Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Was it islam that caused the crash? And why isn't the statisticallly most likely scenario even contemplated among main media?


The Germanwings A320 didn't crash in a "remote section of the French Alps" but in the nuclear heartland of France

Route D107, Alpes de Haute Provence


In the case of the pilot flying the aircraft being incapacitated, the door will automatically open after a set period of time if the correct code is entered. However, in the event a pilot flying the aircraft does not want the other pilot to enter the flight deck, the one in the cockpit has the ability to block entry if he reacts before the door would be opened automatically. If the person on the other side of the door says ‘no’, you can’t get in. The doors are bolted and heavily protected and it would likely be impossible to break it down within minutes, even if passengers or flight attendants assisted. If a crew member locks down the flight deck with the manual doors, nothing will open it.

Klevius comment: No matter what turns out to have been the cause it again seems that muslims are more protected from suspicions than non-muslims. Had it been a mosque fire media would have been filled with "right wing terrorist susoects".


See for example the Swedish "arson mosque attack" that later turned out to be completely the result of the muslims themselves (insurance fraud while simultaneously blaming "right wing racists"?).

Klevius wrote:

Saturday, December 27, 2014

Naive Swedes "love-bomb" terrorist labeled mosque


Islam means sharia and sharia is ALWAYS and in whatever form, against the most basic of Human Rights



Muslim "freedom fighters" to "moderate" imam: "What is your problem with the Islamic State? You are on the wrong path!"

"Moderate" imam: "The Islamic State. It is like an invisible arm, coming to poison the wells where our children drink. We are losing something precious. We are losing our young people."

Klevius: It's not the Islamic State - it's the ideology of islam! The very same ideology you pretend to blink for the purpose of not severing the money flow from the naive infidels who feed and support you.

The "moderate" versions of communism* had to rename (e.g. social-democracy, national-socialism etc) so to hide it's evil roots. Yes, "socialism" looked attractive for many an intellectual in the 20th century as long as they hadn't seen it in full scale praxis (see eg the most important sociological paper from the last century, Angels of Antichrist - social state vs kinship, which describes state parasitism.

* Whereas revolutionary communism is pure evil, state communism and state socialism may not always appear equally evil. However, they don't work either (compare China's leaders who in the 1980s realized this simple fact).





A Swedish foot shot triggered by naive(l) islamophilia


Was it muslims playing with fireworks or an attack from rival muslims? What seems clear though is that the most unlikely scenario is prioritized by the Minister of Immigration, Swedish TV, Aftonbladet etc. 

BBC 25 December 2014 updated at 18:48: Swedish mosque hit by arson in Eskilstuna, injuring five. Police are treating the incident as arson after reports that someone threw an object into the building.

Nothing whatsoever indicated any "anti-muslim"* forces behind the fire.

* Just like islamic violence serves the spread of islam (jihad) "anti-muslim" violence (so rare so it almost doesn't exist in any meaningful sense compared to islamic violence) also fulfills the same purpose.

Klevius: However, this is how Scandinavia's biggest news paper described it:



Sweden's Minister for Justice: An appalling evil deed 


Sweden's Minister for Justice and Migration (!), Morgan Johansson: 'Hard to believe anything else than that this aggregated assault was directed against muslims as a group and islam as a religion.'

Klevius: A Swedish Minister for Justice acting like a teen troll who would have been immediately arrested had it been the other way round!


Swedish TV: The arson attack against the mosque in Eskilstuna shows, according to Islamiska förbundets leader Omar Mustafa, how hate against muslims has intensified.

Klevius: Reminds me of an old joke from the 1980s: A Finn tells a Swede that Finland has increased its asylum quota from Africa by 100%. The Swede: 'Gee, so now you have already two Africans over there.



Omar Mustafa, leader of the Islamiska Förbundet i Sverige(IFIS - a terrorist organization according to, for example, UAE): ”Man har gått från ord till handling.” (They have moved from words to action).

Klevius: Who are 'they'? Islamic State?!

The mosque belongs to the Dawah movement known for close connections to the Islamic State.

It also seems that the mosque has been attacked in the past by other muslims.

It's also reported that a boy living nearby told his father that Somalis played with fireworks ('smällare', i.e. crackers)  inside the mosque.

The injured seem to have been a little Somali boy who injured his hand with some crackers and someone who broke his feet when jumping from a balcony.

All of this is of course just rumors but still interesting. Klevius would definitely suggest first eliminating a hypothetical scenario where playing with fireworks caused the fire (perhaps just before prayer time) and then a cover up effort for insurance made possible by the Swedish islamophilia dhimmis eagerly waiting for "mosque attacks".


Tuesday, December 09, 2014

Why did Google suddenly swap LA arson with terror warnings blamed on Bush?!


A muslim apostate "president" and Google's AI robots defending and protecting islamofascism


From being the main news the LA fire in no time completely disappeared from Google's front news page when it was suspected the fire was a terrorist act. And at the same time an alternative reason was pushed forward to heighten muslim terrorist alert.

Dear reader, you are cheated again in the very same way as you were cheated to elect muslim  (apostate?!) born (muslim genitor Obama) and raised (muslim adopted dad Soetoro) mr X "president" Barry Barakeh Hussain Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever)!







Tuesday, December 30, 2014

If you call for islam you inevitably also call for evil islam (i.e. the original islam)


OIC, the islamofascist  monster that hijacked UN which was supposed to be our bulwark against such totalitarian fascism


Why are muslims and Saudi islamofascists equally protected from criticism against their senseless Human Rights violations?


In fact, Human Rights are considered terrorism by the Saudi islamofascist dictator family - and by OIC.


Why are we afraid of veiled people? Klevius: Because they so often* turn out to be racist** muslims who hate us! But a more important question is what and who incite such islamofascist hatred?

* Compare the widespread muslim support for al-Qaeda, Islamic State, and numerous lesser muslim organizations and individuals.

** You're a racist (not to mention you're sexist too) if you're a muslim adhering to any type of sharia because sharia is against the most basic of the Universal Human Rights (compare how  OIC - all muslims world Ummah - had to violate Human Rights for the purpose of keeping Human Rights violating islamic sharia)  and disparaging non-muslims which they call "infidels" etc. And in doing this, muslims open themselves up for criticism. But not even this can be tolerated by racist/sexist muslims who want to criminalize criticism against their own violations against Universal Human Rights!



Abu Dhabi's burqa hiding muslim woman murdered a non-muslim mother in the restroom while the victim's two young children waited outside. Abu Dhabi encourages islam and sharia - so why do people even go there?




Eager convert proselytizer  Myriam Francois-Cerrah applauds islam while islam's guardian Saudi Arabia jails and lashes Raif Badawi fordaring to talk about Human Rights.


Without any objection heard there's a lot of racist and sexist smear going on against "white males" as a group - however not much against islamofascist Arab oil billionaires clad in sun/sand protecting Bedouin head scarves (indoors)! Why?!




Right, they belong to that overly protected vulnerable and easily offended "minority" called muslims who are under attack from a very few peaceful (but apparently so dangerous and disgusting) Human Rights defenders (i.e. not sharia compliant) called "islamophobes".

Raif Badawi is such an "islamophobe" whose friends and family now have chosen to distance themselves from or even turning against him. In other words, they have, like so many others, helped the Saudi islamofascists instead of a Human Rights defender.


Badawi did nothing wrong according to Western standards other than start a forum that was aimed at "a new generation of Saudi young men and women, who want to express themselves in a way that they can counter the overwhelming majority of clerics and religious people."

Now he has to kneel on the ground and receive 50 lashes every week until he has received 1,000 lashes. Happy now Myriam Francois-Cerrah? Right, Klevius almost forgot that the very fact that Saudi Arabia is the guardian of islam makes it having nothing to do with islam in your perverted thinking?





.

No comments: