Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Monday, May 18, 2015

Sacrifying a peaceful Human Rights defending Jew rather than disturbing islam


A Jewish woman offends islam by disliking islam's racist hatred and sexism


Her penalty? Punished according to islamic sharia by non-muslim islam appeasers! 




Klevius help to BBC's bottomless helplessness: That must mean that Islamic State is ok as well because between a third to a half of British muslims support IS way or another.

Islamic madrassas seem to be the model. But where did religious extremism evolve? In muslim homes and islamic schools and mosques!

BBC: 150 people in your network protects you from becoming a terrorist. Klevius: Really!




These guys usually have a big social network - especially the muslim Bandidos.

Islamic Women’s Group in UK Defends Islamic State, Predicts Expansion to Western Countries



Muslim UK student on BBC: 99.9% of muslims are ok. Klevius: Are these women ok or do they belong to those 0.1%?

According to so called BBC (who, btw, calls itself BBC), Islamic State "call themselves the Islamic State". However, one day later BBC says: "We call them IS or ISIS"! But BBC's most common naming of the Islamic State is "the so called Islamic State". Does this reflect BBC's confusion about islam?



Edward Stourton, BBC, certainly does his best not to disturb islam.

It seems that protecting islam is more important than protecting its victims.

Is using quantum physics and meteorology to prove the existence of a god really a good idea?


Edward Stourton invites and listens to the most pathetic of "proof of god's existence" - and doesn't react at all. Is he so incredibly stupid or does he just accept whatever nonsense when it goes the "religious way"?!

Astrophysicist and theologian David Wilkinson (whose new book gets promoted by BBC) grapples with the question, how can god "poke his finger" in a deterministic world? And this nut head "answers" it with the insane argument that god can do it through uncertainties. And as examples of uncertainties available to god David Wilkinson refers to the "unpredictability of the quantum world" and meteorology*. However, even a dumb astrophysicist should know by now that there exists no such "uncertainties" that would fit god's poking finger. They are all misunderstandings or just bad thinking from other dumb people. Educate yourself on quantum physics dear Mr Wilkinson. Or ask my teenage son! Or even his pre-teen brother. Or are you simply trying to dupe people who don't happen to possess knowledge about quantum physics! But even they would understand the unreliability of BBC's weather reports without "god's" help.



* Have you noticed how BBC's meteorologists nowadays more and more tend to talk history, i.e. about the weather we already had instead of what's coming ahead. And when they do dare to make a forecast it's longest part is about the coming night which is easiest to predict but of little interest and hardest to control for most people. And when they finally come to the really interesting part BBC's weather clock goes in a couple of seconds full speed over the day under some general mumbling from the meteorologist.

Appeasing evil strengthens evil

Islamic Women’s Group in UK Defends Islamic State


What do Western governments and media think is coming if they appease the jihadis by censoring themselves and pretending that Islam is a religion of peace? Do they think that if they give welfare benefits and preferential treatment to people like these women from Campaign Islam that they will stop supporting the Islamic State and wanting it to expand to Britain and elsewhere in the West? They’re in for a rude surprise.

    “Islamic Women’s Group in UK Defends Islamic State, Predicts Expansion to Western Countries,” by Alyssa Canobbio, Washington Free Beacon, May 13, 2015 1:52 pm

    Aws Al-Jezairy of Vice met with the group of women who run Campaign Islam, a UK-based organization that defends the Islamic State and maintains a strong YouTube presence.

    The group uploads videos of its interruptions of Islam and criticisms of policies, government, and society of the West.

    “The symbol of oppression is not the Muslim woman—it is, in fact, the Western woman,” one of the members of Campaign Islam said in a video from Vice.

    Campaign Islam holds weekly meetings were they discuss life under Islam and the utopian vision of a perfect Islamic State. Umm Dujanah, one of the campaign’s organizers, said she believes that the dream state is in its infancy in both Syria and Iraq. The group draws its teachings from Islamic scholars and talks about every detail down to the measurements of their homes.

    One group attendee said they would have to demolish everything in Britain and start over to achieve this. The comment was met with giggles from Dujanah, who agreed that within the UK but the group did not need to do that because IS would expand into other Western countries.

    As the talk progressed Dujanah discussed non-Muslims that would be in their utopian state that they would have to pay a tax, if non-Muslims did not want to pay the tax they would need to convert or be killed. Dujanah argued giving them a choice.

    Al-Jezairy asked Dujanah about how she knew IS regulations were working, and Dujanah defended the videos and material that IS puts on the Internet, slamming the Western media for creating propaganda against IS.

    Al-Jezairy asked the group if the girls wanted to go to Iraq or Syria to join IS and if they would be disappointed if it was not what they expected. The group said that it would not even have to go anywhere because they know from the evidence from the Sunnah that Islam will prevail over the Earth.

    “We are grateful to live and see one of the great prophecies come true,” said Dujanah.


Klevius question to BBC's Edward Stourton: They are no muslims, right?



.

No comments: