Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
US' first muslim born "president" and UK's first islamic republic both respect Sharia racism/sexism!
Read what a Jewish "islamophobe" thinks abt YOUR double standard for islam!
Remember, islam is ALWAYS "under attack" precisely because of its totalitarian nature, which, in turn, is due to its own moral bigotry. No wonder islam needs jihadism and protection from the truth about itself.
What seems so difficult to understand for the ignorant and pathetic lost fascist "soldiers of Allah" (where "Allah" stands for their own ignorance, prejudice, racism and sexism) and their naive (or deliberate, as for example BBC and many muslims) supporters, is that islam is not only a tool for their evilness but the very evilness itself in that islam's original ideology was to make slavery and other Sharia parasitism the very basis for its community, the muslim Umma and Caliphate. So when the British Museum (Neil MacGregor) and BBC together made "the history of the world in hundred objects" the hitherto most disgusting of propaganda efforts after Goebbels, for a mostly ignorant audience, they just presented islam with something that has never been a part of islam itself! There has never been "islamic scientists", "liberation" etc because of the simple reason that the very concepts are oxymorons! And the islamic Arabs' main currency was slaves and Sharia their finance. Just as now Sharia finance goes hand in hand with racist/sexist islamic Sharia law!
Contrary to the islam supporting lies on Wikipedia, BBC etc, in reality historical records clearly prove not only that the so called "transatlantic slave trade" was a tiny fraction of the islamic Arab slave raid/trade system based on Koran/Sharia, but also that the death rate during transportation (not to mention the extreme death rate of eunuchs) was some eight times higher to the muslim Arab slave markets (Mecca etc)! And whereas the "transatlantic" slaves (who were Africans captured by muslims) were mostly males, the muslim Arabs preferred young females (i.e. sex slavery) and eunuchs, which fact doesn't in any sense exclude the fact that the number of islam's plantation slaves to the Mideast hugely outnumbers any figures from other parts of the world (just consider that already in the ninth Century more than half a Million African male slaves tried to free themselves only in the Basra region of today's Iraq)! Also see The Arab slave trade!
The most central tenet for a muslim is to not abandon his "religion" ('his' because only males can be fully muslims according to Koran/Sharia)! If he does it's called apostasy which is considered the worst sin a muslim can commit. Obama's father was muslim born, and muslimhood is ALWAYS spread via the Penis (not via the Vagina as in traditional Judaism - muslim bearing/fostering women are only the kerils for muslimhood, i.e. what Klevius names rapetivism - also consider Klevius definition of religion). So to say that Obama isn't a muslim is quite contrary to anything essential of islam!
To understand anything of this you may first educate yourself with the true meaning of the Negative Rights in the 1948 Human Rights Declaration which stand in sharp opposition to EVERY form of the islamic Sharia that OIC (57 islamic states who now constitute UN's largest voting bloc) is trying to impose on the world while simultaneously trying to hide 1400 years of islamic atrocities against humanity (the worst crime ever, counted in number of victims for a single ideology) by criminalizing the publishing of these crimes as "defamation of religion"!
Klevius clarification for nutheads and other ignorant people: Islamists use to say that Sharia is above human law. Well, Negative Rights are even one step above "divine" law. Why? Simply because unlike human law and "divine" law, Negative Rights LACK human interpretation!
What has the US islamic NY Times Square terrorist Faisal Shahzad in common with the muslim born Mr X US "president" and the islamic republic in central London (Tower Hamlets)?
Klevius answer: None of them respect US and UK law and Human Rights, but ALL of them respect islamic law /Sharia! Faisal Shahzad said what every Sharia supporting muslim agrees on: “I don’t care for the laws of United States”!