Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Sunday, February 28, 2010
The extreme illogic of islam
Many representatives* of islam really think there’s a logic in islam. However, there’s no other logic in islam except the original evil & inhumane racist/sexist one! But that desert robber/slave trade*** logic inevitably clashes on a global level just like parasitism always does.
*Without representatives of islam there wouldn’t be any islam, stupid**!
** For you who think it’s stupid to call people “stupid”, you may consider that Klevius never calls simple minded people “stupid”. In this actual case it was meant for those morons who think they’re clever when dismissing Klevius as not understanding that islam doesn’t have representatives!
*** Remember that all women are slaves in islam. This is why OIC (57 islamist jihadi nations in the UN) have their own “human rights” (Sharia)!
A telling example of the deep confusion re. Human Rights & islam:
Warna Hettiarachchi Ontario, Canada (sic): "Western Liberal laws and Human Rights do not work for Sri Lanka, any more than they are ignored and renders useless for Middle-Eastern countries where Islamic Laws are the local norm and standard. World media and journalists, here is a challenge for you: Write about the penal codes and deterrent punishment schemes applied in Arab nations, including beheading, stoning-to-death, chopping off fingers and limbs for criminal activities as being viewed by Western nations and society as “barbaric”, “Inhuman” and “against human-rights”. Then you should carry out a 10-year campaign to convince those nations to change their laws to become more “forgiving” and “crime-friendly” as yours. Oh wait, that will never happen – as the Arab nations are oil and financially RICH and they have loads of money to buy you, your hand and your pen off. Aljazeera, BBC, CNN, Guardian, Times and other electronic and print media organizations, please note… Am I not correct? You Western & Oil rich-countries-funded media organizations want to control the world’s political, energy and financial resources to their own monetary and controlling advantages. The same ethics and worldwide-rules together with Mass Media Corporations have also FAILED to highlight the CHILDREN being dragged away by LTTE Tamil Tiger Terrorists to be brainwashed and trained as Suicide Bombers and LTTE front-line brigade? The UN and the world KNEW about LTTE using Child soldiers as young as 13 years!! Where were the Western Nations, particularly the Liberal Canadian PM Paul Martin, Jean Chrétien, Gordon Brown, David Miliband, Eric Solheim, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry and the EU, etc??"
Klevius answer to Warna Hettiarachchi: They were exactly where you are! Denying the logic of Negative Human Rights! Why? Because admitting the logic of Negative Human Rights would make the one missing from your list, Mr X “president” of USA plus all muslim political representatives political criminals, because if they “respect” islam they don’t respect the US Constitution & democracy!
Human Right based on Negative HUman Rights aren't "Western" but global! The irresistable ideology of Negative Rights rests on its complete lack of ideology!
So why aren't they more supported/enforced? Because of 1) ignorance, 2) socialists don't like freedom (see the most important sociological paper from the last Century) 3) political greed, & of course, 4) the madness of "monotheist" "symphatizers" (read cowards)! If you really need to limit yourself (see Klevius definition of religion) pls keep it for yourself!
Klevius history lesson: The Tamil terrorists are rooted in Arabic islamic slave raid/trade history long time ago (before the Western "colonialism" which, btw, brough education & stopped slavery), pretty much as the Hutu/Tutsi history in Africa. Also consider that e.g. Hinduism after having met with evil islam became much worse itself. It's the trademark of islam (i.e. Mohammedanism) to infiltrate via the ruling class, & when the evil seed is sawn the ruling class either become muslims or "half muslims" like e.g. in India & China etc.
According to K S Lal, Slaves were abducted or captured by marauders (Subuktigin, Balban), they were sold by jealous or needy relatives (Iltutmish), and they were purchased by slave-traders to be sold for profit (Aibak). These methods were known to Muslim rulers in India. All these and many other methods were employed by them and their nobles in making slaves in India. The phenomenon and its application was shocking to the Hindu mind; the Muslims, however, thought otherwise. According to Ibn Khaldun, the captives were “brought from the House of War to the House of Islam under the rule of slavery, which hides in itself a divine providence; cured by slavery, they enter the Muslim religion with the firm resolve of true believers…”1 Muslims took pride in enslaving people.
Islamic parasitism was born out of sponging on slaves & islam ruined not only the whole African continent but also much of southern & central Asia. It’s really disgusting when you now read on Wikipedia that “The Kaffirs were brought to Sri Lanka by the Portuguese, Dutch and British” (sic)! All of this is outlined & explained in my so far unpublished book Roots Guide. However, due to islamic fascism & its collaborators I’ve got no chance to publish it. I tried Bjorn Ulvaeus' (ABBA) publishing company (because he seemed to be defending Ayaan Hirsi Ali). However, he was apparently too a coward to pick it up although it seems the head of the company supported it. I don’t know…
As to muslims, islam was enforced upon you before you were born and the door out (freedom) locked with a key (Sharia) that has been thrown away (apostasy ban)!
Citizens of the world, if you care abt freedom ALWAYS vote for politicians AGAINST islam, the worst crime ever!
No matter what the agenda otherwise is, the most important vote now is for freedom & against islam! Negative rights for a positive future, instead of the ongoing ultimate collapse of Western media & Western politics in front of the worst of evils, islam (and what abt non-Western media etc?!).
Politicians ignorant abt islam but some have the courage at least to say stop when they realize what's going on
UK Labour MP Jim Fitzpatrick and his wife walked out of an islamic marriage after discovering they would have to sit in separate rooms. Jim Fitzpatrick also revealed his ignorance abt sex segregation by saying that "gender segregation" is a sign of increasing radicalisation and was damaging to social cohesion".
Klevius comment: "Gender segregation" is a PC oxymoron. Gender cannot be segregated simply because it's already segregated! Gender implies a cultural relation to something that HAS TO BE DIFFERENT. Sex, on the other hand, is a physical distinction. If you're physically female you can play women's football no matter what your "gender" is! Gender replaced sex in PC language firstly because feminists wanted to keep women as their protecterd poilitical constituency, and secondly because it suited main stream chauvinists, islam etc. quite well when they eventually realized what Klevius has said abt feminism for decades! Some "feminists" haven't got it though, so they got intellectually schizophrenic. And islam is all abt sex segregation as Klevius has repeatedly warned!
However, muslim leaders of course insisted sex segregation is "traditional" at Islamic weddings as well as in mosques. They were surprised that MP Jim Fitzpatrick was unaware of the fact, although his London constituency is already one third muslim!
Klevius comment: How many equally naive politicians do we have out there performing evil political correctness in the service of the worst crime ever against humanity?! And these ignorant people are "disgusted" when they see Klevius "islamophobic" pages! Would be fun if it wasn't so sad.
The following products may be desired by some people:
Politicians free from islam/muslim bias
Muslim free neighborhoods
Education free from islamic propaganda
Programs free from muslim "comedians"
News agencies free from islamist bias
Demand usually result in production. However, the marketing of such products might be tricky. And ghow many true muslims are there really? Any?!
Klevius suggests that "ex-muslims" of all sorts join negative rights for a positive future!