Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
OIC ambassador to the U.N. Ufuk Goken at American Islamic College (AIC) conference in Chicago recently: "OIC is not an organization with double standards."
Klevius: Yes, you are you bigot/hypocrite! Why else would you propagate for the violation of UN's 1948 Human Rights Declaration?! OIC's double standard is called the Cairo Declaration on islamic "human rights" (i.e. Sharia). And for you who, unlike Klevius and Mr X "president", are illiterate in judicial language (or simply too lazy): The main difference between Human Rights and OIC's Sharia declaration is that the latter restricts the freedom of girls/women and opens up for racism because of the islamic infidel criterion that stays in sharp conflict with the equality ideal expressed in Human Rights! And of course, islamic apostasy ban, islamic prohibition for women to marry non-muslims, etc etc! Islam is totalitarian fascism and Sharia its weapon. Add to this that islam is by far the worst ideological crime ever known to history (based on islam's victims) and that OIC tries to make the announcemnet of these selfevident facts a crime!
Islam is today represented by OIC, i.e. a political organization striving for the ultimate violation of Human Rights! And OIC and the Cairo declaration are both initiated by the disgusting Saudi dictator and hate mongerer who also happens to be Mr X "president's" first call and the one he bowed so deeply for!
So let's burn islam!
Learn abt Negative Human Rights, the opposite to islam!
Klevius isn't only your intellectual bedrock in the stream of ignorant (or evil) journalists, politicians etc, he's also your foremost (sad to say) sexpert in a time of misinformation!
And as you know, Klevius is the very first to clearly address sex segregation as the underlying problem of both islam and psychoanalysis! The former as a barbaric brute force, and the latter as a psudo intellectual "sophistication". When sex segregation eventually started to cracking up in the West due to the industrial revolution, a powerful counter force called psychoanalysis emerged (see Klevius Psychosocial Freud timeline).
So when you are bombarded with high flown plattitudes like "sex and religion are essential for your well being" always remember that this is brainwashing! Just relay on yourself and the Negative Human Rights! But a trip to From Klevius without love may also be relieving.
Islam is rapetivism, i.e. sex slavery - originally and now!
Whereas Judaism was spread by the Vagina islam is spread by the Penis. The expansion of islam and the "reward" to its jihadists is made one. And the payer is the woman. So why do women submit to such a disgraceful state of life? This, the female patriarchy, is one of the main questions Klevius has worked with for long. An extraordinary angle of view, knowledge and insight abt the topic, combined with a stunning decrease of knowledge in the general discourse, has resulted in Klevius/KLEVUX being its foremost expert. In this respect it may also be noted that whereas feminists used to naively (or deliberately?) emphasize "women's experience" hence in fact empowering sex segregation, what is needed is rather the male experience of women. Why? Simply because heterosexual attraction (HSA) is a built-in male feature culturally affecting females to such an extent that they are often brainwashed to confuse love with sex. I repeat: All "monotheisms" are abt sex slavery (and in the case of islam combined with infidel slavery and apostasy ban), and Christian polytheism in its original form, was a protest movement against sex slavery.
The female patriarchy (i.e. true feminism*) utilizes that very incompetency (already described by Mary Wollstonecraft >200 yrs ago) that sex segregation has created among women, and then term this incompetency (combined with the power of HSA) "feminine".
* Feminism is sex segregation, i.e. guarding the "feminine". What is usually mistaken as feminism is the strive for equality between the sexes under the false flag of feminism, often because the "feminist" herself doesn't realize the difference (or simply wants to utilize it).