Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, February 07, 2017

Instead of distinguishing between evil* muslims and civilized Human Rights "muslims"**, friendly fire seems to be the most populist solution.

* 'Evil' is here based on what historians tell us about early islam.

** If you prefer you can have the quotation marks on the former. However, Klevius departs from the origin of islam, which, according to history as well as muslims' own texts, was all about looting, enslaving, raping etc..

UK's speaker of the House pf Commons can't stand President Trump because "he's racist and sexist" - but has no problem with ultra-racist and ultra-sexist muslim supremacy.

The bigoted and hypocritical UK speaker of the House, John Bercow, who has had multple problems with tax payers money, and who has no problem whatsoever to invite some of the worst Human Rights violators the world of today knows about. 

 Article 2 of Kuwait's constitution identifies islamic sharia as a main source of legislation. So for example, before a family court the testimony of a woman is worth half of that of a man. Kuwait also blocks web content "prohibited by Sharia" - i.e. Kuwait blocks criticism against sharia when it violates Human Rights.

Why fight President Trump when the real enemy is basic Human Rights violating sharia islam?

Or is it precisely therefore? It's so much easier to spit on Trump, isn't it. A blond, "white", "right-wing" (although he isn't nearly as "right-wing" as his party) President who wants to tackle the biggest problem of our time - sharia islam.

Trump is the perfect target for those defending islamofascism while having run out of decent arguments for it.

 Is Trump against women's equal rights?

We don't know exactly where he stands (except for the stupid dress code of course, which he shares with possibly most men and women - but not with Klevius). However, he clearly isn't far away from ordinary male UK PMs - and miles better than the Saudi islamofascists.

 Is Trump a racist? No, there's nothing indicating this. His ban isn't against muslims but against fundamentalist muslims who hate America.

Klevius repeats his suggestion since 9/11: Only accept muslims who share a civilized and logical Human Rights equality as already stated in the 1948 Human Rights declaration against all kinds of fascisms and totalitarian ideologies - incl. islamofascism.

No comments: