Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Wednesday, January 06, 2010
Saudi sponsored Kosovo muslim Shkupolli tortured & poked the eyes out of one of his wives in Finland in accordance with islamic Sharia**
OIC, led by Saudi Arabia, consists of 57 muslim states who have agreed to 1) heavily violate UN Human Rights & replace them with islamic Sharia, & to 2) criminalize criticism of islam (the worst crime ever against humanity).
Alleged content of a Finnish police report on Ibrahim Shkupolli, a Kosovo muslim immigrant with alleged connections to the muslim terror organization UCK (i.e. KLA, Kosovo "Liberation" Army, which mass murdered Serbs (no, there are no "muslim Serbs", that would contradict islamic totalitarian teaching - allegiance to islam always wins over nationality, dude!) & other non-muslim civilians hence causing the war):
Kosovo muslim Ibrahim Shkupolli (who also had at least one other wife & kids back in Kosovo) allegedly tied his Finnish wife (who had tried to divorce him in accordance with Finnish but not muslim law) up on a chair, tortured her & carved her eyes out with a knife in the manner of muslim Jihad fighters in old Yugoslavia.
Klevius comment: The islamic Penal Laws are contrary to the International Declaration to Remove Discrimination Against Women and the International Declaration of Human Rights, not to mention that they gravely & inevitably violate Western Human Rights based on the crucial Negative Human Rights which ultimately exclude any sort of islamic Sharia because the Negative Human Rights in the 1948 UN Declaration protect* EVERY (incl. women) individuals rights!. I know it could be difficult to understand so why don't you take a look at Klevius explanation!
* You ignorant, who dont understand the basics of (negative) human rights, pls try to see them as the deepest possible moral guideline, i.e. a last resort/space for the individuals freedom together with others. Of course who ever can violate them in praxis, this isn't the issue but rather that the fundamental principle of legislation ought to rest on them!
** If you're a true muslim you obey islam, incl. its (inevitable) racist/sexist infidel ideology & apostasy ban (not allowed to leave islam) & its sex segregation which makes girls/women a lower household species in comparison to boys/men!
Criticizing muslim racism & the worst ideological crime ever against humanity is called - racism! Why?
Bruce Bawer: Justin Vaïsse, took to task several authors, including me, who have warned in recent years of the Islamization of Europe. Vaïsse countered these authors’ mountains of hard facts with a big helping of the usual supercilious sneering. His thesis: Europe is chugging along just fine; Islam poses no real challenge to the continent’s freedom and prosperity; after all, the “experts” say so. Never mind the draining of European welfare systems by Muslim families, the explosion in rapes and gay-bashings and Jew-baitings, the proliferation of honor killings and forced marriages and no-go zones; never mind the murders of Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh by fanatics who objected to those men’s positions on Islam; never mind the threats directed at critics of Islam, such as Geert Wilders, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and Robert Redeker, which have obliged them to live in hiding or with round-the-clock bodyguards.
Klevius comment: Isn't it amazing that we now, just some 60 yrs after getting rid of Hitler & after having agreed on a set of Human Rights which foremost aim was to hinder a repeating of totalitarian fascism, again experience the same problem & that media & politicians & ignorant citizens so eagerly support this new path towards fascism! 57 islamist member states of UN are now united around islamic Sharia fascism & the Cairo Declaration on Sharia "human rights" & the aim to criminalize every critical or "stereotyping" of islam, while freedom, pluralism & democracy makes the other powerless.
However, the simple cure is to recognize that with such (islamic) aims one can't logically/morally participate in a civilized democratic debate/legislation, because one's aim is to destroy democracy &/or the individual freedom given through Negative Human Rights (the basis for UN's 1948 Declaration)!
You disgusting individual racist who call yourself a muslim
so that you can hide your racist/sexist attitudes behind Western Human Rights & welfare, you are even worse than the German Nazi supporters. The German NationalSOCIALISTS' 25 point manifesto was hard to distinguish from a social democratic manifesto if you just removed a few lines abt Jews! Most of those Nazis & almost all Germans today spit on that. And no one gets offended! The same will happen to islam & islamists, of course, but how much suffering will it take before we are there?!
And ask whoever expert on islam, without infidel racism (i.e. that infidels are no real humans), apostasy ban (not allowed to leave islam) & rapetivism (Sharia sex segregation with due "duties" to serve as sex slaves & to reproduce as many new muslims as possible) there's no islam left, no matter what you call it! Got it dude!
The initial "success" of islam was based on islam's very source code: Female sex to male jihadists, booty & slaves from the infidels, & a Sharia system that made it morally right to abuse & even murder infidels incl. women!
Islam is the biggest & worst slave master through 1400 yrs. Slaves were the coins of islamic finance! And the islamic migration out from Medina/Mecca was a parasitic colonialism of the surrounding more civilized world!