Saudi supported Hillary Clinton and her muslim sharia advisor Human Abedin - not to mention Huma's islamofascist mother who teaches sharia in Saudi Arabia - must love this Swedish child convert.
And Swedish social service doesn't lift a finger despite of her parents desperate plea. And why should they? After all, as sharia islam is declared "a great religion", how could it then possibly not be "in the best interest of the child"?
Emma has also said that she doesn't support terrorism.
Klevius comment: Neither does the islamofascist Saudi dictator family. They chop the heads off "terrorists", incl. Human Rights defenders, Atheists, Shia muslims (whom they don't consider real muslims anyway etc.
The evil of true islam and true sharia muslims can easily be made visible through the categories: Original muslims, neo-muslims, and "cultural muslims"*.
* The category 'ignorant muslims' could be found all over the place.
Mishal Husain type of "muslims" helps covering up the true evil of true original parasitic robbing, slaughtering, enslaving and raping jihad islam.
If decent (i.e. civilized, i.e. meaning Human Rights equality supporting) people knew what sharia is, they would condemn it without hesitation.
The legal status of "muslim"* women in India came into focus recently after a women’s group called for a ban on sharia courts. The Muslim Women’s Quest for Equality petitioned the Supreme Court to abolish the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), which oversees the application of muslim sharia in India.
* according to original islamic sex segregation/apartheid, only muslim men can be true muslims. "Muslim" women are seen as an other categoy of humans, defined by sharia "duties" and "obligations", which makes islam in complete opposition to the most basic of Human Rights.
Siobhan Lambert-Hurley is Reader in International History, University of Sheffield: Prevailing interpretations of the sharia in India today — institutionalized in the AIMPLB — allow gender inequality to be justified and upheld in the name of Islam. But Islamic law should not be presumed to be static or unchanging. History points to how more favorable interpretations have been employed to advocate Muslim women’s legal rights in India. In the light of the political controversy that surrounds proposals for the abolition of Muslim personal law in favour a uniform civil code, building on these historical precedents may offer a pragmatic way forward.
Klevius: So why not eliminate islam from the equation and replace it with the 1948 Universal Human Rights Declaration which gives women same rights as men? The inflammation resides in islam - not in Human Rights!