Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

British Nationalist Party (BNP) must be very proud of Theresa May's hate speeches that has let loose nationwide British racism against EU citizens.

When will UK apply same hate crime and "diversity" policies to protect EU citizens as are already in place for muslims? And what about cowardice British racists who gladly verbally, institutionally or sometimes even physically attack EU citizens but who wouldn't dare to do the same against muslims?

Scandinavia's biggest news paper Aftonbladet: Racism against Swedes in London after Brexit.



Swedish EU Minister: "I'm chocked."

Klevius (who is born in Saltsjöbaden/Sweden but has a Finnish passport): I'm not!

 Theresa May's hate campaign and support of hateful* sharia muslims is furthermore boosted by BBC's hate propaganda against EU citizens for the purpose of defending muslim sharia racism/sexism.

* Basic Human Rights violating sharia is for muhammadans who believe in the evil deeds of Muhammad, the most important part of their "religion" and aim for full implementation asap.

This is how Sun looked like in January 2014 - plus some editing by Klevius.

Actually, the years leading up to Brexit were filled with hateful rhetoric purposefully directed against EU citizens while most of the people where fed up with hateful sharia muslim immigrants.

Klevius - whose default state of color and sex blindness paired with his basic Human Rights commitment protects him - was all for Brexit - without basic Human Rights violating sharia Muhammadism (aka islam). Theresa May seems to be the very opposite.

Racist, useless and "fake" British passports


Moreover, Theresa May isn't only a racist and a lousy deal maker (miles after Trump whom she used to spit on) but she is also surrounded by intellectually less gifted and fanatically more gifted "advisors".

She also seems to be quite good (already as Home Secretary) at removing rights from "foreigners" in a deliberately stealthy and deceptive manner. So for example, is it a well known fact that British passports are of no value whatsoever for most people not born in UK (also note how many muslim terrorists are born in UK) simply because the slightest legal mistake makes them useless for Brits not born in UK and therefore vulnerable to be deported to their country of birth.

And this is made much more insidious by the fact that an application for a UK passport (if you're stupid enough to make the huge effort and humiliation of the process - which UK born muslim terrorists and sharia supporters etc. don't have to - plus paying the high fees) is made by the Devil's attorney.

The information needed to be signed ought to cover everything and should be detailed to an extent that is completely impossible for most people to cover. So they either make something up or blank it. And in doing so they are, if Theresa May or someone else wants to use it, an easy target for deportation already on the grounds of having given "false" information - no matter how exemplary they otherwise are.

And that's not all. Unlike British born citizens, "foreign born" UK citizens can be deported on the insidious "not being conducive to British interests". "British interest" varies with time and who happens to be in power and should not be used as a tool for institutional racism in a modern democracy based on basic Human Rights.

Theresa May used the very ideology she so eagerly defends as an excuse to rob Brits from the most basic Human Rights. She could easily have deported muslim hate preachers without leaving the European Court of Human Rights. How? Simply by utilizing that very same court's decision to declare sharia islam incompatible with Human Rights values. But she chose not to. Why? Klevius guess is that that would have revealed the true nature of that Muhammadanism (aka sharia islam) that so many muslims adhere to.


 Theresa May is rather a friend with hateful (see asterisk above) sharia muslims and their catastrophic countries of origins than with non-muslim people and countries.


And she seems especially interested in the world's worst spreader of islamic hate and suffering, i.e. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


How much do the British Brexit racists really benefit from May's cooperation with the islamofascist war crime and Human Rights crimes committing Saudi dictator family and London's financial manipulations?





.

No comments: