Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Having a muslim father (even if not an active muslim) makes you a muslim - Mr X "president" Obama had two!

No matter what Obama's grandpa did (attending a Catholic school certainly didn't make him a non'muslim) the fact remains that as long as he hadn't been declared an apostate according to Sharia blasphemy law then he was still a muslim when Obama's father was born. The same applies to Obama Sr. and his son muslim born (apostate?) Mr X "president"! This one way evilness of islam is against the very soul of Human Rights and it's cowardice, shameful and disgusting of Obama not to openly admit and face it when thousands are murdered, raped, tortured or just bullied by other muslims around the world while he's hiding behind the walls of the White House and Google's and other media's misrepresentations! 

Blasphemy in Shariah law means insulting, denigrating or defiling anything about the Koran or Muhammad. Depending on the the type of Shariah law, the penalty can be everything from strong social condemnation, 100 lashes, long-term imprisonment or death by beheading. Muslim countries or communities, in fact all muslims in the world Ummah (OIC) have the right to establish Sharia blasphemy laws according to OIC's Cairo declaration. According to totalitarian islam, all non-believers will, in the end, either convert to islam or burn in Hell with the apostates (see Qur’an 9:, 5, 29, 123; 2: 191-193, 216, 3: 56). Allah told Muhammad (a) “O believers take not Jews and Christians as friends since they will not fail to corrupt you. They desire to harm you severely (Sura 3, aya 118); (b) O Prophet! Make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites. Be harsh with them. Their ultimate abode is hell (9:73); (c) “As to those who reject the faith [islam], I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the hereafter." (3:56).

July 26, 2012 Klevius wrote that Mitt Romney is muslim born apostate (?!) "president" Mr X Hussain Obama's 100% guarantee for re-"election".

After islamofascist media takeover every islam/Sharia critical presidential candidate has effectively been removed and now there's only one left - and he's a muslim born apostate(?) who supports OIC and its sharia based islamofascism against Human Rights! Good job Uncle Sam! Four more years of US taxpayers' support for islamofascism worldwide and a continuing eroding of what used to be at the heart of US, namely freedom from totalitarianism and fascism.

OIC and Al-Qaeda share essentially the same goals

How naive can people possibly be in face of the disgusting islam propaganda. Comments on Swedish Aftonbladet's Madonna article "muslim Obama" reveals a bottomless ignorance and a scary belief that "islam is just a personal religion among other religions".

Shireen K. Burki: Remember: Al Qaeda's ultimate goal is to restore the caliphate (the Islamic form of government that would preside over the community of believers) and expand Dar al Islam ("Abode of Islam"). Reaching it requires a long war against all – Muslim and non-Muslim – who don't share its extremist Wahhabi worldview.
.
Klevius:  Saudi based OIC's ultimate goal (according to its Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu) is to restore the caliphate (the Islamic form of government that would preside over the community of believers) and expand Dar al Islam ("Abode of Islam"). Reaching it requires a long war against Human Rights which don't share its extremist Sharia worldview.

The problem with Obama's muslimhood or apostasy isn't his personal belief but islam - and everyone tries to avoid the question

Apostasy (leaving islam) is considered the worst crime in islam - no matter if it's punishable or not in a particular Sharia context or just socially (or by mobsters/jihadists doing the dirty job for the "peaceful" muslims)!

Don't let yourself be cheated by "birther" or "death penalty or not" babblers. What is at the core is islam's incompatibility with Human Rights and the US Constitution. 

 You're quite ready for the madhouse if you stubbornly continue trying to argue that OIC's Cairo declaration on islamic "human rights" (Sharia) could be reconciled with Human Rights. OIC, the world's foremost muslim organization representing 1,5 Billion muslims strongly begs to differ with you, yet you think you know better.
.






Some other voices on apsotasy in islam



Edward N. Luttwak, writing in New York Times 2008:

As the son of the Muslim father, Senator Obama was born a Muslim under Muslim law as it is universally understood. It makes no difference that, as Senator Obama has written, his father said he renounced his religion. Likewise, under Muslim law based on the Koran his mother’s Christian background is irrelevant.
Of course, as most Americans understand it, Senator Obama is not a Muslim. He chose to become a Christian, and indeed has written convincingly to explain how he arrived at his choice and how important his Christian faith is to him.
His conversion, however, was a crime in Muslim eyes; it is “irtidad” or “ridda,” usually translated from the Arabic as “apostasy,” but with connotations of rebellion and treason. Indeed, it is the worst of all crimes that a Muslim can commit, worse than murder (which the victim’s family may choose to forgive).

With few exceptions, the jurists of all Sunni and Shiite schools prescribe execution for all adults who leave the faith not under duress; the recommended punishment is beheading at the hands of a cleric, although in recent years there have been both stonings and hangings. (Some may point to cases in which lesser punishments were ordered — as with some Egyptian intellectuals who have been punished for writings that were construed as apostasy — but those were really instances of supposed heresy, not explicitly declared apostasy as in Senator Obama’s case.)

It is true that the criminal codes in most Muslim countries do not mandate execution for apostasy (although a law doing exactly that is pending before Iran’s Parliament and in two Malaysian states). But as a practical matter, in very few Islamic countries do the governments have sufficient authority to resist demands for the punishment of apostates at the hands of religious authorities.

For example, in Iran in 1994 the intervention of Pope John Paul II and others won a Christian convert a last-minute reprieve, but the man was abducted and killed shortly after his release. Likewise, in 2006 in Afghanistan, a Christian convert had to be declared insane to prevent his execution, and he was still forced to flee to Italy.
Because no government is likely to allow the prosecution of a President Obama — not even those of Iran and Saudi Arabia, the only two countries where Islamic religious courts dominate over secular law — another provision of Muslim law is perhaps more relevant: it prohibits punishment for any Muslim who kills any apostate, and effectively prohibits interference with such a killing.




Following are excerpts from a statement by Sheik ‘Atiyya Muhammad Sa’id, a member of the Sudanese Islamic Scholars Association, at a rally, which was posted on the Internet on May 5, 2011:
Sheik ‘Atiyya Muhammad Sa’id: May Allah have mercy on Osama Bin Laden. May Allah place him along with the righteous and the martyrs, “on whom there shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.” He sought not this world, but the world to come.
[...]
Sheik ‘Atiyya Muhammad Sa’id: By Allah, the state of Islam will be established upon the land, whether the infidels like it or not, whether the Jews like it or not, whether that apostate… What’s his name… The one from America… Obama!
Obama is a Muslim who has left the fold of Islam. Hence, Allah, the angels, and all the people curse him. He is a real apostate. Obama is an apostate. Obama is an apostate. He left the fold of Islam…
Crowds: The apostate must be executed.
The apostate must be executed.
The apostate must be executed.
The apostate must be executed.
Sheik ‘Atiyya Muhammad Sa’id: Oh Muslims, oh the youth of Islam, the path of Osama Bin Laden is our path.
Crowds: Allah Akbar.







 

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Islamic Jihad massacres, as hate crimes en-masse

Every Islamic terror act, anywhere, is a clear cut case of intolerance. It is always against the "other."

True, by Islamic Jihad any infidel targets are fair-game. It's just that some groups are easier targets as "justification" are aided by propaganda, often backed by some radical liberals in the West. Such are many Muslim aggressors posing as "victims," for instance those Arab immigrants ' grandchildren, invaders in Jews' Israel/Palestine who go by the title "Palestinians," while some in the West really buy the notion that these mass-murderers are just about "Palestine-Arab-State," ignoring or unaware of their real ethnic cleansing aims from the entire Holy Land.

Ethno-religious hatred classics:

Arab supremacy --derived from Koran, Koranic spirit and themes-- especially resulting in enslaving Africans and Asians in the Arab world and the genocide in the Sudan (of already 3.5 million, since the 1950s) by a classic combination of Arab racism and Islamic Jihad. The same combination that "founded" the Arab Vs Israel "conflict," by infamous Mufti who collaborated with the ultimate 'racists' the WW2 Hitler/Nazis.

The Armenian Genocide 1915-23, was both: Turkish ethnic supremacy and a overall holy war against Christians. The same goes to Turkish anti-Greek and anti-Assyrian genocide. Totaling a combined 2.7 million Christian victims.

Ethno-Religious Moro-Muslims VS Philippines' natives.

Ethno-Religious Malay-Muslims VS Thai natives.

Ethno-Religious Islamic-Hausa-Fulani VS Igbo Christians in Biafra Nigeria - 1960s-70s (3 million, dead).

Farrakhan's Nation of Islam anti-White racism is deeply woven with radical Islamic vision. So were its linked Zebra murders in the 1970s and the Beltway snipers shootings in 2002.

Ethno-Religious "pure-Muslim" Pakistani VS Bangladeshi (regarded as the impure) genocide - 1971 (3 million dead).

Ethno-Religious "Palestinian" and Lebanese Muslims VS Christian Natives Maronites in Lebanon. 1970s-2000.

Iran-Iraq war - 1980s (a million victims - at least). Racism (Arab supremacy vs Aryan-Iranians) and "we are the true Muslims" motivation, on both sides.

Ethno-Religious Arab-Muslims VS native Coptic-Christians in Egypt, hate crimes still going on...

Ethno-Religious (mostly separated by origin/ethnicity as well) Shiite VS Sunnis, and vice versa in Iraq, Syria, Pakistan. (Bloodshed going on, full force).

Last point but not least: most "conflicts" and bloodshed around the globe today IS correlated to Islamism.