Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of the Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, July 07, 2016

The Tory party makes its utmost to leave its members to choose only between candidates positive to Human Rights violating sharia and the hate mongering Saudi dictator family.


Michael Gove was the only one opposing the disgusting cooperation between UK and the Saudi dictator family. So of course he is now heavily opposed by his own, despite the fact that he is by far the best candidate for becoming a UK PM.


Blowing up a "stabbing in the back" story against Michael Gove, the by far best suited and experienced PM candidate, is as low as it can get. Especially considering that none of those Tories would have backed Boris Johnson anyway - probably even used same type of tactics against him had he been a candidate.

These two sharia supporting friends of the Saudi dictator family are what the Brits have been offered as main PM candidates by the Tory party.


It's not "religious intolerance" that causes the problems in Mideast - it's just one religion called islam used by its "custodian", the evil Saudi dictator family who happens to be West's "closest ally" over there. See the problem?



Islamic sharia (aka "islamic finance") is a tool for overriding basic Human Rights in a way that uses 1.6 billion "muslims" worldwide as an excuse for whatever sharia application. In the case of the"custodians of islam", i.e. the Saudi dictator family, they have used "muslimhood" worldwide as an excuse for the most appalling hate mongering and spread of islamic terrorism for the sole purpose of safeguarding their own dictatorship and oil fortunes.


Islam started in Medina with the slaughtering of all the Jews there who didn't convert to Mohammad's ideology of "conquest" through robbing, looting and raping.This is the origin and essence of islam. This is also why islam is so fit for evil acts - no matter if the actor is calle the Islamic State or Saudi Arabia.

Islamic terrorist attacks are purely religious. They are seen as "a sacrament ... intended to restore to the universe a moral order that had been corrupted by the enemies of Islam." It is neither political or strategic but an "act of redemption" meant to "humiliate and slaughter those who defied the hegemony of God."

Isn't it strange that only in islamic countries do we have these types of problems after a war. We saw nothing like this in Japan or Germany after World War2. And these kind of problems seem to follow muslim populations - not Germans , Japanese, Vietnamese, Chinese etc non-muslim populations.

BBC's disgustingly bigoted and hypocritical islam propaganda


It's said there are less than 5% muslims in UK. How come then that some half or more of religious reporting etc is by muslims and about islam in BBC?













No comments: