Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Swedish police after being attacked by muslims throwing fire-bombs against them: "But most projectiles were just rocks"!


Is Sweden's Mona Sahlin finally getting "islamophobic"?


Tensta is one of the main sharia districts in Stockholm. Yesterday when police were called to the area they were met with rocks and molotov-cocktails (glas bottles filled with petrol and corked with a burning rug). One police car was destroyed and hundreds of molotov-cocktails were found.

However, when questioned about it, police spokes-woman Eva Nilsson said: "Reportedly there has been some rocks thrown at the police". When further pressed on the reports of fire-bombs she said: "Yes, it's confirmed - but it was mostly rocks".

Swedish Security Police (SÄPO) is overwhelmed by how big the support is for the Islamic State among Swedish muslims


Anders Thornberg, head of Säpo (Swedish Security Police, i.e. Säkerhetspolisen): If this recruiting to the Islamic State continues we won't make it. It becomes ever more accepted to sympathize with the Islamic State within certain groups. There are disturbing signs of a normalization of the rhetorics of the Islamic State.


The evil ideology that muslim parents transfer to their kids isn't "extremism" - it's islam based on the texts in the Koran and Muhammad's politics of violence!




Mona Sahlin's long road from islamophilia to "islamophobia"


Mona Sahlin, the first female leader of the Swedish Social Democratic Party in 2011 and the first since Claes Tholin in 1907 to leave that position without having served as Prime Minister of Sweden.

Here's what Klevius wrote in 2010:

Mona Sahlin being nice to one of Sweden's most dangerous islamists

Mahmoud Aldebe is the leader of the main muslim organization in Sweden. He is also the guy who called the Swedish (convert) state imam Abd al Haq Kielan (aka Leif Karlson - see Klevius criticism abt him on Naive (or hypocrite & traitor?) top imam denies women a social life outside home) "a Jew who has converted to Islam to destroy for the Muslims" and that he had also called him "Shayṭān" (Satan). Kielan, for his part, accused Aldebe of using undemocratic methods such as "threats, slander and reprisal" against critics. Here Mahmoud Aldebe, an aggressive proponent for Sharia in Sweden, is seen together with his friend Mona Sahlin, the leader of Swedish socialdemocrats.

Mahmoud Jamil al-Debe is the chairman of the Muslim Association of Sweden (Swedish: Sveriges muslimska förbund). He was previously vice chairman of the Muslim Council of Sweden (Swedish: Sveriges muslimska råd), an umbrella organization with the Muslim Association of Sweden as one of its members.

Aldebe was born in Jordan and immigrated to Sweden in the late 1970s together with his wife Ebtisam Aldebe. His wife was a candidate for the Centre Party in the 2006 Swedish parliament elections, but didn't receive enough votes to get a seat.

In 2003, Aldebe wrote a letter of appeal to then Swedish Minister for Justice Thomas Bodström, requesting a new trial for the brothers Rezkar and Dakhaz Atroshi, who were sentenced to life in prison for assisting in the murder of 19-year old Pela Atroshi in Iraqi Kurdistan in 1999. The murder was described by the court as an example of honor killing. In the letter, which Aldebe wrote on behalf of and as vice chairman of the Muslim Council of Sweden, Aldebe claimed that the brothers were innocent and that the verdict was the result of a "conspiracy" involving leading politicians, the police and the media.

In an article published in Expressen on 3 October 2005, Swedish Imam and Muslim convert Abd al Haqq Kielan wrote that Aldebe had approached him and said to him that he was "a Jew who has converted to Islam to destroy for the Muslims" and that he had also called him "Shayṭān" (Satan). Kielan further accused Aldebe of using undemocratic methods such as "threats, slander and reprisal" against critics. In the Swedish Television (Sveriges Television) documentary "The battle for the muslims" (Slaget om muslimerna) Aldebe is accused to being an islamist, intent on giving Islam an official political role in Sweden.


Mona Sahlin and the Islamic State


Previously Mona Sahlin has seemed more concerned with the well-being of the Swedish Islamic State jihadis than with that of the country's peaceful majority.

Magnus Norell, Swedish "terrorism expert": "If you want to increase recruitment for the Islamic State, it's a fantastic idea. The message is that it's okay to behave like his and when you come back, we'll fix you up with jobs, housing and therapy."

Today, however, Mona Sahlin seems to - for the first time - have seen something about the real islam, instead of the naive so called "Euro-islam". But how long will her "islamophobia" last in the politically correct Swedish "islamophilia"?



Mona Sahlin now thinks muslim jihadis should be punished as the crimilnals they really are (Klevius: What about Rohingya, Uyghur etc PC jihadis?). She also now shares the view that even muslims committing genocides ought to be jailed. However, many times it could be hard for the police to establish what returning muslims have done abroad. For that reason they should be under surveillance.

Moreover, according to Mona Sahlin, we see only those muslim jihadis who travel abroad, but we also need to recognize the many muslim jihadis in the tail around (muslim) "extremism" in Sweden. We need to stop talking about (muslim) VIP lanes and instead start talking about ways out of (muslim) extremism because they are not so many.

Klevius: Indeed, actually, there's only one - abandoning islam and its Human Rights violating sharia! Without Islamic State's and Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia islam is nothing! The very lure of islam is its original sins, racism and sexism!

Protected collective (religious or political) evil is the pathway to individual (so called "looners") evil deeds


Klevius: The only path to get rid of islam is to make the individual muslim responsible for what s/he is doing. And the moral guidance ought not be sharia but basic Human Rights (see Negative Human Rights). I.e. the same focusing on the individual as is behind the basic Human Rights. It's by hiding behind collective evilness in the form of "communities", "groups" "ethnicities", "faith" etc. that the individual gets away with her/his evilness. The world is a smörgåsbord (a Swedish word meaning 'buffet table') of (im)moral openings for evil to choose from. Only by recognizing the universal rights of other as well to be free from impositions, works as immunization against evil. This moral code is non-islamic!












.

No comments: