Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Sunday, July 12, 2015

What role have muslim parents in their kids turning into hateful racist supremacist muslims?

Klevius answer: When some 15 years ago kindly stopping for a muslim family waiting to cross the road in a Swedish muslim ghetto, their young son (perhaps 6-8 yr) looked into the car while crossing and showed an expression of utter contempt. The car and Klevius appearance were quite commonplace nor had Klevius ever seen the family or the boy before. Moreover, Klevius had never had any encounters with muslims etc. So the contempt was just a childish reflexion of what his parents thought but didn't show that clearly. You might think that Klevius read into this trivial situation more than it really contained. However, Klevius has a reputation of being extremely good at "reading" people and the context lacked any other reason for the boy to behave as he did. The muslim family incl. the boy gave a wealthy impression.

How many parents of hateful muslim supremacists are themselves hateful muslim supremacists (i.e. what PM Cameron calls "quietly condoning”)?


Muslim supremacist Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and some of his victims.

 He didn't do it! Or perhaps he did!

Mother of the hateful  and racist muslim supremacist brothers who bombed Boston marathon: They didn't do it!

Seifeddine Rezgui, the hateful supremacist muslim who targeted non-muslims on a beach in Tunisia.



Seifeddine Rezgui's Mum: He didn't shoot. He just strolled with his gun. He was brain-washed. I want to know who shot?

Klevius: Could it possibly have been islam? And could the "brainwashing" possibly have come from Saudi Arabia via you?


Mishal Husain: I don't fast during Ramadan, I drink alcohol, and I don't feel my way of life is under any threat. Klevius: True, thanks to Human Rights - not  sharia. But have you ever considered what a spit in the face your comments are against muslim girls/women less protected by Human Rights in places where sharia islam rules?

 
While islamofascism chases Jews and non-muslims, BBC's main muslim presenter drinks alcohol during ramadan and argues, in an extremely bigoted and hypocritical way, that as a muslim she thinks that ‘the emphasis on what you wear on your head or how many times you pray, on the outward things rather than what’s in your heart and the way you treat people, is misguided’.

However. either she is a muslim and thereby has to support Human Rights violating sharia - or she is a lying apostate. There is no such a thing as an individual muslim! Although Mishal Husain as an individual is free to believe whatever she likes, if she calls herself a muslim she automatically connects to sharia islam - e.g. as stated by all the world's muslims' Saudi based and UN sanctioned sharia organization OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) and its islamofascist Saudi Fuhrer Iyad Madani.

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo. Mishal Husain is BBC's top muslim presenter and BBC is the world's leading media. The only thing she needs to say is that she opposes Human Rights violating sharia - and thereby also opposes islam because islam without some form of Human Rights violating sharia is not islam anymore - it's just a private belief and won't bother Klevius a bit.

A consequence of this is that a sharia supporting muslim's vote is undemocratic. OIC's 57 member state voting bloc in UN who supported Human Rights violating sharia as a guidance for muslim legislation was therefore also undemocratic.
 
Yet BBC manages to:

1  Call the world's most intolerant dictator - who even on his death bed asked for more Human Rights violating sharia - a 'cautious reformer'!

2 When interviewing terrorist experts trying to belittle the Saudi connection to the Islamic State (which has a huge support among Saudis) while instead trying to emphasize the Shia threat which has a much less support within Saudi Arabia.

3  Not with a word touching the subject of worldwide Saudi sponsored jihadist hate crimes around the world. "king" Abdullah was the main culprit behind this hate mongering.

4  The fact that his follower is, at least equally keen to violate Human Rights with islamofascist sharia.

5  The fact that the Saudi family steers all muslims world Umma via its Jeddah based OIC organization.


Is it just Klevius who thinks these would have been topics of interest for British license fee paying listeners?

Every true* muslim is a Human Rights violator

* I.e. follower/supporter of OIC's Human Rights violating sharia - or worse.

Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani  - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!

There was never a good Nationalsocialism (aka "Nazism") in Germany. So why should there be a good islam - especially considering that islam is more totalitarian and has committed way more crimes against humanity throughout 1400 years?! Moreover, islam is the only "monotheist" religion that started by slaughtering its Jewish parents.

Nationalsocialist (aka Nazi) Germany, the "guardian of islam" Saudi Arabia and islamist Turkey - no freedom of speech!



Excerpts from OIC's sharia declaration sanctioned by UN


ARTICLE 24:

All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.

ARTICLE 25:
The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration.

Klevius: This declaration is the real muslim/islam problem because it constitutes islam of today. This is also the reason why BBC and its muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain try hard to keep ordinary Brits and others unaware of this disgusting racist/sexist supremacist hate declaration and its connection to Saudi Arabia and the Islamic State via wahhabism/salafism.





.

No comments: