Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, December 03, 2009

Muslim baroness* Sayeeda Warsi: "Non-majority muslims are idiots!"

* CaMORON made her a baroness because she didn't make it democratically! She has a dirty history (see e.g. abt her new muslim husband's ex-wife Massarat Bi - a typical example of islam's ultimate immoral sexism) & is an extreme bigot.


She had to rely on police escort after this!
How come that Koran, history, the guardians of islam, imams, active muslims etc. ALL share the same “extremist view” as Klevius, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders etc?! Not to mention UK bishop Nazir-Ali with Paki roots who resigned because he criticized islam & the Sharia supporting idiot archbishop Rowan Williams.

True muslims see Koran/islam exactly as Klevius does, only they propose it while he warns for it! So Klevius can well be classified as an islamophobe by true muslims & PC people. However, only PC people, not true muslims, can describe Klevius as an extremist.

PC people, on the other hand, try to float somewhere in between, some as political opportunists, others as stealthy & lying muslims who don’t dare to show islam in its entire evilness (i.e. what true muslims call goodness: infidel racism, rapetivism, apostasy ban etc).

BBC & other PC representatives, only see the “islam” & the “muslims” that fit their distorted extremist view on islam, not shared by ANY true muslim who knows abt islam.

Has there ever been such a bad “religion” that has got such a good press as islam?

Upper class PC muslims & the ignorant "muslim idiots"

Sayeeda Warsi, the Conservative peer and shadow minister for community cohesion (also look at what Klevius said 2007abt her islam lover accomplice CaMORON): "They (muslims believing in the Koran & Mohammed) are idiots who do not represent the majority of British Muslims".

Sayful Islam, spokesman for islam4UK: "We are against everything she stands for. She is not a practising muslim. Clearly by looking at her she does not represent Muslims."

Klevius comment: He might have alluded to her bare head or something similar. However this makes me think abt:

An example of islam's evilness embedded in the Koran

Official (PC) translation of Koran 33:59: "Tell your wives, your daughters, and the wives of the believers that they shall lengthen their garments. Thus, they will be recognized (as righteous women) and avoid being insulted"

A non PC translation: “...draw their Jilbabs around them to be recognized as believers and so that no harm will come to them.”

or

"Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons: that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested."

or (the latter part)

"this will be more proper, that they may be known, and thus they will not be given trouble"

"that will be better, so that they may be recognised and not annoyed"

Klevius islam analysis: What should be considered isn't how? but why? Klevius answer: Because islam is an utterly racist & sexist "religion" which encourages insult, defamation, harrassment & molestation of "infidels". So how could the islamic jihadists know who's a muslim woman without a dress code that signalled it.

Cure your bottomless ignorance abt islam:

Origin of islam

Klevius is your best informed source for information on evil islam & its supporters

No comments: