Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, April 28, 2017

When should islam/its "custodians" (i.e. those who have and still benefit from islam induced evil) pay for its genocides, colonialism, enslavement, institutional rapetivism etc, throughout 1,400 years?


Useful idiots and bigoted/hypocritical cowards is what keeps evil sharia islam ticking


However, instead of answering this most relevant question today, BBC and other media and politicians desperately shun the real evil of Saudi steered sharia islam that is easily discovered by anyone openminded enough to see through the islamofascist Saudi boosted sandstorm of "islamophobia" accusations, through its many sharia hubs such as OIC/UN, mosques, Saudi steered media, universities, politicians etc..

BBC seems to use islam's oldest trick in the book, i.e. inviting/threatening with terror against those who dare to criticize sharia islam's lack of the most basic Human Rights.

According to Pamela Geller, a Jew that was denied entry to the UK by Theresa May (who says sharia is good for the Brits and who dislikes Human Rights), a muslim is threatening critics of islamofascism by "warning" them.



BBC's disgusting hypocrisy and bigotry in the service of evil Human Rights violating sharia islam

Today BBC asked UKIP's leader Paul Nuttall whether he would allow Ann Mari Waters campaigning for the party because she says exactly what not only the European Court of Human Rights say but also what islam's own worldwide sharia organization OIC say, namely that sharia islam is incompatible with Human Rights.

Klevius question to BBC's muslim sharia* presenter Michal Husain and her co-"reporters": Instead of exposing individuals to muslim (some of them mentally disturbed others ideologically/islam disturbed) islam/Koran/Mohammad induced sharia violence threats to brave individuals who defend Human Rights equality, why don't you support a wide front against islamofascism? It's the lowest of cowardice behavior to direct a general threat against the free world on the shoulders of a few "islamophobes".

* There's no islam without sharia that violates the most basic of Human Rights! This is the very core of the matter with islam - and therefore blamed on "islamophobes". And in Mishal Husain's (and many others) case it's deeply immoral to out of cowardice sell oneself as a "muslim" while happily eating the fruits of everything opposite to sharia islamic evil. She wittingly swims in polluted waters protected by Human Rights and the "1.6 Billion muslims" Potemkin village. And she would probably stand safe in a crowd confronted by a muslim terrosist who asks if she is a muslim.






BBC's muslim "diversity" presenter, who was raised in Saudi Arabia and who learned to talk and appear contemporary "PC posh" at Cambridge, BBC etc., says she doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, nor does she want to wear islamic clothing.

Extremely bigoted and hypocritical Mishal Husain rightly says there's no threat to her way of life (as long she doesn't commit apostasy, that is), while Klevius says that's entirely thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam.

Interestingly, BBC's muslim sharia presenter Michal Husain usually keeps a low profile in certain islam issues while instead talking about e.g. housing. And as usual, BBC manages to fake its reporting by naming only "Chinese" as the buyers of London properties while the muslim Gulf states and oil wealthy muslims for long have been and are the main property investors and buyers of holiday homes for themselves while visiting London in the most thought after London areas. And unlike most Chinese investors the muslim investors carry with them a stench of Human Rights violating sharia islam. Even the UK Parliament faces this if moving to such a sharia property.

Financial muslim sharia oil wealth ghettos in London.


Over the last decade, the Arab muslim oil wealth funds from muslim Gulf countries have bought some of the most iconic and historic properties and whole blocks in prime areas of London like Mayfair, Chelsea, South Kensington, Knightsbridge, Belgravia, Holland Park, and Notting Hill.

Many muslim investors like the Saudi/Jeddah-based sharia bank, Sidra Capital, are also acquiring historic neighborhoods, as in Hamilton Drive, a 1.2 hectare development in St John’s Wood consisting of 10 luxury town houses and a villa, close to what used to be the Beatles Abbey Road Studios.

These oil wealthy muslims have also in recent years been increasingly buying properties in London as holiday homes for their stays there.

Andrew Prince, the British Business Group Dubai and Northern Emirates Director of Focus Groups: 'There have been very close historical, cultural and economic relationships between the Gulf countries and the UK over the last four decades, and these continue to strengthen with time. These relationships have developed over generations and have resulted in, among many other things, a desire to invest in the UK, and specifically London which many Arabs would consider their home-away-from-home, and to where there are now a staggering number of daily flights arriving from the GCC.'

No comments: