Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Thursday, December 25, 2014

2014 - the year when muslim hatred against Human Rights peaked


Telling ‘the truth in love’


Klevius approach to mankind is and has always been love. And there can not be a better tool for universal love than the Universal Human Rights declaration. However, such love of the equality principle has now by evil forces been named "hate" while criticism against islamic hatred is called "islamophobia".

Muslim haters reject Human Rights - but do all muslims hate Human Rights?


Klevius answer: If you by 'muslims' mean sharia supporting muslims the answer is definitely yes. However, if you include as "muslims" those who reject sharia in all Human Rights violating forms, then Klevius and the majority of muslim top clerics as well as Saudi based and Saudi steered muslim world organization OIC don't see them as real muslims. According to Saudi Arabia and OIC some of the most basic of Human Rights are seen as grave criminal offenses against "islamic human rights" (sharia).
 


Supreme Court of Canada: 'speech may only be deemed hateful when assessed to be so objectively from the perspective of a reasonable person, with full consideration of the circumstances'

Klevius: Which makes sharia support a form of hate speech!

Under Human Rights a woman may choose to lead a sharia style life if she so wishes. However, under sharia women may no.

The "islamophobia" campaigners continue protecting the worst ever ideological crime on the planet! Why?!

Facebook: Our mission has always been to make the world more open and connected. We seek to provide a platform where people can share and surface content, messages and ideas freely, while still respecting the rights of others.

Klevius: This (i.e. Human Rights) is the foundation on which everything Klevius writes firmly stands on. In other words, the only muslims who could possibly be offended are those who support or commit Human Rights violations.

Facebook: While there is no universally accepted definition of hate speech, as a platform we define the term to mean direct and serious attacks on any protected category of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or disease.

Klevius: So "infidels", i.e. non religious people are not protected. But muslim terrorists and Human Rights violators are!? Or is it just some muslims (who? sharia rejecting "muslims"?!).





The Islamic State constitutes a perfect time machine for those who want to understand the origin of islam


Islam, an ideology originating in and based on parasitism (e.g. slavery) and terror (jihad), is a monstrous hate crime throughout 1,400 years. Its victims can be counted in hundreds of millions (possibly as many as there are muslims today). Its Sharia is ALWAYS against Human Rights. Yet criticism of islam is called "islamophobia"!






'Telling the truth  with love', however, doesn't necessitate you to love the open or silent haters


Islamic State says it is prepared to murder as many non-muslims as it takes - no matter how many hundreds of millions. And the number of their supporters among silent muslims is high and counting.


The difference between hateful muslims and Klevius is that Klevius doesn't ask for retaliation - just the right to exist on an equal level with everyone else on the planet.



 So when muslim born (apostate?!)* Mr X** "president"*** Hussain**** Obama Soetoro (or whatever)***** wants to criminalize criticism of islamic hate speech, he has made himself sharia compliant and therefore against Human Rights.

* Born to a muslim father who hadn't committed apostasy (the worst crime in islam) made him a muslim. Moreover, he was also raised as a muslim because his adoptive father Soetoro was a muslim.
** All his records are labeled secret.
*** His mother was too young as the only US parent for to fulfill the constitutional criterion. He listened for some 20 years to one of the worst black supremacist racists' preachings. He used the race card in the election and he has violated the spirit of the US Constitution ever since.
**** more in line with his muslim heritage
***** sarcasm








.

No comments: