Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Why are you still a muslim?!


The ultimate hypocrisy and bigotry



Anonymous ‘kaddu’: I grew up Muslim. I was a believer the first 26/27 years of my life. The muslim aspects of you aren’t something you can just wash away with a wudhu or two. And there are some aspects that I don’t care to wash away, and some aspects that I even appreciate. And hey! Some of my best friends are Muslim!

Klevius: And not the slightest thought to the fact that by being a "muslim" you contribute to the atrocities dine by true muslims and islam! OIC is the extremist muslim world organization that imposes sharia on your Human Rights.

Anonymous ‘kaddu’: Another factor is the external perception of me. This will remain largely muslim, given where I was born, where I grew up, and how someone who looks like me is seen, etc.

Klevius: Had no idea that muslims had a "look". Here in the free world we are taught that muslims have no general "look". Unless, of course, you masquerade yourself in some attire that is seen by the surroundings as indicating muslimhood.

Anonymous ‘kaddu’: And in this way I’m Muslim when I’m walking down the street, I’m Muslim when I’m on the subway and I’m Muslim when I’m boarding a plane. People aren’t thinking, “oh, there’s a person who once believed but now does not.” They’re thinking, “there goes a muslim.” That is if they’re thinking about it at all. When I’m boarding a plane, they’re probably thinking about it as some level. Given the number of times I get selected for “random” searches, I will assume that they do.

Klevius: Almost sounds as being picked at "random" is a reson for you to pretend to be muslim! Do consider that giving the impression of being a muslim automatically connects you to the islamic "religion". Do you get tax payers money for pretending being a muslim?

Anonymous ‘kaddu’: I could say that there is a cultural association with being “muslim.” This culture is rich and varied.

Klevius: Is it really! Isn't it rather just the traces of islamic atrocities reflected in the non-muslim cultures colonized by parasitic slavery islam.

Anonymous ‘kaddu’: The association to this cultural muslim requires no belief, faith or submission (to Allah or to whoever else). But the word has taken on more meanings, and will continue to do so. Those who submit simply have to deal with that.

Klevius: A disgusting reasoning. Are you a greedy coward who wants to eat the cake while keeping it intact! Klevius grew up in a Christian home in a country with Christian "values" and "culture". However, when Klevius was 14 he realized the utter racist and sexist non sense of the "chosen people" religions, and, without being a Marxist, also realized the non-Christian culture(s) of his homeland.In fact, after his revelation at the mature age of 14 Klevius lived in a country with no Christian culture - without moving out of the physical country! No one would think of German Autobahns as Nazi culture, would they.

Anonymous ‘kaddu’: So with this, the contradiction is no more. I am a non-believing “muslim.” I lack faith, I lack belief, and good lord, I certainly do not submit. But the muslim environment is around me. It still persists and I cannot pretend that it doesn’t.

Klevius: OIC, the Islamic State, muslim sharia racism/sexism etc are all around us, indeed. So why do you contribute to this evil?! 


Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!


First the Jews slaughtered the Canaanites, then they asked the Romans to torture and kill Jesus, and then the muslims started their jihad by slaughtering the Jews in Medina - no wonder religion seems to be the problem.

Religion isn't only the problem, religion is an impossibility in a society based on equality. What you see is a continuous adaptation of religious preaching trying to keep up with its own contradictions revealed by people's insight in the undeniable equality principle of basic  Human Rights. Religion is in fact nothing else than an evil strive to make racist/sexist segregation look good.



Klevius question: Why aren't muslims ashamed of their slave raiding/trading/owning past? And of the Koranic ideology that "justifies" it - instead of excusing islam with cherry picked "new interpretations"


Muslim hypocrisy like the one expressed by BBC's Mishal Husain could be just a laugh - were it not for its connection to islamic evil. Islam has only one authority and that is muslimhood. So declaring yourself a muslim automatically adds to the "democratic" support of islamic evil.


Mishal Husain: “I don’t think my way of life is under any kind of threat."


Klevius: Well, that's because of Western Human Rights rather than islamic sharia, isn't it!



BBC-s sharia presenter Mishal Husain with her islamofascist muslim pals who share almost identical values with the Islamic State.

British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo

The nearest to a global authority of muslimhood is Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC with its global sharia proclamation via UN against that very Human Rights declaration of 1948 that was supposed to protect us against such evil!


OIC Secretary-General Iyad Amin Madani stressed that the "Saudi governing system is based on islam, which fosters values of justice, compassion, equality, and tolerance."

Klevius: These words from this human scumbag must be some of the most hypocritical ever uttered. According to historical facts islam has been the by far worst crime against humanity throughout 1400 years. And today islam's "guardian" Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant of the world's countries and has even criminalized Human Rights.Moreover. the Saudi regime is the hate mongering mastermind behind islamic terror around the world. And while most people point to islamic "scholars" (aka clerics, imams, etc) as the driving force, Mishal Husain asks these muslim "scholars" to contribute even more.

Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports Saudi based OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!  If s/he doesn't then s/he is an apostate (i.e. committing the worst "crime" known to islam) and ought to be welcomed by every non-muslim.


Sharia is the religious password for racism and sexism


Klevius wrote:


Sunday, April 19, 2015

Jewish-muslim cooperation for British sharia islamofascism and a social state feeding itself rather than the broad public


Does it really help Jews to cooperate with the ideology that started with the genocidal slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina?





Ed Miliband is the son of Polish immigrant parents. His mother, Marion Kozak, is a Polish Jew who survived the Holocaust thanks to being protected by Poles. His father, Ralph Miliband, was a Belgian-born Polish Jewish Marxist academic who fled with his father to England during World War II.

Rochdale is notorious for its muslim sex predators abusing white British girls taken into "care" by the social state.

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

UK Liberals promise wage increases to social state parasites


Klevius suggestion to British voters: Demand the parasites out from the public sector before you give the social state access to even more of your tax money! 

Unlike private companies the social state has no protection against internal parasites/parasitism. Whereas private companies have to make profit and hence forced to cut out non-functioning or parasitic elements, the social state has no such pressure. On the contrary it not only lobbies its own legislation. It's also an authority of that legislation while living on an unfounded reputation of doing good just because they themselves call it so. It's like most charities. Overwhelmingly research on the topic shows that the social state doesn't live up to its reputation (read some of Klevius research referred to below).


 The UK Deputy Prime Minister, Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, said public sector workers deserved to know there was "light at the end of the tunnel" following years of pressure on their wages since 2010.

Under the proposals pay would go up in line with CPI inflation until 2017-18, before above-inflation rises in the following two years.

"Despite being asked to make do with less, workers in the public sector have maintained the highest standards and shown great professionalism."

The Lib Dem leader thanked public sector workers, and revealed that £12b was saved as a result of "pay restraint", adding that they had "done their bit to help get the country back on track."

Under the plans, all public sector workers would receive a pay rise.



The disgusting face of the social state


Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending of children. 



However, she seems not very visible on Google News despite the biggest sex slave shock ever in Britain happened under her watch!?

To get a theoretical background to this please read what Klevius wrote some 20 years ago (Angels of Antichrist in the social state - the most important sociological paper written in the last century) and a decade ago (Pathological symbiosis in the social service).

Also consider The Swedish girl problem.

However, what you really should give a serious thought is why Joyce Thacker is defended?


The now reported over 1400 child (young girls "rescued" from their families by the social state) sex slaves taken and abused lately by British muslims is just a tiny glare from the tip of the iceberg. And although it's common and accepted all over the muslim world, in Western countries it's protected under the "islamophobia" slogan.

It's not islam! Really? So muslim jihadists, and muslim sex offenders just happen to follow the text in the Koran and the historical origin of islam in this respect?








.

No comments: