Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, December 08, 2016

What are Theresa May's "British values" really? Sharia rule! Klevius gives May a modern lesson about sharia islam and human suffering caused by it.


Klevius question: How deeply has Britain's worst enemy already infiltrated MI6?

Would you believe it. MI6 says Assad and Russia, who fight desperately against Saudi backed al-Qaeda/al-Nusra and the Islamic State, are responsible if IS attacks UK!


Alex Younger: "hybrid warfare", which included cyber-attacks and subverting democracy, was becoming an "increasingly dangerous phenomenon".

Klevius: Is questioning Saudi war crimes and its support of muslim terrorism "subverting democracy"? Has Boris Johnson "subverted democracy"?

"The risks at stake are profound and represent a fundamental threat to our sovereignty," he said. "They should be a concern to all those who share democratic values."

In his first public speech since taking up the post of "C", he warned of the impact of Russia's alliance with President Bashar al-Assad in Syria in casting all opponents of President Assad as terrorists.

Klevius: Do you mean like casting everyone critical of basic Human Rights violating sharia islam as "islamophobes"?

"I believe the Russian conduct in Syria - allied with that of Assad's discredited regime - will, if they do not change course, provide a tragic example of the perils of forfeiting legitimacy," he said.

"In defining as a terrorist anyone who opposes a brutal regime they alienate precisely that group that has to be onside if the extremists are to be defeated."

He added: "We cannot be safe from the threats that emanate from that land unless the civil war is brought to an end."

The Islamic State group had exploited the situation in Syria to fortify its stronghold in the region and wage a war on the West, he told journalists at MI6 headquarters in London.

Klevius: So if Assad goes then it's the end of serious threats against Brits from muslim terrorists?

Bye bye to Boris - or to the Saudi dictator family? Honestly Brits, are you really proud about this? And which ally is worse: Assad's Russia or May's islamofascist Saudi dictator family whose "state religion" hardly differs from that of the Islamic State?


The woman on the pic wouldn't hesitate to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people with a nuclear strike. However, why does she wear a veil in Britain but not in the homeland of islam?



Not even her own foreign minister shares Theresa May's view on the Saudi dictator family


 which continues to constitute the by far worst threat to the world and the Brits - while bombing and terrorizing its own and neighboring people.

Btw, how many street jihad murders, rapes, assaults etc. muslim terrorist acts around the world could be traced to the Saudi dictator family's activities. Don't ask the police because they might not be very helpful at this.

Nothing can disconnect Saudi hate mongering and terrorist ties from islam

Western (or Western educated) engineers found oil in many countries. However, only one happened to possess Mecca and Medina.

Assad isn't a threat to the world or to the Brits - the Saudi dictator family's islamic hate mongering and support of Sunni (Arabic) terrorists is.

The Saudi dictator family has used islam not only to keep itself in power and gaining wealth, it has also relentlessly used oil money and islam to religiously colonize its Arabic surroundings (which without the Saudis would have developed in a much more modern and moderate (i.e. away from islam) direction. In doing so the Saudi dictator family has utilized inferiority complex and boosted hate against "the West" while itself being extremely Western - in fact fulfilling the worst socialist caricatures of "capitalists". As the icing on the cake the Saudi dictator family then has sponsored and encouraged brutal terror around the world as a means to strengthen its own position as the "guardian of islam".

Does Theresa May think this guy could be "devisive"?

The Saudi dictator family is a bigger threat than Iran, simply because it's not Arabic nor does it possess the "holy places".


Instead, help protect Israel rather than the Saudi dictator family. Islamofascist Iran was just a consequence of the Saudi dictator family (more on this later).

BBC: Syria rebels call for truce to evacuate civilians


The US, Britain, Germany, Italy, France and Canada jointly called for an immediate ceasefire on Wednesday, "to allow the United Nations to get humanitarian assistance to people in eastern Aleppo".

Klevius correction: Islamofascist Sunni terrorists backed by the Saudi dictator family, call for "truce" only to get a better possibility to regroup so they could continue slaughtering civilians while Theresa May and BBC blame Assad and Russia.

The US, Britain, Germany, Italy, France and Canada jointly called for an immediate ceasefire on Wednesday, "to allow al-Qaeda/Islamic State affiliates to get military assistance in eastern Aleppo".

Klevius clarification: Was it not for West's backing of the evil Saudi dictator family's genocide against shia muslims, the war and due suffering in Syria could have ended in no time. But instead Mr X "president" Obomba and politicians allied with him continue fulfilling the Saudi dictator family's appalling strategy of using islam and its jihad terrorists for its own power hunger, well knowing the suffering it causes. Next step for the Saudi dictator family being to help ISIS in Iraq to regroup to Syria for the purpose of continuing the war in Syria. 

So does it have anything to do with islam?


The very question reveals either total ignorance about the origin of islam, or just a deliberate blinking.

Islam would never have succeeded in the first place was it not for its built in racism and sexism. Every serious islam researcher (even British ones) totally agree that it was the simple formula of booty and sex slaves that made the teenage Bedouin fighters interested in "serving" islam - i.e. serving the those who utilized them. And to keep islam reproducing it was necessary to jail the "muslim" women in sharia for the sake of physical and cultural reproduction of male muslims.


Some voices from the British Parliament


The Lib Dems are also accusing Boris Johnson of hypocrisy over Saudi Arabia. This is from Tom Brake, the party’s foreign affairs spokesman.

    For once Boris Johnson is talking sense, but his comments on Saudi’s questionable role in Middle Eastern politics are completely at odds with official government policy.

    This will be a huge embarrassment to May as she returns from her grubby tour of the Gulf, where she did her best to ignore human rights and desperately push trade at all costs.

    The Conservative government rightly condemned Fidel Castro for his human rights record, but have fallen completely silent when it comes to the appalling record of countries they have been cosying up to in the Middle East.

    The hypocrisy is astounding.

Facebook
Twitter
Google plus

12.17pm 12:17
Labour accuses Boris Johnson of 'shabby hypocrisy' over Saudi Arabia

And here’s Emily Thornberry, the shadow foreign secretary, commenting on Boris Johnson’s Saudi intervention. She is accusing him of “shabby hypocrisy”.

    For months, Labour has been arguing that what last year began as a UN-backed attempt to restore the government of Yemen has now descended into a brutal and indiscriminate proxy war, and a desperate humanitarian crisis, with the lives of hundreds of thousands of children at risk.

    That argument has consistently been rejected by Boris Johnson in the House of Commons, but now these remarks in Italy have shown us what he really thinks.

    If that is his genuine view, he needs to explain why he ordered his MPs to vote against Labour’s calls in October to suspend support for the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen, until a lasting ceasefire has been brokered and until alleged violations of international humanitarian law have been properly investigated.

    The government cannot complain about Saudi Arabia’s military actions one minute, then continue selling it the arms to prosecute those actions the next. We need to see some consistent principle in the UK’s foreign policy, not more shabby hypocrisy.




No comments: