Peter Klevius wonders why BBC's Anna Foster today applied different propaganda on Turkey compared to Romania? After all in both cases a presidential candidate was eliminated!
* 1971 US, on the brink of bankruptcy, violated the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement, and took total dictatorship over the now fiat world dollar. Because of the Cold War and US hegemony, no one dared to protest. And although US then married Saudi islamofascism with the petro-dollar, even that wasn't enough to keep US afloat, so US continued manipulating interest and $-printing in favor of only itself, which move of course sucked its value from the world dollar, leading to enormous pain for the poorest countries, and sent e.g. a growing Latin America into an economic swamp in the 1980s. Similarly a fast growing but equally $-sensitive podt-Maoist China was hit by extreme $-manipulation in the late 1980s, which led to the peaceful protests against higher prices caused by higher interest rates. These protests caused by US selfish and criminal $-manipulations, were then followed by US incited violent rioters (compare Maiden protests in Ukraine 2014), which led to the bloodbath where violent rioters burneed unarmed soldiers in their vehicles, followed by armed ones to stop the rioters. However, nothing of this happened at the Tiananmen Square, and the "tank man" was just a ploy used by media when the troops were already going back after the riots had ended. The Tiananmen Square lies are among the worst examples of US media manipulations. See what really happened!
** Trump understands that China is unstoppable, and that US best option is to abandon EU and keep Russia and China on its side with the help of US remaining (stolen) $-hegemony.
Peter Klevius advices EU to stop its path into the black hole of Russophobic fascist militarism, and instead rather open up towards China. This would benefit EU people as wells as also pushing US into a more reasonable position. A first step should be to stop supporting the wrong side in Taiwan politics.
Taiwan belongs to China and will join when the allure of mainland China gets overwhelming for more than half of the Taiwanese (we are almost there already) in certain views). Taiwan is doomed to fall behind mainland China simply because of size difference etc. And TSMC will inevitably soon lose its position to new technologies from mainland China. China's main interest for including Taiwan - except for the self-evident fact that it is part of China historically, culturally, lingvistically, and legally - is to stop US led military provocations in the sea around Taiwan. Moreover, if China would abandon its superior modern meritocratic system, and apply Taiwanese "democracy" (do remember that modern Taiwan was "founded" by a US supported mass murderer and war criminal) then the outcome would be far less positive. This is why US so desperately tries to increase tensions even more before it's too late!
Hong Kong: GDP (PPP) Per capita $75,128
GDP (nominal*) Per capita $53,165
Taiwan: GDP (PPP) Per capita $72,485
GDP (nominal* Per capita $32,339
* $-equivalent, i.e. generally reflecting the value of US 1971 $-theft.
How EU became neo-Nazi and anti-democratic by siding with with neo-Nazis rooted in the notorious fascist Bandera who declared Ukraine an independent ally to Nazi-Germany when it attacked Russia 1941.
Listen to this CNN video from 2014 and ask yourself why nothing about it is heard on CNN and BBC today.
Obama's detailed plan 2013 to capture Russia's Sevastopol military base on Crimea was the beginning of the evil that culminated in US toppling the democratically elected president and starting eight years of blood bath against Russians in Eastern Ukraine who had already before been ill treated as secondary citizens.
Finland's PM Sanna Marin's 2021 decision to buy 64 US F-35 and in January 2022 to end neutrality by joining Nato against the will of her own party, was probably the main reason Putin asked Ukraine to rethink its Nato membership plans, and when negotiations were denied he started his "special operation" which was a s fas from "unprovoked" and "full scale" as you can get, but rather an attempt to force Ukraine's leadership to the negotiation table. However, US/NATO had already prepared for a proxy war that would make negotiations impossible.
Super Russophobic* Finnish media celebrates as a king the "president" of Europe's most corrupt and neo-fascist "country" which US (Obama administration) lured into a genocidal civil war and then in effect denied Ukraine to negotiate with Russia 2021/2022.
* Unlike equally Russophobic Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Finland has very few Russians, so the behavior of Finnish politicians and media has been truly disgusting and on par with that of the Russophobic Baltic states which politicians EU's dictator von der Leyen & Co have made the leaders of EU warmongering.
During a 2023 interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour, Obama defended his response to Crimea's annexation, saying that the circumstances in Ukraine were not the same as they were when Putin invaded in 2022. "Ukraine of that time was not the Ukraine that we're talking about today," the former president said. "There's a reason there was not an armed invasion of Crimea, because Crimea was full of a lot of Russian speakers, and there was some sympathy to the views that Russia was representing."
Peter Klevius: What a nonsense! 2013 Obama planned to overtake Sevastopol and place US (Nato) nukes there. Then he backed off precisely because of the same reason Putin arranged a referendum among Crimeans whether they wanted Russia to annex it. More than 90% approved. Why? Because of the fascist Ukrainian leadership's genocidal treatment of Russians. Obama administration then toppled Ukraine's elected president and started the bloody civil war against Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine. The official result from the Autonomous Republic of Crimea was a 97 percent vote for integration of the region into the Russian Federation, with an 83 percent voter turnout, and from Sevastopol there was also a 97 percent vote for integration with Russia, with an 89 percent voter turnout. No wonder Obama backed off. However, he then turned to the rest of Ukraine trying the same move he had failed on Crimea.
Read how Peter Klevius solved "the biggest mystery in science".
Read Peter Klevius in-depth research on The Psychosocial Freud Timeline.
Read Peter Klevius Origin of the Vikings from 2005 - now again available after Google deleted it 2014 and again in February 2024.
Peter Klevius (1981, 1992): The ultimate question ought to be: What is it like to be a stone? There's no difference between human consciousness polished through living, and the "consciousness" of a stone that has been smoothly shaped in streaming water against other rocks, stones etc. It started its "life" as a rugged piece of rock in a mountain and adapted to its life in streaming water down hill, or perhaps as a piece of rock falling on a beach and polished by waves.
How US robs the world
* Even if some of the violent rioters really believed that "democracy" would be better for China, history now tells them how wrong they were. Moreover, just consider dollar embezzler (1971-) US reaction if China had become even stronger technologically, economically, politically and morally (if the latter is even possible for a 1.4 billion country)? That wouldn't have extended US stolen hegemony, right.
$-freeloader US extreme anti-China cognitive, financial, militaristic warfare is made possible with US 1971 stolen world dollar hegemony and is a crime against humanity and most people are too busy/ignorant to understand the danger of the cornered US - but instead fear China which offers best consumer goods, infrastructure etc, without imposing its system as US does!
Sadly, many haven't understood the enormity of US financial fraud 1971. And US economists - and some stupid US puppets called "allies" - just "explain" away how US as the only country in the world can prosper and militarize the rest of the world despite constant trade deficit. "We're just so good" is Bloomberg's and others answer!
When US 1971 stole* the world dollar it could manipulate it as it wanted and have the world pay for its trade deficit. However, China is now back and challenges it with superior tech which makes consumers happy. China's capitalist reform got severely hit 1988-89 because of US Feds chock rate increase. That caused havoc in a still extremely vulnerable China on its path out from Maoism.
* 1944 Bretton Woods "agreement" pegged the world dollar to US dollar which was then pegged to gold under US Feds custodianship. 1971 US was bankrupt and arbitrarily violated the gold connection but kept the custody over the world dollar. Although it hit poor countries the most, China was especially vulnerable because it was in an intensive opening-up trade development following Deng Xiaoping's capitalist reform policy.
Peter Klevius analysis of the US controlled media massacre of the truth about the Tiananmen square incident by neglecting cause and effect while producing anti-China* smear.
* No, it's not just CCP! Undemocratic Christian theocracy US uses Sinophobia as synonymous with "democracy", well knowing that the absolute majority of Chinese people don't share the US view on "democracy", although young Chinese in the late 1980s realized the difference in living standard between US and China after Deng Xiaoping opened up the China that Mao had closed. So when US again manipulated the world dollar it hit hard (up to 19% 1989 inflation from 7% 1987) on China's economy.
Peter Klevius agrees with Klaus Schwab (WEF) who said "I respect China's tremendous achievements … over the last forty years. China could act as a role model for many countries, but in the end, each country should be left to make its own decision regarding the system it wants to adopt. We should be very careful in imposing systems but the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries." Peter Klevius: Especially for US!
Wu'er Kaixi (aka Örkesh Dölet) Of Uyghur heritage from Xinjiang had a leading role during the 1989 protests.
Peter Klevius: What did he think about the old Uyghur jihad battle cry "kill the Han and the Hui"?
Summary of Peter Klevius Tiananmen analysis: There were two distinct and mutually exclusive groups of protesters who were not distinguishable by their appearance.
Much of the rioters brutality was the result of Beijing’s decision on June 2 to send in unarmed soldiers to clear the Square. The unarmed soldiers were set upon immediately by rioters around the Square waiting for the chance to attack the soldiers. Beijing’s armed battalions were sent in later.
US Embassy daily reports of what was happening at the time.
The US Embassy report for June 4 notes:
“the beating to death of a PLA soldier, who was in the first APC to enter Tiananmen Square, in full view of the other waiting PLA soldiers, appeared to have sparked the shooting that followed.”
So it was the rs, not the government soldiers, that started the bloody confrontation.
State Department chroniclers continue their unbiased summary of events:
“.. the initial moves against the students suggested to many that the Chinese leadership was still, as of the morning of June 3, committed to a relatively peaceful resolution to the crisis.”
From there we go to:
“fascinating eyewitness accounts of the disorganized and confused retreat of PLA soldiers from the center of Beijing after their advance on Tiananmen Square was halted by crowds of demonstrators on the morning of June 3.’ ..the soldiers were ridiculed by Chinese citizens and scolded by elderly women who called them “bad boys” and “a disgrace to the PLA.”
On the day after, on June 4, however: “thousands of civilians (rioters - not peaceful protesters) stood their ground or swarmed around military vehicles. APCs were set on fire, and demonstrators besieged troops with rocks, bottles, and Molotov cocktails.”
Media reports confirmed this rioters violence.
According to the Wall Street Journal of June 4:
“As columns of tanks and tens of thousands soldiers approached Tiananmen many troops were set on by angry mobs … [D]ozens of soldiers were pulled from trucks, severely beaten and left for dead. At an intersection west of the square, the body of a young soldier, who had been beaten to death, was stripped naked and hung from the side of a bus. Another soldier’s corpse was strung at an intersection east of the square.”
Even ABC, later to one-sidedly dramatize cruelties by government forces, describes how in front of the Australian embassy a PLA solder was beaten to death, disembowelled and left with his penis stuck in his mouth.
But those who condemn government violence at Tiananmen need to explain the seeming hatred of the government among protesters that triggered Tiananmen events .
Chai Ling, like many other Tianamen rioters became Christian and welcomed in US. Listen to her video to measure her bloodthirstiness - and cowardice.
The "tank man" hoax*
Cui Guozheng, was an unarmed cook in the 348th Regiment of the 116th Division. He was murdered by rioters because he did not stay close enough with the other troops.
No comments:
Post a Comment