Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Sunday, June 04, 2017

An "aspect of islam" is the very origin* of islam: Islamofascist Saudi merchants of racism, sexism, hate and death.


* Mohammad suggested his followers to spread islam through terror.

Allah, his messenger, his islamic hate spreading Saudi custodians - and due reproduction of hateful muslims who think sharia islam must be great cause even Theresa May and other non-muslim politicians say so.




BBC's guest today, Haras Rafiq of the Quilliam Foundation: It was an islamist attack inspired by "some aspects of islam". They were muslims. Only way is preventing by naming and shaming the ideology.

Klevius: There's no serious researcher in the history of islam that would deny that the original spread of islam was solely based on robbery and booty rewards incl. taxation under the sword and enslavement of those who couldn't pay and sex enslavement of girls.

However, Muslim Council of Britain: They don't respect islam.

Klevius: Islam doesn't respect the most basic of Human Rights. And this disrespect is exactly what you and they "respect".

The reformist and moderating voices are shut down by hard-line Saudi sponsored Sunni extremism and their useful idiot, fellow travellers like the Soros-funded Hope not Hate which demonise not only so called "islamophobes" but even "practicing muslims" for daring to oppose Sharia islam.

5Pillars (an UK based islamist organization): Go to any mosque or Muslim community centre in the UK and mention Quilliam – you will receive a universal disapproval bordering on hostility. Rafiq had the audacity to totally distance Quilliam’s US operation to the UK one, essentially claiming that they were completely different outfits. How depressing that the Select Committee, short on time, did not probe this point further; surely in the inter-connected world we live in, the same organisation across two different countries cannot divorce its theory or extremist connections from each other.

Klevius: Do you see the irony in this muslim bigotry and hypocrisy?

BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain who learned to talk "Western style" at Cambridge, doesn't care about muslim attire and doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol - yet seems unable to address the core issue of the problem with islamic hate, racism and sexism, i.e. sharia islam (meaning sidestepping, whenever possible, Human Rights). Such a behavior is in the civilized world based on Human Rights considered bigoted and hypocritical. So here again some aspects you'd never hear from her:




In Dec 2016 over a thousand "British" muslims took to the streets of London in a show of force, blocking off a central London square to call for a caliphate while the crowd chanted ‘Allahu Akbar’. We need a Caliph who will clean up these streets. Who will smack up armies and who will back beef [fighting]. Backhand your missiles back to your land, that’s the plan. World domination at hand. We can expand and take out these fools.
Those were the words of a poet invited to address the raucous crowd outside the Syrian Embassy in central London who cheered and yelled Allahu Akbar





No comments: