Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.
Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.
Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:
1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.
2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.
3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.
* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").
Klevius "islamophobia" CV
Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):
* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.
1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.
2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).
3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.
4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).
Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!
Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Friday, January 15, 2010
From slave raider Mohammed to the Saudi Caliph, 1400 yrs of islamic infidel racist/sexist intolerans & hate mongering
The islamic (over)reproduction of evil goes via sex segregation (ideologically confined females)!
ALL HAITI SLAVES WERE CAPTURED & SOLD BY MUSLIMS IN WEST AFRICA! The history of Haiti is a micro Africa. Slaves, slave masters & those betwixt & between! Catholicism is no way out but Islam was the way in!
Goel Ratzon (the Israeli sect guy with 30 wives & 89 kids) & islam both share the ideology of polygamy, "modest" dress code for females, & forbid women from socializing with males. The home & kids was inspected by social workers in 2000 & the kids were well off, well dressed & clean so the "family" passed the test (abt the destructive uselessness of modern social workers, see Angels of Antichrist).
How many slaves/victims has the evil ideology of islam caused through 1400 yrs? Although we don't know the upper limit we do know that the lower limit is enough to render islam the worst crime in history. We also know that this crime isn't a "cultural" one but quite the opposite, an extremely deliberate ideological tactics that not only started islam but was its parasitic essence. Islam's currency used to be slaves & its main source for minting it was Africa. The mystery isn't islam but why so many are blinking that the islamic caliph is naked!
The methodological Arabic Koranic slave blood sucking & destruction of Africa during 1400 yrs spread like cancer through most of Africa long begore Europeans arrived.
Islam is a parasitic thug ideology which has been dressed/covered by the ignorance of "muslims" themselves. Hence muslim's are the most likely to be duped abt the true nature of islam, i.e. Mohammed's hallucinations/fabrications (as alleged long after his death when he was reinvented & the Koran was compiled - always remember that Mohammed didn't exist officially before Malik decided to use this murky shadow from the past).
As the absolute majority of "muslims" are ignorant abt islam, i.e. no real muslims, those "radical muslims" (i.e. studious followers of Mohammed's senseless crimes/immoral values) proportionally become the majority muslims.
Sometimes you may hear that "islamists don't read the Koran correctly". Well, does it really matter how they read it when they follow the bad example of Mohammed, its alleged editor?!
What's much more important is the simple fact that islam IS its basic formula: A parasitic slave finance made possible by sex/booty jihad & a sexist one way reproduction line (Sharia/apostasy ban) embedded in an infidel racism functioning as a (im)moral sanctioning.
Cure your ignorance abt women, men, psychoanalysis, feminism & islam:
Klevius psychosocial timeline on Sigmund Freud's lifelong attempt to defend how he treated his wife.
Klevius sex tutorial (incl. Klevius concept of rapetivism)
From Klevius without love (incl. the 1921 ban on the world's best female football team)
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state (the most important sociological paper from the last century - evil tongues will claim it's simply because of a total lack of competition - so...)
Gametes have no sex
Marriage, kinship, friendship Marriage is a late invention. "Primitive" tribes didn't marry. So if you want to claim sex segregated marriage as development then you also need to see technological advancement as development, don't you. And if you do then islam will inevitably become a sex segregated primitivism, doesn't it!
To understand this you may need to take a look at: Origin of religion
Childless female child psychoanalysts in search for "femininity" based on "motherhood" (the sarcastic quote marks are there to indicate that both are cultural inventions - perhaps caused by an over-emphasized wish to capitalize on child birth/breast-feeding for the purpose of defending sex segregation).
From Freud to bin Laden
THE TRUE ORIGIN OF VIKINGS
If you want the real truth abt the historical Viking phenomenon go to
Origin of Vikings
After reading it I'd guess your world isn't any longer the world it used to be! Moreover, I'd guess most of you initially think this is just another angle on the subject, &, after reading it, are forced to agree it's by far the best overall explanation of historical facts, no matter you like it or not. Why? Simply because of Klevius methodology, i.e. to dare to see islam for what it is, not for what you'd like it to be! What? Am I exaggerating islam's role? Absolutely not, because my (& Koran's) definition of islam is: parasitism based on slaves & sex slaves embedded in an immorality built of infidel racism! Only this will explain islam's rapid initial spread. And like cancer needs blood vessels, islam needs a host civilization that can feed its growth! All civilizations "visited"/contaminated with islam have slowly deteriorated into a state of ultimate misery, the Ottoman "empire" being the last example.