Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, September 02, 2014

Is BBC's Pakistani Sharia presenter Mishail Husain an accomplice to Pakistani muslim pedophilia/sexual abuse of non-muslim British girls?


BBC keeps calling muslim sexual predators 'Pakistani' or 'Asian' although they were muslims* and just followed what the Koran says when islam is under attack. Why?


* To those who try to confuse the picture by saying that others than muslims also do it, do remind them of the difference between crimes in general and crimes sanctioned by Human Rights violating islam (e.g. OIC's Sharia declaration in UN). And to those who say that not all muslims do it, do remind them about the big gray-scale of more or less "secularized" "muslims" (i.e. apostates) who always count as muslims whenever it benefits islam.


When Klevius 1998 made his academic paper called The Echo of/about Incest (Ekot om incest) he was met with deep hostility and accused of 'choosing the wrong topic'. Why? Because he started from what was in the best interest of children - not the social state - and simply presented overwhelming scientific proof that biological parents were the least likely group to commit sexual abuse against their children. And the reason for the choice of topic was the ongoing misleading incest propaganda and that Sweden's main public news channel Ekot (the Echo) during a period of 18 days showered the Swedes with false and/or heavily biased views that painted biological parents as the worst threat to children, while completely neglecting the most prevalent perpetrators.

In 2002 a British researcher revealed the horrors of muslim sexual abuse in Britain. However, she was met with similar hostility as that what encountered Klevius. The authority that had ordered the report forced her to change it so extensively that it lost its meaning. And when she contacted the government she was met with total silence.

Klevius paper mentioned above is only available in Swedish. However, while you are learning Swedish (the Scandinavian mother tongue of English) you can read Angels of Antichrist (the by far most important sociological paper from the last century) and Pathological Symbiosis (the most important - and quite possibly the only serious one this far - scientific scrutiny of the social state and how it legally manages to abuse children, their parents and tax payers).

And over it all towers the biggest problem of all - sex segregation. And sad to say, Klevius still remains your foremost expert on it.


Koran inspired sexual etc assault/abuse of non-muslims (or wrong muslims) is per definition a hate crime. So when will we see BBC's helicopter hovering over the houses of muslim sex predators?!


The question is also when or IF the police will start picking the muslim sexual predators off the British streets! Or will the same denial continue while the muslim predators keep laughing and their victims continue suffering - now and especially in their future - if they have one.

Much seems to indicate that BBC and their muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain prefer to protect the social state and the muslims - not the girls which are right now abused while the taxpayers money go to:


The disgusting face of the social state


Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending the children?

The mouse and rat problem originated in the evil* origin of islam - btw, who do you think will win, the mice or the rats? If there are any real mice at all, will say!

 * if German National-socialism (aka "Nazism") or Russian communism should have won in Europe - wouldn't you've called it evil?


Mishal Husain pretends to be a "Brit" yet shares values that are as far you can get from Britishness and basic Human Rights. Or is she just pretending to be a Sharia loving muslim. Either way she turns out as the worst of liars in a deceptive BBC package.





5-6% muslims is the critical point where a country either gives up or starts defending itself against islam, i.e. what in Sharia is called 'attacks against islam' and therefore eligible for jihadist war. And when muslims are attacked the Koran says that muslims can abuse infidel sex slaves their 'right hand possess'.



This Koranic reasoning is the very same that made the worst and most extensive  slave raiding/trading possible in the name of islam.



Pathetic excuses that 'there were also some non-white girls abused' actually underlines the depth of the bigotry and hypocrisy in BBC's reporting".



Iyad Madani, Saudi Fuhrer of the Saudi initiated and Saudi based OIC, all the world's muslims Umma and Sharia organization, which via UN demands the world to criminalize criticism of islam (the worst crime ever) and to make it a crime following Human Rights.
















.

No comments: