Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future
Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism
Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:
True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).
Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017
So let's face islam with this definition.
A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").
And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.
* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".
Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite
The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.
It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!
Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.
Friday, December 11, 2009
ISLAM (Sharia OIC) IS THE WORST CRIME IN HISTORY & THE WORST THREAT TO THE FUTURE OF OUR CHILDREN! The very soul of islam was from scratch the parasitic enslavement of "infidels" (note that "muslim" women are also "infidels" under the sex segregated dhimmitude of Sharia that Klevius names rapetivism). A low estimate gives 300 Million dead during slave "pilgrimage" (only in Basra in the 9th Century islam had between 0.5-1 Million Zanj, i.e. African, plantation slaves! Add eunuchs & female sex slaves!).
OIC map of evil
Islamic Sharia cancer/rapetivism is also the world's worst polluter!
Slavery in Koran
Sharia finance has always been parasitic. Islam is economically impotent in itself. That's why Mohammed was a robberer! So you "prince" Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud(or whatever), instead of using the money the non-islamic civilization has poured into your lap, for boosting evil islam, decent moral would suggest you to do the opposite, namely to help islam's slaves to get rid of this evil ideology from the past!
Islam's Saudi puppet "president" Mr X'Obama now adds Yemen to his bombing campaign!
A muslim born apostate US "president" Mr X who can't stop telling us how much he respects islam & its criminal dictators & the world threatening OIC.
Two UK muslim peers, one (Ahmed) who allegedly killed because of reckless (sms?) driving, & who threatened the peace of UK & its parliament with 10,000 islamic street jihadists, & one (Warsi) who calls her fellow muslims "idiots" when they follow the Koran & Mohammed.
A fanatic (Khalid) Saudi connected black muslim supremacist (Black Panthers, Nation of Islam etc) who sponsored & mentored Mr X & "arranged" his admission to Harvard for transfer to the senate & all the way up to the White House. Seen from the eyes of ignorance it could have been a sunshine story. But it isn't, islam is the worst crime ever against humanity & OIC (56 muslim nations & Palestine) with its horrifying Sharia commitment, constitute the worst threat to humanity now & here. And Mr X "president" knows very well the OIC agenda, yet still applauds it!
Mr X close friend (Ingrid Matson) who leads all American muslims towards a US Sharia constitution.
The Saudi Caliph of all muslims
& his close friend Bashir who is wanted by the Haague for crimes against humanity in Darfur.
Muslims from CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations) an organization founded by Al-Qaeda which is guarding the spread of Sharia islam in the US, & which is a frequent guest in the White House.
The fat guy whom they award on the pic is the very same Hasan who started Bridges TV for the purpose of correcting "misunderstandings abt islam". Hasan then murdered his divorcing apostate wife by stabbing her nine times & then ritually fulfilled Sharia by decapitating her.
Klevius comment: Excuse me, did I hear "milder forms of Sharia"?! Look again! E.g. how the "moderate" SE Asian muslim nations inevitably are slipping towards Aceh's medieval stoning etc! Look at Saudi Arabia which is now busy lashing a 75 yr old woman for her violating islamic sex segregation!
Isn't it the real sign of evil when islam first sucks blood from Africa for 1400 yrs, leaving it with a deadly chronical disease (islam) which has effectively hindered its development, & then comes back with Western oil money & accuses the West for islam's crimes! What do you think "prince" Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud(or whatever)? Or has your schizophrenic moral between islam & the West made you chronically unable to think?!
You who laughted at Klevius six yrs ago will probably cry after six more yrs. Pls note that what was considered "polemic" "tendentious" "extreme" etc text six yrs ago is now more or less common islam criticism (except, of course, for the most important insight of Klevius namely how islam is married via sex segregation to the "Judeo-Christian" influence in the West).
The only reform suitable for islam is its worst crime & fault, namely full apostasy.
Klevius acknowledgement: I've introduced the word 'rapetivism' as to describe the innermost evil of islam, the very core of its sex segregation. When Mohammed got attracted to the teen girl Safiyah he also wanted to rape her. Just like with the teenage Zaynab Mohammed got aroused after having peeped at her. Mumin Salih: "Muhammad was struck by the attractive figure of near-naked beautiful Zaynab, and went away saying: “Praise be to Allah, who can change how the heart feels”. The meaning of this ‘prayer’ is that Muhammad’s feeling toward Zaynab is now different from what it was, when he asked her to marry Zayd. In other words, he wasn’t attracted to her before, but now he is. What has changed in Zaynab that made Muhammad feel attracted to her? Obviously, when Muhammad peeped at Zaynab, he did not ‘see’ a change in her personality, but a nearly naked woman with a sexy figure." A medical definition of Peeping Tom: "This disorder involves achieving sexual arousal by observing an unsuspecting and non-consenting person who is undressing or unclothed. This behavior may conclude with masturbation by the voyeur who does not seek sexual consent with the person he is observing." Klevius comment: Mohammed wasn't only a Peeping Tom but also a rapist.
Ayesha Ahmed: How Mohammed Acquired Safiyah as His Sex-slave
Safiyah realized resistance was futile. She will get raped any ways, either by prophet or another jihadi. At least Prophet had a regular supply of slave-girls from his 20% cut of booty and many resident wives. She will be hit less for sex less often... With a regular jihadi she will be raped day and night then sold in a slave market to the highest bidder. She gave up the fight and laid motionless while the prophet got his jollies.
See what is really said in Arabic & compare to the lies abt islam spread in the West
From the robberer Mohammed to Saudi Arabia & OIC
Although UK "political baroness" Warsi shouts on the streets that Sharia muslims are "idiots", Klevius includes these "muslim idiots" as representing islam simply because they share the view of 56 + 1 islamic states/territories (OIC). Not to call OIC islamic is pure nonsense. However, notwithstanding this BBC & other media stubbornly continue their misleading journalism by calling OIC like muslims living outside OIC "no real muslims" or following "a distorted islam"!
Your ignorance abt islam hinders you from recognizing the evil totalitarian logic behind islam that is still the same as it was when the caravan robberer Mohammed started it. Instead of being a faith for morality & goodness islam applies to our lowest & most disgusting instincts, such as (infidel)racism & (Sharia)sexism.
Cure your bottomless & truly frightening ignorance abt islam!
Origin of islam
For you who don't know the disgusting islamofascist nature of the islamic OIC organization that has taken over the UN. OIC was initiated by Saudi Arabia which refused to accept UN's Human Rights Declaration of 1948. OIC has agreed to follow Kora/Sharia
Adama Dieng: OIC's Cairo Declaration (Sharia) deliberately restricts fundamental freedoms and rights -- most notably, freedom of conscience. It was introduced in the name of "defense of human rights", but proposes unacceptable discrimination against non-Muslims and women, while legitimating heinous practices, e.g. Shari'a-compliant punishments (from corporal punishments, to mutilation, and stoning), which attack the integrity and dignity of the human being."
Klevius additional criticism: As a 1400 yrs ongoing crime against humanity islam deservs idictment, not respect. Only when the victims of islamic ideology/parasitism are openly accounted for can you assess the depth of the crime. And only then can you really understand islams evil basic tenets. Moreover, islam is all abt evil sex segregation because this is its key to reproduction. So far only Klevius has addressed this the most important of questions. Don't you still get it? Look at the OIC map above!
The trial abt Geert Wilder's right to defend Human Rights against an ideology that strives to crush them
Robert Spencer: The very idea of trying someone for offending someone else is absurd – especially when the offended group is known to traffic in the PC multiculturalist coin of wounded feelings, so as to gain the political power that comes from victim status. That the Amsterdam District Court would aid and abet this absurdity and obvious manipulation unmasks the Wilders trial – even before it starts – as what it really is: an attempt by the nation’s political elites to silence one of their most formidable critics. The one who has the power to decide what is an actionable offensive statement or prosecutable incitement has the power to control the discourse – and that’s what the prosecution of Wilders is all about. If offending someone is a crime, can those who find hate speech laws offensive bring suit against their framers?
The action against Wilders is taking place, moreover, against the backdrop of the 57-government Organization of the Islamic Conference’s ongoing efforts at the United Nations to silence speech that they deem critical of Islam — including “defamation of Islam” that goes under the “pretext” of “freedom of expression, counter terrorism or national security.”
If they succeed in doing this, Europeans and Americans will be rendered mute, and thus defenseless, in the face of the advancing jihad and attempt to impose Sharia on the West — in fact, one of the key elements of the laws for dhimmis, non-Muslims subjugated under Islamic rule, is that they are never critical of Islam, Muhammad, or the Qur’an. Thus this prosecution in Amsterdam not only aids the advance of Sharia in the West, but is itself an element of that advance.
The stakes are so high in the Wilders case also because the OIC has a new, powerful ally as it moves against the freedom of speech. In October the Obama Administration actually co-sponsored an anti-free speech resolution at the United Nations. Approved by the U.N. Human Rights Council, the resolution, cosponsored by the U.S. and Egypt, calls on states to condemn and criminalize “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.”
Echoing Obama’s stated determination to combat “negative stereotyping of Islam” in the United States, the resolution also condemns “negative stereotyping of religions and racial groups.” This is, of course, an oblique reference to accurate reporting about the jihad doctrine and Islamic supremacism — for such reporting, and not actual negative stereotyping or hateful language at all, is always the focus of OIC complaints.
Last year the Secretary General of the OIC, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, issued a warning: “We sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines that should not be crossed” regarding free speech about Islam and terrorism. And he reported success: “The official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues. They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.”
For the first time, an American President has bowed to the OIC’s demands and taken cognizance of that “responsibility.
Klevius comment: Some examples from the real world for the real morons who still don't get it
1. USA: Rifqa Bary, a 17 yr muslim born apostate girl, who is, by the help of islam influenced US (unconstitutional) authorities, exempted from the US constitution & instead has to follow islamic Sharia law, which heavily restricts her freedom to express her opinion abt her own life. This is as much a violation of Human Rights & the Rights of the Child as it gets!
2. UK: An experienced & well renowned foster career was fired by UK authorities because she didn't prevent a 17 yr old muslim girl from leaving islam, i.e. she was supposed to obey islamic Sharia in UK instead of Human Rights. She didn't in any sense contribute to the girls decision yet was supposed to act in accordance with islamic Sharia law in Britain! No freedom of religion in UK.
Still have a problem understanding islam?!
The Holy Negative Human Rights vs OIC's evil Sharia declaration
To understand the primary rock of Human Rights you neeed to understand the Holy Negative HUman Rights which are (so far) best conceptualized by Klevius. However, not all have read Klevius (as yet) so the ignorance abt this basic & crucial foundation of freedom & democracy is still widespread, not the least because of a massive campaign for the belittling of them.
To understand why islam is inevitably doomed to a humiliating extinction you need to understand how the OIC declaration deliberately "misses" the full Human Rights for girls & women. See e.g. Enlightenment vs islamic darkness.
The real islam can't hardly be the dust blowing in the wind that remains after its "reformative" clash with the rock solid Holy Negative Rights (i.e. what Western civilization is built on). Real islam is OIC & a Sharia that is inevitably racist & the opposite to freedom - especially when it comes to girls/women!
So when the "muslim" baroness calls real muslims "idiots" she is a double evil. She pretends being a muslim for her personal gain, yet her vessel labelled 'islam' is empty. She now spits on those taliban who made her career possible. Without islamic jihadism no baroness. By denying islam yet sponging on its name, she betrays both islam & the Holy Negative Right of the Western Civilization.
Wafa Sultan in A God Who Hates: “No one can be a true Muslim and a true American simultaneously.”
G.K Chesterton: “The Crusader would have been quite justified in suspecting the Muslim even if the Muslim had merely been a new stranger; but as a matter of history he was already an old enemy. The critic of the Crusade talks as if it had sought out some inoffensive tribe or temple in the interior of Tibet, which was never discovered until it was invaded. They seem entirely to forget that long before the Crusaders had dreamed of riding to Jerusalem, the Muslims had almost ridden into Paris.”
David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry in Muslim Mafia: “[This book] is about the threat from Shariah Islam and violent jihad propagated by a criminal class of Muslims known as the Muslim Brotherhood, or the ‘Ikhwan mafia.’ This secretive organization dominates most established Muslim groups and mosques in America while, exploiting, manipulating, and even victimizing law-abiding Muslim Americans.”
Jim O'Neil: I’m afraid there’s going to be collateral damage among innocent Muslims, unless they can get past the idea of “When you live here, you think about yourself, and only about yourself.” That attitude is rapidly going to prove useless as a protection.
As Dr. Emmanuel Tanay writes, “The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ is cowed and extraneous. History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. ...As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts—the fanatics who threaten our way of life.”
Extraneous and irrelevant. You are naive, or ignorant if you think otherwise—I mean “ignorant” in its dictionary sense, of being uninformed.
The LSM (Lame Stream Media) is not uninformed, they’re simply following the party line. They are silent on the topic of Islamic terrorism, for the same reason that NOW is silent about the injustices perpetrated upon Muslim women.
The usually vociferous “women’s rights” movement have been meek as mice in this regard, because for the moment, the Fascist Islamic theocracies, and the Global Elitists, are aligned in their determination to destroy America. They each have their own plans on what to replace America with—either (1) a global collective, run by the UN, under the direction of a Global Elite, or (2) a global Islamic Caliphate.