Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Rapetivism, marital rape, rape - what's the difference?!

Klevius: Sex segregation/rapetivism is the curse of our time. Most victims are females - but so are many of the defenders of sex segregation/rapetivism as well!

The one who is least interested in sex is ALWAYS the one who should invite/decide and, at whatever stage, decline - and passivity is ALWAYS the undeniable sign of rape!
Female heterosexual attraction is a social capital given by nature. But sadly, many women want to both eat the cake and have it. And when they get older they transfer sex segregation to girls under the disguise of cultural 'femininity' instead of giving them full emancipation in accordance with Human Rights. Heterosexual attraction IS the only true "femininity" and cultural 'femininity' is sex segregation! Under Human Rights women and men are free to look just like they want to, but keep in mind that if some part of your reasoning behind your look is cultural 'femininity' then that part is sex segregation.

Why don't you women crush these rapists?! Just say NO to sex segregation and YES to Human Rights!

Islam is the purest in evil* and most elaborated of rapetivist monotheist ideologies

* Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban + by far the biggest proven pile of ideological victims throughout 1400 years of relentless Koranic enslavement, murdering, raping, pillaging etc atrocities. This is the real social islam. However, those who use the concept of 'islam' in a Westernized half-secularized meaning don't fit in this picture and need to explain why their "peaceful" islam happens to be the precise opposite to the real historical islam. Moreover, they have also to explain why Sharia doesn't comply with Human Rights, i.e. why islamofascist Saudi based OIC and its fanatic Egyptian born Turkish Fuhrer Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, representing ALL the world's muslims, have used UN as a platform for a) violating Human Rights and b) criminalizing ALL criticism (conveniently called 'islamophobia') against Human Rights violating islam/Sharia! 


Koran: As a muslim you can have sex with infidel girls your right hand possesses! 

But according to the strange logic of Peter Davies (UK), Chief Executive, Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), the fact that some Asian (read 'muslim') girls who were also groomed but not talked about showed that it had nothing to do with racism or religion.

Klevius comment: Quite the contrary! This really shows it has all to do with islam. Infidel girls can, according to the Koran, “if possessed by your right hand” be used as sex slaves. However, according to the Koran and Sharia, muslim girls are to be punished if they are groomed. Therefore it's natural that neither muslim girls nor their families want to talk about it.And muslim girls are groomed when they "behave like infidels".

Rowena Mason: After nine men were convicted of abusing girls in the Rochdale case, it emerged police and social workers had failed to tackle the issue of Asian men grooming vulnerable under-aged white girls for up to a decade.
They were accused of failing to investigate for fear of being perceived as racist.
In the Savile scandal, the BBC has been accused of failing to investigate rumours that their star entertainer molested under-aged girls in the 1960s and 1970s.
It was alleged in an ITV programme that Savile targeted vulnerable girls from care homes. Since then, more than 300 potential victims have come forward.




No comments: