Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

A recorded public time-line of Peter Klevius original insights on human evolution 1992-2012 - and some thoughts about self-citation

Why trust an individual like Peter Klevius more than academic peer constellations? 

Because Klevius is a free individual - and because he (unlike islamists, socialists etc) accepts full Human Rights equality (so called 'negative rights') hence making him immune against bias common among many scientists! And it certainly doesn't hurt that Klevius happens to have an IQ far beyond most professional academics - while also featuring a rock stable mentality combined with no political, religious or academic hindering ties.

Peter Klevius biological father, Olof Kinnmark, was one of Sweden's best chess players (he managed to win the Gothenburg championship over a span of some four decades), and Klevius half-sister (same mother but less intelligent father) managed to top IBM's European IQ test (IQ 167) in their brain hunt in the early days of computing. Klevius mother's two brothers both had engineer as well as economy degrees and had leading occupations in some of Finland's biggest companies.

So..., as Klevius was told after having done the military IQ test (they never gave the actual numbers though): 'If you ever have any difficulties - don't blame your brain for it!' However, that's precisely what Klevius has kept doing ever since by calling himself mentally impaired - meaning it's not always easy to communicate with people of average IQ - not the least because first you have to lower the bar so you can communicate, and when doing so your partner starts easily disrespecting/belittling what you say, and when you explain it a little deeper then they usually get hurt. But to those who really know Klevius he defends himself by pointing to the fact that they have all the time they need to check him out afterwards and possibly correct and embarrass him -, if they can (compare Klevius writings). As a close friend of Klevius used to say: 'I hate when you give up so quickly when you're wrong. That leaves me with too little space to really enjoy my victory. And when I'm proven wrong I can't give up equally quick'.

The photo below was taken after Finland, as the first country in the world, got full* suffrage for women - but long before the US, UK, and most other countries got the same right.  

* Meaning they could also be elected.

Now we have the unbelievable situation that the US not only lacks full equality for women in the Constitution (due to religious prejudices - see the tragic history of the Equal Rights Amendment) but also that US women let themselves be cheated by a sharia supporting crooked money puppet who just happens to have a Vagina. So Trump's alleged kisses and hugs and statements to some women mean more than EVERY woman's right to equality?! Good job done by Saudi sponsored politicians and media - and easily duped US women.

These four Finnish/Finland-Swedish mothers in Klevius maternal line have just buried a fifth.

US women fighting in vain for equality some 70 years after Finnish women got full equality.

Drawing (1979) and photo (2012) by Peter Klevius.

Only stupid or emotionally unstable people need to boast - Klevius is neither. So why does he "boast"? Well, he doesn't, he only boosts info about himself as a service for his readers.

Self-citing is self-advertising, but necessary if important knowledge is kept hidden from the people. However, the real problem is deliberately biased out of focus "research".

The quality of research is determined by how well it keeps its alleged focus. However, scientific "doping" happens within peer constellations and filtered citation lists used to alter the focus while "sharpening" it with misleading academic semantics resulting in more or less nonsense "research" where the "red line" is that very bias it aimed to achive for political, religious or whatever purpose other than science.
Drawing by Peter Klevius

Forgive Klevius for self-citing his book which, btw, warns about citations even in general* (see chapter Science and citations). However, self-citation is neccessary for the people serving under-dog who is declared pariah because of being "islamophobic" (i.e. defending basic Human Rights against sharia islamofascism) and/or not scientifically PC despite more IQ and less bias than main stream science - and most importantly, offering scientific insights that could straighten up many costly research paths. However, as with everything, even science is heavily influenced by personal, religious and/or political bias. Therefore, acknowledging this fact, Klevius main scientific methodology is sniffing bias - even within himself.

* Klevius warned 1992 (pp. 40-44) for automated scientific papers where the coherence lies in deliberate bias based on citation filters rather than scientific research focus (compare drawing above). Unlike nonsense papers produced by SCIgen type programs, citation steered (i.e. academic "cherry picking" for political, religious etc reason)

Please, fact-check Klevius - if you can! Your IQ may be too low for the task, and the originality of Klevius insights (i.e. insights better in line with known facts than main stream academic ones) may seem confusing precisely because of an inevitable lack of other scientists saying the same.
Klevius isn't boasting - just boosting. What some might think is Klevius boasting about himself is in fact the very opposite, namely Klevius criticizing dumb/biased "scientists" sitting in an ivoy tower guarded by prestigious academic dogma, greed and conceit - not to mention peer and citation cartels etc. 

1988 Met with a deserting South African soldier and other people with knowledge about Bushmen (who possess mongoloid features).

1992 Published Demand for Resources (ISBN 9173288411) in which Klevius pointed to Northern Eurasia and mongoloid cold adaptation (incl. the remarcable 280,000 bp Jinniushan in northern China) as the possible source of the evolution of the truly modern humans (meaning the one that clearly differed from its predecessors when it comes to intelligence, i.e. what started that very cultural change we still experience).

2002 Spencer Wells points to Central Asia as the genetic node for M45 (however, Wells continued to propose out of Africa).

2003 Klevius theory of a better packed brain shaped by climatological changes (e.g. up and down through Central Asian channels to the cold but protein/fat rich Siberia - see Klevius old and since 2006 unchanged Out of Africa as pygmies and back as global mongoloids).

2004 Homo floresiensis was announced and gave Klevius a better glimpse of how the packaging actually might had taken place - while other scientists declared it "a sick human" and having a "too small brain" for doing what it did.

2010 Klevius art track map connected the Denisova bracelet (the oldest and most sophisticated known truly modern human achievement) with other Eurasian paleo-art and noted a band from Baycal to the Pyrenees with a new level of sophistication not seen anywhere else in the world, and fitting well into a picture where the truly modern human spread out from northern Eurasia - now with a better packed brain in a bigger skull.

2012 The announcement of the archaic looking Red Deer Cave people (11,500-14,500 bp) existing in Southern China just like the extremely modern looking but much older (70,000-155,000bp) Liujiang skull, long after the birth of the truly modern human (45-50,000 bp?).

2014 The announcement of the hitherto oldest genome (45,000 bp) of a modern human, the Ust-Ishim man in North-western Russia didn't add anything to Klevius understanding. Nor did the announcement of an other Russian find, the 37,000 year old Kostenki 14 found on a place with truly modern human habitation at least 45,000 years ago.

What is called 'anatomically modern human' in biased PC language is in fact nothing more humanlike than what we call Neanderthals when it comes to tool technologies and behavior. In fact, Klevius thinks we have to question the whole early homo/Neanderthal picture and rather see tool technologies and varying grades of "archaic" feature in the light of hybridization from the north instead of from the south. It's actually quite embarrassing how serious looking anthropologists keep telling you that there was a one way grid between Africa and EurAsia that worked 100% for tens of thousands of years - even though the alternative view presented here ticks all the boxes.

Klevius wrote:

Wednesday, July 08, 2015

Skulls and genetics out of east Asia/Siberia and into Europe, Mideast and Africa

Skull development, tools, art, genes, all go in the very opposite direction of what main stream PC science tries to propose in its eagerness to please its own invention*, Afrocentrism.

* An ashamed Klevius admits that he also used to be an Afro-centrist until he realized the awful crypto-racism it contained - back in the 1980s.

And when data don't fit the wanted picture it's called "mysteries". However, the biggest mystery seems to be the axiomatic "Adam" haplogroup A00 which was not created by a god but by biased OOA people.

Most "mysteries" in genetics disappear by abandoning OOA and changing direction of HSS evolution. Only South East Asia offered a combination of tropical island/mainland fluctuations needed to put pressure on size reduction paired with evolutionary isolation in an environment where only those survived who managed to shrink their heads while keeping the same intelligence as their mainland kins with some double the sized brain. Homo floresiensis is evidence that such has happened there.

Early modern human settlement of Europe north of the Alps occurred 43,500 years ago in a cold steppe-type environment long before similarly skilled humans appeared in Mideast.

Kostenki on the Don river in the European part of Russia has layers associated with culturally modern humans underneath the ~40,000 bp Campanian eruption.

The clearly modern human (we have even his DNA) called Ust-Ishim man is ~45,000 bp and found at the Irtysh River near Ural mountains.

Early Ahmarian culture and the Protoaurignacian culture, living in south and west Europe and west Asia around 40,000 years ago used small stone points as tips for hunting weapons like throwing spears, and they appeared in Europe 3,500 years earlier than in the Levant. This is logical if those humans came from the Altai area in Siberia and followed the Mammoth steppe which went all the way to central Europe and never came even close to Mideast.

The oldest HSS skull ever found is from east Asia.

Liujiang HSS, 1567cc, est. 70,000 bp to more than 150,000 bp. Even the lowest possible estimate is far earlier than anything similar in Africa, Mideast or Europe.

Do consider the multitude of techniques in use to blur the physical HSS definition. However, this skull can't be confused with anything from Africa before 70,000 bp.

The Liujiang skull most probably came from sediment dating to 111,000 to 139,000 bp but there is a small chance that it came either from a deposit dating from around 68 000 bp or from one dating to more than 153 000 bp. However, even the loweat est. combined with its very modern shape and size would even then make it the first of its kind.

Early modern human settlement of Europe north of the Alps occurred 43,500 years ago in a cold steppe climate - and 3,500 years earlier than in Mideast.

Some 37,000-42,000 bp Neanderthals in Romania/Europe are supposed to have disappeared. Oase 1 is within the Aurignacian cultural tradition, which was the first wave of modern humans in Europe est. 45,000-35,000 bp. Compare this to the 45,000 bp modern HSS at Ust-ishim in western Siberia, of whom we have a full DNA.

For comparison, Mladeč 1, an early Upper Paleolithic skull from the Czech Republic, dating to around 36,000 bp compared to Manot 1 from Mideast 55,000 bp cranial capacity 1100 cc.

John Hawks: The morphology of the skull is very comparable to those that come from the early Upper Paleolithic of Europe. Its parietal bones bulge outward and upward into distinct bosses, which place its maximum breadth relatively high on the parietal bones, not at the midpoint of the skull as in Neandertals. But like many early Upper Paleolithic crania, it has Neandertal-like features. In the case of Manot 1, the occipital bone projects backward into a bun-like structure and there is a slight erosion of the surface of bone at the cranial rear called a suprainiac fossa.

Oase 2 Romania, 40,000 bp.

Oase 1 from the same site and time as Oase 2, was clearly human but had some 5 to 11 percent of his genome originated from Neanderthals. This individual's Neanderthal ancestry was more recent than that of any modern human tested previously. Some half of its chromosome 12 sequence coincided with Neanderthals rather than modern humans and it had a Neanderthal ancestor within the past four to six generations, pointing to later than anticipated admixture between Neanderthals and the modern human population to which Oase 1 belonged.

Tampa Ling (Laos) skull (TPL1) and jaw (TPL2) est. 46,000-63,000 bp.

Recent discoveries in Laos, a modern human cranium (TPL1) from Tam Pa Ling‘s cave, provided the first evidence for the presence of early modern humans in mainland Southeast Asia by 63-46 ka. In the current study, a complete human mandible representing a second individual, TPL 2, is described using discrete traits and geometric morphometrics with an emphasis on determining its population affinity. The TPL2 mandible has a chin and other discrete traits consistent with early modern humans, but it retains a robust lateral corpus and internal corporal morphology typical of archaic humans across the Old World. The mosaic morphology of TPL2 and the fully modern human morphology of TPL1 suggest that a large range of morphological variation was present in early modern human populations residing in the eastern Eurasia by MIS 3.


 TPL2 has a significantly smaller dental arcade breadth than all modern and archaic samples, including the closely contemporaneous mandible from Tianyuan cave (64.5 mm) or any other East Asian early modern humans (66.4 ± 2.2, n = 5) [29]. The only other Homo fossils that are similarly small in bigonial breadth and dental arcade breadth at the M2 are LB1 (83.0 mm (estimated) and 55.0 mm, respectively) and LB6 (71.0 mm and 53.0 mm, respectively) from Liang Bua, Flores (Homo floresiensis).

Jaw from Tam Pa Ling in the Annamite Mountains, Laos, dating to between 46,000 and 63,000 ybp. Missing teeth mirrored by Klevius.

Niah skull, Sarawak (Malaysia) est. 39,000-45,000 bp.


No comments: