Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Will Erdogan accuse "islamophobia" for the Istanbul muslim terrorist attack?


Islamofascism creeping up from Mideast through Turkey assisted by visa free EU travel for muslim jihadis and boosted by EU's campaign against "islamophobia".



Klevius: You're right Mr Erdogan, there's only one islam. Islam as an ideology that creates division, contempt and hate and triggers legal (sharia) racism and physical (jihad) violence. But over all, an ideology that keeps half the population in sex apartheid.

Right after the British voted for Brexit, Erdoğan declared that Turkey may also go to referendum to decide to end negotiations with the EU and claimed that the EU was refusing to accept Turkey as a member because of its religion, islam.

Thanks to EU's frenetic campaign against so called "islamophobia" (i.e. defense for Human Rights*) Erdoğan and his islamist/nationalist followers feel powerful enough that they don’t need anymore to pretend to be democrats who believe in universal values.

* British and other nationalist politicians have frenetically agitated against Human Rights and "islamophobia" while simultaneously trying to paint a picture of "islamophobes" as synonymous with "right-wing nationalists" fascists, Nazis (sic) etc.

Norms and values like human rights and freedoms are being perceived as hindrances on the way to the New Turkey Project, and the EU link is thought to weaken their political power, due to The European Court of Human Rights decision to declare sharia incompatible with Human Rights.

A weakened EU is utilized by Turkish islamofascists. However, with less "islamophobia" demagogy and more emphasize on Human Rights EU could help secular Turkey back on track.


Klevius wrote:


Monday, December 24, 2012

Turkish PM Erdogan: There's no moderate islam. Klevius: There's no moderate Sharia!


Why do most media avoid the word 'Sharia' when dealing with Egypt's constitution? 



Article 219: “The principles of Islamic Sharia include general evidence and fundamentalist bases, rules and jurisprudence, as well as sources accepted by doctrines of Sunni Islam and the majority of Muslim scholars.”

It's also said that Al-Azhar University, the most authoritative Sunni institution, is to be “consulted on all matters related to Sharia”.

Although The constitution doesn't directly mandate Sharia Law’s most medieval criminal punishments (so far). this fact doesn't, in any way, alter Sharia's incompatibility with the freedom part of the Universal Human Rights.

OIC's Sharia conflict in UN with Human Rights reflects what so many try to deny -  the evil racist/sexist origin of true islam!

Every country that supports OIC supports islamofascism.

Islam only supports one way democracy


Some 30% of those allowed to vote actually voted in Egypt. Only less than 20% of those allowed to vote then voted for Sharia. And of these, most ignorant muslim women just followed that very same Sharia they had previously in practice already lived under and therefore had to obey under their husbands and imams.

They were thus already shut out from the door to freedom before it was even opened.
.








No comments: