidels

Koran 9:29: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor forbid that which Allah and his Messenger have forbidden, nor follow the religion of truth [Islam], from the People of the Book [Christians and Jews], until they pay the jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves utterly subdued.

Sadly 99.99% of what you see on the web about the origin of islam is hoax, i.e. based on revisionist texts written by muslim "scholars" long after the alleged Mohammed died. What is left when you remove this hoax is a gaping black historical hole, and the only way to make sense of it is to study its "Schwarzschild radius", i.e. what surrounded it. 

Not everyone has Klevius overview of historical research on the origin of islam, yet almost everyone understands the basics of economy, power, sex etc. However, the majority of islam researchers (and in this group Klevius doesn't qualify any muslim or researcher who uses muslim "belief-texts" - you wouldn't trust a believer in ghosts to research the origin of the belief in ghosts, would you) don't bother putting islam in a context that makes sense , but rather use a microscopic approach (finding something that could be "something" that fits "something") spiced with "sensitivities", politics or just simple academic tunnel vision.

 Islam's evil origin is what makes it so evil even today - i.e. its rigid and fascistic discipline of its orthodoxy that was the basis for submission

 

Islam, i.e the historical phenomenon, was rooted in an eastern Jewish-Christian schism. Jews and Jews believing in (a monophysitism inspired) MHMD (anointed) didn't only offer the wealthy background against which barbaric (according to islam's foremost historian Ibn Khaldun) Bedouin Arabs were enslaved and/or enrolled, but also constituted the missing fift columnist historical link to the "unexplained" success of early islamic terror conquest.

It was islam's brainwashing of infidel racism into the minds of its illiterate jihadists that made it easy to loot, rape and terrorize, i.e. what is usually called "islamic conquest".

Islam is an ideology originating in human slave parasitism. Islamic finance started with slaves as the main currency and capital. The Wall Street of islam was the slave market. For the purpose of defending this immorality, a Jewish* ideology (all the wealthy people in Mohammed's Arabia were Jews incl. those Jews believing in Jesus) was first radically contrasted against Vagina Judaism (matrilinealism changed to patrilineal Penis Judaism, i.e. islam), and then, much later, roughly "finetuned" by Malik's invention of Mohammed and a "Koran" in the interface between the new ideology and the old Book".

A "religious" system based on the reproduction of as many muslims as possible via the Penis instead of the Jewish Vagina, spiced with apostasy ban and the ban on muslim women to marry non-muslim men, and financed by the world's most elaborate and widespread slave finance Sharia, now mainly fueled by Western oil and aid money).

Hugh Kennedy (professor of Arabic language and Arabic history): "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) alleged Mohammed (allegedly dead 632) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever nor any form of religious pronouncement”!

Islam has always abused women* so no surprise it now uses women academically to defend islamic misogynist sex apartheid


* in fact, the abuse of girls/women, i.e. rapetivism or sex apartheid if you like, has always constituted the main pillar of islam.

A Radio Netherlands' pro-islamofascist program seems to be the peak of her islam studies so far. And although she is on the side of the islamofascists she already has had to bow under the same facts as Klevius has pointed out for a decade, hence already also has come under attack from super islamofascists (or whatever they should be called) simply for admitting that islam didn't evolve from nothing.


Petra Sijpesteijn is just one example of how islam supports academics with the right attitude.

This is how she is described by Radio Netherlands:

The study of Arabic papyri is in its infancy.  As far as the work done so far is concerned, the Muslim faithful can set their minds at ease: Dr Sijpesteijn says the texts largely confirm the official Islamic version of events.

Klevius comment: Sorry but we haven't seen anything so far supporting islamic teachings! And believe you me, we wont no matter how many papyri she studies, simply because there were no Arabic papyri around at the crucial time period!

Radio Netherlands: Dr Sijpesteijn distances herself (and got awarded for it) from the small group (sic) of polemical (sic) colleagues, known as the ‘revisionists’ (known by whom?),  who assert that the Prophet Muhammad probably did not exista (to say this fact based on what we know apparently qualify as "polemical revisionism") . They say the Arabic conquerors were actually a disorganised horde of Bedouins who gained control of half the known world more or less by chance. Islam is said to have been dreamt up 200 years later in Iraq.

Klevius comment: The "disorganised horde of Bedouins" was led by very organized Jewish-Christians under the banner of MHMD(s?).

Radio Netherlands: Dr Sijpesteijn says for example that, shortly after Muhammad’s death, there is already mention of a pilgrimage and a tax. She has also come across a papyrus text written around 725 which names both the prophet and Islam.

Klevius comment: Really! Pilgrimage and tax were old inventions and 725 was almost hundred years after the alleged death of Mohammed!?

Radio Netherlands: Even so, her discoveries form a potential threat to the image some modern Muslims have of their history. The papyri contradict the belief held by many of today’s Muslims that Muhammad delivered Islam as a sort of ready-made package. “It looks as though Islam in its first centuries developed a form gradually. There was an awful lot of discussion about precisely what it meant to be a Muslim.”

Klevius comment: There was no original Muhammed in any meaningful sense comparable to the one presented in later islamic fairy tales.



Sijpesteijn also refers to sources (where/what are they?!) from the time of Muhammad (sic) or shortly afterwards, both islamic (sic) and non-islamic.  “In the writings of 12 years after the death of Muhammad, Muslims are referred to as a separate religious group, first using the term muhajiroun, migrants who had left hearth and home.

Klevius comment: Look up 'muhajiroun' on Google and you will find some true muslims and that they are banned! As to Sijpesteijn's "evidence" it may be noted that they are hard to find and that she doesn't seem to be interested in spreading more information about them. She herself seems to have written not a single published book as yet, only a few articles.


Petra Sijpesteijn seems to have got a lot of resources compared to what she has done. But a good and PC approach to islam pays off:  “The Formation of Islam: The View from Below” ERC Starting Independent Researcher Grant 2009-2014

Sijpesteijn's publications

Shaping a Muslim State : The World of a Mid-Eighth-Century Egyptian Official. Oxford University Press. 2012 (this seems actually to be her 2004 PhD thesis and is not available in book form as it looks like after a Google search).

‘Economics of the Umayyad Army,’ in Studies in the Social and Economic History of the Medieval Middle East. Essays in Honour of Avram L. Udovitch, R. Margarati, A. Sabra and P.M. Sijpesteijn, eds. Leiden: E. J. Brill. 2010: 245-268

’Multilingual Archives and Documents in Post-Conquest Egypt,’ in The Multilingual Experience in Egypt, from the Ptolemies to the ‘Abbāsids. A. Papaconstantinou, ed. Burlington: Ashgate. 2010: 105-126

‘A Mid-Eighth-Century Trilingual Tax Demand to a Bawit Monk,’ in A. Boud’hors, J. Clackson and P. M. Sijpesteijn (eds.), The Administration of Monastic Estates in Late Antique and Early Islamic Egypt, American Studies in Papyrology (Oxford 2009: 102-119

‘Arabic Papyri and Islamic Egypt,’ Chapter 20 in R. S. Bagnall (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford University Press. 2009: 452-472

‘Landholding Patterns in Early Islamic Egypt,’ Journal of Agrarian Change 9 (2009): 120-133














 ' .

No comments: