Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Wednesday, July 01, 2015

Neo-muslims vs. supremacist hate muslims


Who are guilty of misinforming about sharia islam? How many victims of muslim supremacist hate crimes could have been avoided with some "islamophobic" warnings?!



 The few muslim women on the beach were easily recognized and avoided by the hateful racist muslim mass murderer who followed the same type of muslim rules as those respected by many politicians in the West. One needs to understand that contempt against "infidels" (such as e.g. not shaking hand etc etc) that is accepted and normalized as "their religion demands it", are just the tip of the hateful racist/sexist supremacist iceberg we know as islam.

Most victims of hateful supremacist muslims weren't naive - they were deliberately misled about the origin and true nature of islamofascist supremacist hate!


 Klevius: Yes, it's perfectly normal. What a pity no one has told you before. Islam is the very essence of ultimate racism! This is why muslims are so sensitive about criticism against islam while showing extreme contempt and insensitivity against others. And this is also why OIC (all muslims world organization) not only have abandoned and even criminalized Human Rights (via UN) but also made it a crime to criticize islam (the worst ideological crime history knows about).

Katie Jemma Gee and her friend were later also thrown acid in their face by some male supremacist muslim haters - most probably connected to the first incident.

Consider that we have possibly millions of such hate crimes going on unreported around the world - often without the victims even knowing or understanding that it was islam that hit them.

The more politicians defend and legitimize sharia islam while spitting on Human Rights, the more it encourages muslim "radicalization"*.

Islam can't be radicalized because it's already radical from scratch!

 Muslims go West to a civilization superior to their sharia based homelands. The pattern is actually quite similar to how muslims some 1400 yrs ago moved to the civilized world with the Koranic hate sword as their ticket. Only difference is that the sword now arrives slightly delayed in comparison. And no, the Islamic State isn't the biggest threat to the West. Saudi based and steered OIC is a much more lethal weapon against Western democracies precisely because it has managed to sneak in Human Rights violating islamic sharia into UN - the organization that was supposed to defend Human Rights. And by doing so the Saudis have also managed to tie up many of Western politicians.


Klevius origin-of-islam equation vs. the peaceful-origin-of-islam equation


Historians are scratching their heads in their effort to understand the seemingly impossible equation of a nice and tolerant "prophet" with a "message" of looting, enslaving and raping, managing to conquer much of the Arabian peninsulain a short period of time. Why? The picture is crispy clear for everyone who is prepared to look. Are they really that stupid? Of course not. It's only when they try to squeeze in the "tolerant" and "peaceful religion" that the equation becomes unsolvable.

Klevius repeats his suggestion of the only solution: Differ between Human Rights violating sharia muslims and neo-muslims (i.e. muslims against sharia and for Human Rights)! If there are any such muslims at all when neo-islam has lost its original evil racist/sexist attraction.




.

No comments: