Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Sunday, July 07, 2013

Morsi not democratically elected: Voting for Sharia (islam) always means abandoning Human Rights and democracy


The evil link between the origin of islam and OIC, all muslims' Sharia organization


Many muslims are extremely naive and ignorant about the difference between Human Rights/democracy and Sharia. To an extent that they think it's enough to get as many votes as possible.



To better understand the real and undeniable power of this pic please do read Negative Human Rights. Negative rights means freedom from tyranny!


Because of its evil origin islam can never accept Human Rights - what about you?


Here is Klevius' short tutorial for ignorant/misled or simply naive muslims (and equally ignorant and naive non-muslims):


1   Islam (Sharia in any form) is without any doubt always incompatible with the most basic Human Rights. And if you don't trust Klevius then trust the world's biggest (after UN) organization, the islamofascist Saudi based OIC and its Fuhrer Ihsanoglu, who have deliberately abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia (the so called Cairo declaration on islamic "human rights" - look it up, stupid)! Moreover, whenever Human Rights get in conflict with this islamofascist Sharia, Human Rights have not only to be abandoned but also constitute a crime according to Sharia. And yes, Sharia may vary from place to place BUT SHARIA CAN NEVER BE FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH HUMAN RIGHTS! If it did it wouldn't be islam anymore.

2   Democracy is not only about getting the most votes. Even more important than the votes is the underlying Human Rights assumption that every human being is equal. Sharia (in whatever form that can still be called islamic) however, divides people in three categories: muslim men, women and non-muslims.



Islam can not reform because of its origin


Islam's evil origin* explained (again):

* There are tons of historical research available if you really want to know the extremely evil slavery/rapetivism/genocide history of islam. However, the web is contaminated with theocratic misinformation boasted via islamist "sholars" on islamist university faculties etc. Also consider that many Western historians have worked in an atmosphere of trying to find "the good parts of islam" while keeping down the most evil but also most important parts if one wants to fully understand islam.

The reason why islam stubbornly has refused to change (compare what the previous Pope said) is its original sin, namely the racist/sexist parasitism formula that made it "successful" in the first place.

The crucial transition from the Vagina to the Penis system made the muslim variant of Judaism so more “successful” in sex slavery/rapetivism connected to apostasy ban and the denial of muslim women's right to marry non-muslims, and the subtle or open Sharia pressure against non-muslim wives to muslims to convert/submit to islam (remember, less than ten Million Jews now vs 1.5 Billions muslims)! All of this was then packed in a collective "prayer" system where every muslim ought to repeatedly conform/submit daily to show each other their commitment, not necessarily to an unknown "Allah" but to this unknown "Allah's" representative.

As explained many times earlier by Klevius, islam is a late branch of "the chosen people" ideology. 

Here's some old stuff on the topic:

From circumcised Jews to Vagina Jews and Penis muslims - all kept together with rapetivism and slave finance

You're lucky, dear reader, to still have the possibility to be informed by Klevius who happens to be the world's best informed "expert" on sex segregation (yes, it's truly sad that the competition is almost nil - Bourdieu's cautious take on the subject was anyway miserably entangled in Marxism etc).
















It all started with the racist and sexist idea about the world's only true “god” who had chosen the Jews as its blessed people. That leaves little else for the rest of mankind except jealousy or contempt. If you're not a racist then you can't possibly respect racism, can you.

The curse of sexist sex apartheid and slavery racism


They fight in Mideast as they always have.

Ever thought about why there never emerged other "monotheisms" in the world? Only the Jewish one and its derivatives. "Monotheism" wasn't and isn't the rule nor is it, as some racist supremacists like to put it, "the latest stage of civilization". Quite the contrary. Something special happened in the Mideast and it was certainly not "god". And as Klevius has repeatedly pointed out it's about institutionalized sex apartheid (sex slavery) in a way (the Bible etc) that wasn't necessary elsewhere. Neither Buddha (Nepal 563-483 BCE) nor Confucius (China 551–479 BCE) made any effort to blame sex segregation on a "god" conveniently out of reach for others to scrutinize. Nor can you find it anywhere else on the planet. Klevius has also pointed to the strange fact that only semitic (and later, not original, Indo-European) languages have the curious separation of the sexes in third person pronouns (well, it was easy for Klevius who masters Finnish where you simply use 'hän' instead of the stupid Swedish 'han'/'hon' or English 'he'/'she' segregation). The rest of the world has shown that you can not only survive but even gain from dropping this linguistic anomaly.


The curse of sex segregation


 
Canaan was the first of the seven sinners who made idols for the heathens, the other six being Phut, Shelah, Nimrod, Elah, Diul, and Shuah. Canaan, with his six companions, brought precious stones from Havilah (Gen. ii. 11-12), and made of them idols, which at night shone as brightly as the sun, and which were endowed with a power so magical that, when the blind Ammorites kissed them, they regained their eyesight ("Chronicles of Jerahmeel," p. 167; compare Kenaz).

Canaan, in a certain sense, was predestined to this and similar offenses; for he was begotten by his father while in Noah's Ark, whereas God had commanded that the sexes should live separately therein (Gen. R. xxxvi.).

Klevius comment: The mythological Ark wasn't out at sea for longer than 150 days, which fact the mythological all-knowing “god” who ordered the project must have been aware of. Therefore the segregation of the sexes cannot have been imposed because of fear of too many passengers. So why? This, of course, reflects not only a general pattern of sex apartheid but also reveals a particular and deeply perverted view on girls/women among those who created the story.

Concerning the curse of Noah upon Canaan, the Midrashim endeavored in different ways to give a solution to the question why Canaan had to suffer for the sins of his father. The old explanation was that Canaan, not Ham, though he had in no sense transgressed against his grandfather, had to be cursed by him because God had blessed Noah and his sons; and wherever the blessing of God rests there can be no curse (R. Judah, Gen. R. l.c.; Justin Martyr, "Dial. cum Tryph." cxxxix.). This explanation, however, was found to be defective; for it was contrary to Jewish sentiment to curse an innocent man; hence the new assertion that Canaan, like his father, transgressed against Noah.

Canaan the father of slaves - and slave masters

Through the curse which Canaan brought upon himself, the low condition of slaves (Canaan's descendants) is to be explained; for parents exercise a strong influence, for good or for evil, upon the fate of their offspring. "Wo unto the sinners," comments a Midrash, "who bring evil upon themselves, their children, their children's children; in fact, upon all the generations that follow."

Klevius comment: This was the key for "the chosen people" to exploit the "cursed".

Many of the sons of Canaan were worthy of being ordained as rabbis; but the guilt of their father barred them from such a career (Yoma 87a). God, however, is different from man. Man seeks to deprive his enemies of the means of subsistence; but God, though He cursed Canaan, made him a slave, that he might eat and drink of that which his master possessed (ib. 75a).

Klevius comment: In short, the backbone of Jewish history ever since is that of slave trading. This was what made Jews in the Diaspora rich and influential. And this was the secret behind the "peaceful co-existence" in Al-Andalusia's "Golden Age" and elsewhere. When you read about merchants and their goods slaves are seldom mentioned because they were seen as members of the merchant's extended household until sold.


One of the biggest slave empires ever was the Jewish steered Khazar caganate.



Also consider the Origin of the Vikings.



From the Jewish Vagina via Jews believing in Jesus (not Christ) to the muslim Penis, i.e. the origin of islam


Matrilineality in Judaism is the view that people born of a Jewish mother are themselves Jewish.

Klevius comment: As described by Klevius about the kinship atom, matrilineality via one's sister is the basic form of identifying ones biokin relation. You and your sister both came from the same controlled Vagina. So if your sister has a daughter/grand-daughter who marries your son/grand-son you can be 100% sure their children are directly related, via an unbroken chain of Vaginas, to you. However, when the Jews started their disastrous "the chosen people" genocide policy they created Jews via the Penis/rapetivism so as to get as many Jewish soldiers as possible, i.e. what islam much later re-introduced.

However, in Mishnah in the 2nd century CE there's a shift in Rabbinic Judaism from patrilineal to matrilineal descent resulting in now less than 10 Million Jews and more than 1,5 Billion muslims.

Klevius comment:This was to distinguish against Jews believing in Jesus or Christ. And because of this Christian Jews became  Christians in terminology.

In the Hellenistic period of the 4th Century BCE – 1st Century CE some evidence indicates that the offspring of intermarriages between Jewish men and non-Jewish women were considered Jewish.

Klevius comment:  After Alexander the Great many Jews learned Greek and moved out. This laid the basis for the Jewish civil wars etc.
 
Philo of Alexandria calls the child of a Jew and a non-Jew a nothos (bastard), regardless of whether the non-Jewish parent is the father or the mother.

Klevius comment: This is a more than usually stupid Wikipedia sentence. Philo was a Diaspora Jew (Hellenistic Jew) and supported matrilineality. Being a Jew meant being a male Jew. The woman is only the reproducer.




Origin of islam and its desecration of Universal Human Rights 


According to Hugh Kennedy, professor of Arabic language and Arabic history,"before Abd al-Malik, caliph 685-705, Mohammed, who allegedly died 632,  is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever...", and according to Klevius, one has to differ between the evil plundering, enslavement and rapetivism in the vacuum after the Romans, and its “moral” institutionalization – by blaiming "Allah" (i.e. something that doesn't exist in human understanding) – a couple of generations later under Malik.

Initially islam (or what came to be islam) grew out of the formula:
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+apostasy ban

This, together with the poor, illiterate Arab Bedouins, steered by Jewish Christian leaders (and their conspiracies) through the old trade routes in a robbing, pillaging and raping campaign, is the only explanation to the sudden "success" of what later became institutionalized as Kora/islam. And what was "successful" on the Arabian peninsula of course worked equally well in North Africa and elsewhere. And the further they went the more women and soldiers etc submitted to the formula. By force, greed or whatever. Those who didn't were slaughtered or put in Dhimmitude.





No comments: