Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, February 20, 2015

Do you really need extremist muslims to fight extremist muslims?


Muslims constitute a couple of percent of US population yet their influence in the White House seems to be a couple of hundred percent!

Is it because their Human Rights violating hateful sharia ideology is so much preferred than the boring equality principle of Human Rights?


Ruby Giuliani: 'The reality is, from all that I can see of this president, all that I’ve heard of him, he apologizes for America, he criticizes America … This is an American president I’ve never seen before.'

And here's US islamofascist representative Rashad Hussain in OIC, the worst scum bag organization the world has seen since the Nazis. Yes, he has memorized the hateful Koran text by heart and is now ready to take over as director of the Center for US Strategic Counterterrorism Communications.

OIC is a muslim extremist organization which openly violates the most basic of Human Rights!

Albert Einstein: 'For me the unaltered Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most primitive superstitions.'

Klevius quiz: Which of the Judaic branches do you think would have been first in line trying to murder Albert Einstein as of today?



Islam is originally built on a foundation of hate and rape - that's why it's so popular among haters and rapers!



The problem today is that original islam was so evil so we aren't really allowed to even mention it anymore because that would disturb the frenetic efforts made to use the "success" of original evil islam to fit a construed non-evil islam while blinking the fact that by doing so you really pave the way for extremist (read evil) original islam. However, this fits open or subtle muslim taqyya (lying for the "infidels" when it promotes islam) or similar strategies.

You need to understand that almost everything you read about islam is written by islamists or their supporters and therefore as far from the truth you can get. Those offering a more truthful analysis are all called "islamophobes" and therefore dismissed by pk society.
 
So for example, there was never any official Muhammad figure in original islam. He was introduced much later together with the Koran to make muslim atrocities "officially" "moral". The original islam was looting and murdering campaigns made successful by teasing teenage boys with sex slaves and booty.

An example from the tip of the iceberg:

Islam's Wikipedia "history" built on ridiculously polemic and vaguely founded single "sources" several hundred years later


Wikipedia's references to its long and colorfully detailed article about the early muslim murder campaigns (Ridda wars) against apostates contains only one source, Tabari who wrote his fantasies some 300 years later and from an Abbasid (750-) perspective.


Parvaneh Pourshariati has convincingly established that the muslim murder/looting/raping campaign of Mesopotamia (today Iraq) "took place, not, as has been conventionally believed, in the years 632–634, after the accession of the last Sasanian king Yazdgerd III (632–651) to power, but in the period from 628 to 632." An important consequence of this change in timeline means that the muslim jihad crusades started precisely when the Sasanians and Parthians were engaged in internecine warfare over who was to succeed the Sasanid throne.

The muslim finger (shahada) problem




 .


The shahada hate finger is protected by


Saudi based sharia OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!




.

No comments: