Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Monday, July 15, 2013

Whereas Japanese high tech Yuasa batteries have no faults, US Ultralife's batteries have many



An emergency beacon made by Honeywell International Inc. (HON) is under scrutiny in the U.K. probe of last week’s Boeing (BA) Co. 787 fire at London’s Heathrow

The conventional batteries used in the emergency beacon are produced by US company Ultralife and may have caused the fire on an Ethiopian Dreamliner (Boeing 787) recently. And although the real cause of the previous fires on the Dreamliner isn't revealed for the public, what we do know for sure is that they were not caused by Yuasa's high tech super batteries - no matter how much BBC tries to negatively mention the Japanese company when reporting about the Dreamliner.

Btw, compare this with what Klevius has revealed on have much less likely Japanese cars are catching fire compared to European and American cars (sorry for not having updated my web pages but I'm still waiting for your support - it's long over due -  if you really want to have a continuing good access to the web's least biased info).



Some consumer voices about Ultralife batteries:


Here's one review from Amazon:


1.0 out of 5 stars 50% failure rate for sealed batteries August 15, 2011
By NoSpam
I've been using these batteries for over a decade. I usually buy 10 at a time. The last batch I purchased had a 50% failure rate. Opening the sealed package had batteries with leaks, discolored bodies and low voltage.

Several attempts at contacting the manufacturer, including filling out the RMA form have been 100% ignored. They even have section on the website dedicated for RMAs for the batteries, so it's clear that they know about the problems.

Won't ever touch anything with the Ultralife name on it.


and an other:

1.0 out of 5 stars Quality Control Seems to be REALLY Bad, July 1, 2013
By
John Thomas Smith - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Ultralife 9v Long Life Lithium Battery (Electronics)
I bought 8 of these "10 year" smoke alarm batteries September 2009

1 of them had to be replaced after only one year

I just replaced another one, less than 4 years after installing

I am now going to buy a different brand, and will NEVER buy ULTRALIFE again


and a third:

1.0 out of 5 stars Pure garbage - don't be fooled., May 23, 2013
By
zack (Aptos, CA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Ultralife 9v Long Life Lithium Battery (Electronics)
I purchased a batch of these for my four smoke detectors as some are hard to get at. They all lasted less then one year (they were dated good to 2020.) The smoke detectors are electric, the battery is only a back-up!! Regular 9 volt batteries last over 5 years. Save your money. Total rip-off. Someone is laughing all the way to the bank.


this is not the first time Ultralife cheats with poor quality:
FINAL REPORT ON LITHIUM BATTERIES. (ULTRALIFE, ANSI 1604). USED IN RESIDENTIAL SMOKE ALARMS. DECEMBER 2, 2002

http://www.cpsc.gov/PageFiles/102385/smokalrm.pdf




Here's what Klevius wrote

Friday, January 18, 2013

Does Dreamliner suffer the same problem as Flight 447?


The real culprits causing the victims and troubles in Africa and elsewhere


This appalling, rape accused, guy is part of the Saudi family that, together with OIC and Obama, terrorize Africa with islam and islam schools teaching religious hatred (this phenomenon really accelerated after the fall of Gaddafi)!


The spider in the Saudi islamofascist net, Billionaire Alwleed bin Talal (Kingdom Holding etc), is owner of French Thales which makes weapon affairs with the Saudi islamofascists.!

A long time ago France used to be good at technology etc.  Did islam destroy this reputation?

There's a reason why French cars are constantly at the bottom of reliability, safety (see list of car fires) and quality surveys (just before British Land Rover and Range Rover which are usually last) and why Japanese are constantly at the top.


Therefore Klevius thinks it's not Japanese high quality Yuasa and their powerful and technologically advanced batteries (which are part of what made Dreamliner possible) but the usual French low-quality from Thales of France that is behind the problems. Just as it was when Airbus A330 plane Flight 447 from Brazil crashed into the Atlantic ocean.

According to Aviation Weekly (2009) for at least two years before the Flight 447 disaster officials at the European Aviation Safety Agency, EASA, knew there were serious problems with equipment installed on many Air France A330s, made by the French aerospace conglomerate Thales. EASA had reports of a “significant number of events.”

Klevius comment: Thales is the supplier of equipment directly connected to the powerful and advanced Yuasa batteries on the Dreamliner!

Klevius nostalgia: When I, who was used to Finnish and Swedish batteries, got my first Yuasa car battery I couldn't believe the difference it made for cold starts, charging, power reserve, recovery time and how long it lasted etc. It was a similar experience as when I went from my unreliable SAAB and VW to a bullet proof Mazda. And after having driven an old used Mazda (with some 200,000 km on the meter) more than 100,000 km without any repair the question was obvious: Why doesn't everyone drive such a beautiful and reliable car? The racist answer: But it's a Japanese rice-cup!


Klevius serious advice to individuals, nations and companies etc: Keep away from Sharia compliant fascism!








No comments: