Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

While Trump in a couple of days eases tension between super powers, Theresa May hasn't after half a year figured out what Brexit means.


However, Theresa May "knows" that the Brits need more sharia and less "islamophobia"




With these "allies" she certainly isn't "islamophobic" - but how many Brits (incl. non-sharia "muslims") share her view? And what about the economy?

Trump talks to Russia but May (and BBC) wants confrontation with the world's second military and space super power - although only 12th in financial power. However, how wise is it to prefer confrontation instead of cooperation with the world's largest country with endless resources yet to be explored and utilized - starting with its strategic position between China and EU/UK.

India buys six times more technological products from China than it manages to sell. What would May like to import? Gems, clothing, chemicals or perhaps students - incl. some 15-20% muslim ones. Is that what the Brits wanted with Brexit - more muslim immigration?

Budget > Revenues:   
India  $172.10 billion Ranked 23th.    
Russia $416.80 billion Ranked 12th.   

On the foreign debt list UK is among the worst hit. Does May need a better financial advisor!


Is defending the most basic Human Rights against islamofascist sharia all that's needed to be classified as "right-wing extremist" and "islamophobe"?


Nowadays defending the most basic of Human Rights against islamofascist sharia totalitarianism seems to be enough to be labeled "far right". And if you happen to be too pale to classify as "colored", you will automatically be labeled "white supremacist" on top of it. Not to mention if you're a man and older than thirty and - God forbid - a deplorable non-zo ialist Atheist without any other moral guidance than the crazy thought about equality for all - incl. women.

The dirty gray zone of islam - created by PC "diversity" and "islam is a great relgion" and "that's not islam" and "there's only one islam"rhetoric - is the open gate to Koranic sharia fascism, racism and sexism.

Who is more "koranic"? BBC's muslim sharia presenter Saudi raised Mishal Husain, who doesn't fast on Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol etc., or the Saudi sponsored Islamic State and Saudi based and steered muslim world organization OIC with its basic Human Rights violating sharia declaration in UN? Do they all fit in islam? And if not, who has to go?

Mishal Husain: My way of life under no threat. Klevius: Thanks to Human Rights - not sharia!

According to Google 'racist muslims' don't exist - only "islamophobes".


Klevius question: Who created these "muslim communities" which are so extremely "sensitive"? And how come that muslims are always "targeted by "islamophobes" but never the other way round? And all these attacks by muslims around the world shouting "allahu akbar" and trying to stab people's necks etc?

When is it right for non-muslims to be offended?

Or why not do as Klevius has proposed since 9/11: Criminalize every Human Rightsophobic muslim who is racist and sexist based on a fascist koranic sharia ideology that violates the civilized idea about Human Rights equality. Because those "muslims" who share Human Rights equality pose no risk at all - except for islam's own survival of course.

No comments: