Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Sunday, March 05, 2017

Why are long time EU residents in UK (who weren't even allowed to vote about it) pushed back while Commonwealth people are welcomed with proposed signs - and Commonwealth residents had the right to vote about it?

EU citizens who moved to UK after UK ratified the EU treaty have been cheated by Theresa May.

Building a new British empire caliphate based on sharia - and with London as its sharia capital


Does Theresa May's 'sharia is good for the Brits' give a clue?

Peter Klevius: Which Brits? English Atheists or Christians? Not at all. Muslim Commonwealth "Brits"? And which muslim Commonwealth "Brits". Poor and uneducated muslims brainwashed with islamism? Hardly. So what about well educated muslims brainwashed with islamism, like so many top of the line muslim terrorists have turned out to be - and only Allah knows how many"non-violent" yet equally hateful highly educated muslims there are poisoning the lives for non-muslims in a variety of ways? Yet more "diversity" (meaning more muslims) is repeatedly asked for.

UK treats EU citizens in an appalling and undemocratic way.


Brits in EU and Commonwealth people in UK all had a democratic vote - EU citizens in UK had not.

Most people from Commonwealth countries are either muslims or Hindus. And as only islam has sharia, "diversity" in praxis means more Human Rights violating islamic influence.

And BBC (the British Broadcasting Caliphate) eagerly spreads muslim propaganda over ignorant Brits - those who aren't ignorant are silenced as "islamophobes" etc.


The poorest countries in the world are usually muslim ones or at least devastated by islam in the past. Only slaves and "Western" oil money have kept muslim countries wealthy.


Stopping support for the Human Rights violating war crimes committing islamofascist Saudi dictator family is the only longterm road to peace in Mideast.

 Saudi based and steered OIC's member states with year of accession (CW indicates Commonwealth and % indicates were muslims constitute a minority).

Afghanistan     1969
Albania     1992
Algeria     1969
Azerbaijan     1991
Bahrain     1970
  CW Bangladesh     1974
Benin    1982 24.5 % (OW: 23.5 %) Muslims
  CW Brunei Darussalam     1984
Burkina Faso     1975
CW Cameroon    1975 20 % (OW: 26 %)
Chad    1969
Comoros    1976
Cote d'Ivoire    2001 40,6 % (OW: 41.8 %)
Djibouti    1978
Egypt     1969
Gabon    1974 10,2 % (OW: 10 %)
The Gambia    1974
Guinea    1969
Guinea-Bissau    1974
  CW Guyana    1998 7,5 % (OW: 9.4 %)
Indonesia    1969
Iran    1969
Iraq    1976
Jordan    1969
Kazakhstan    1995
Kuwait    1969
Kyrgyzstan    1992
Lebanon    1969
Libya    1969
  CW Malaysia     1969
  CW Maldives    1976
Mali    1969
Mauritania    1969
Morocco    1969
  CW Mozambique    1994 17,5, % (OW: 18.6 %)
Niger    1969
  CW Nigeria    1986 45,5 % (OW: 45.1 %)
Oman    1970
  CW Pakistan    1969
Palestine State (proposed)    1969
Qatar    1970
Saudi Arabia    1969
Senegal    1969
  CW Sierra Leone    1972
Somalia     1969
Sudan    1969
Surinam    1996 15,9 % (OW: 16.9 %)
Syria    1970
Tajikistan    1992
Togo    1997
Tunisia    1969
Turkey    1969
Turkmenistan    1992
  CW Uganda    1974 11,7 % (OW: 11.5 %)
United Arab Emirates     1970
Uzbekistan    1995
Yemen    1969
The OIC Observer States
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Turkish Cypriot State


Klevius: Is this really the will of people in UK? If so, then Europe again harbors a delivery room for fascism - although now in a new location.














No comments: