Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgensteins's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Is Obama the oldfashioned & technologically lagging* BMW which is still struggling to catch up with tech on the Prius 1997 level?! And while being so inmcompetent still manages to fool people that the opposite is the case!
This is how Swedish Aftonbladet uses its racist non-journalism!
The headline says every second car in Sweden fails the annual safety test. This is then connected to a picture of Toyota's emblem (something you almost NEVER see otherwise - on the contrary, low quality (compared to Japanese) brands such as e.g. VW, Audi, BMW*, Renault, Peugeot, MB, Volvo** etc are always generously exposed in positive images while Japanese brands are usually carefully hidden - counts grand pianos as well. Whereas the Steinway label is always shown on TV, the better brand, Yamaha, when chosen by the performer - i.e. those who aren't satisfied with the Steinway usually offered - is carefully avoided). However, the truth is that the Toyota's turned out to be the safest (together with other Japanese brands, as they've always been, year after year, while European brands occupy the bottom of the list)!
see the Swedish car fire list
* More than 100 yrs ago most cars were made in the technologically easiest way: A 6-in line engine directly connected to a gear box from which a long drive shaft propels the rear wheels. This is stone age tech & only defendable on special cars for special purposes & constellations! Volvo was long one of the last dinosauries but dropped this concept in the early 1990s. But BMW has managed to make a "drivability" (BMWs are notorious for bad drivability immediately when the road is wet or not clean enough!) & "quality" (average Euro standard on bigger models, below avergae when it comes to Minis) & "tech" (absolutely nothing - even their racing cars use Japanese parts when it comes to high tech -. Did you know that M3 (which is only rear wheel driven) for example, needed OLD rear axis tech from Mitsubishi EVO for to be able to perform!) imago on purely subjective grounds. READ MORE HERE
** Unless, of course, they have Yamaha engine & Toyota's gearbox (as the more expensive Volvo's usually have). However, because of the lousy overall quality the car beahves badly anyway. Just ask the Swedish mother who saw the family's new Volvo XC90 (car of the year!?) bursting into flames after she had parked it and, luckily, already left the kids at school!
This constant misinformation to the ignorant public abt car safety is fueled by a racist attemt to cover up for technical shortcomings compared to the Japanese. Prius, Toyota's green tech wonder, revolutionaized car production 1997 (YES, 1997!) by introducing a whole new technological concept that makes non-polluting electrical driving possible where there are many children& other people, while also making it possible to regain energy lost in braking. This latter feature was new & should be credited not blamed, when there are still some room to optimize the software.
The faulty accelerator was a non-Japanese product on some (not Prius) cars made OUTSIDE Japan by an American manufacturer!
How many have died or being victimized by Western cars with their low quality standars through the decades?! Volvo, BMW, Audi etc, are notorious for car fires, accelerating cruise controls, electrical faults etc. Due to the overall difference in greenishness & quality Western car proiducers owe the Japanese ones a lot!
Non-Japanese cars burst into flames far more often than Japanese brands!
YOU ARE A VICTIM OF SENSELESS, RACIST, SEXIST (& sometimes just ignorant) MEDIA MISINFORMATION!So what steers it? Sorry you socialists but it's the capital. And you're the worst capitalists (see the most important sociological paper from the last century, Klevius' "Angels of Antichrist"!