Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Saturday, November 22, 2014

An attacking "peaceful religion"


Human Rights means diversity - islam/sharia means the very opposite! The only diversity islam knows about is its various ways to attack!


Syed Sadaqat Hussain, November 09, 2014: I always find hard to write on blasphemy because I am afraid to be a victim of the wrath of the so called illiterate pseudo Ulema among the Muslims, who have made my country (Pakistan) a hell for humans. Since 1980s, when the military dictator Gen. Muhammad Zia ul-Haq updated the old colonial laws that criminalized “insulting the religion of any class of persons”, the advantage of this law is being taken by the illiterate clerics of this country who can mobilize seventy percent illiterate people of this country against the minorities.

Klevius question to BBC's Pakistani (but brought up in Saudi Arabia) sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Are you an illiterate muslim? And do you still long for more effective muslim attacks on Jews?

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and sharia in common.

Islam's "peaceful" attacks

Islam can never be peaceful. When islam is a "peaceful religion" it's dead because it then looses its attacking power and evil allure. Islam means submission, i.e. to put others down by referring to a third party for judgment or decision. This "third party" is called Allah but because he is never accessible the real "third person" is the licenced authority of being a true muslim against infidels. Although submission can be produced in different ways, e.g. by murdering the infidel or the infidel converting, what is always necessary is aggressive attack, the very soul of islam. As juat one example of islam's variety of attack strategies one may take the simple fact that the reproductive math in islam gives no peace for anything else than a muslim man. It's the muslim man who can marry whoever and who transfers the inevitable muslimhood of the sons while the daughters are forbidden to marry non muslim. Just make a game out of such rules and you will see it's inevitable that the other part will loose.

It's truly extremist and deeply immoral to support such an intolerant attacking racist sexist totalitarian hate ideology!





Islam's attack on little girls


Islam didn't invent the sword. So does this mean that islam has nothing to do with it when a muslim murders an "infidel" with a sword in accordance to the Koran, islamic law etc? That Muhammad's murderous attacks on Jews and other non-muslims had nothing to do with islam?

Female genital mutilation wasn't invented by islam (actually nothing has been invented by islam except the institutionalized jihad/rapetivism axis). However, it's among muslims it's by far most prevalent. In the biggest muslim country Indonesia it's practically 100%.

Susanne Mubarak, former Egyptian president's wife (2007): It is a flagrant example of continued physical and psychological violence against children which must stop.

Klevius: It was the hated western supported Mubarak regime that legislated against FGM in Egypt. Yet it seems to no effect. In Egypt more than 90% of muslim women have mutilated genitals. This 12 year old Egyptian girl, Sohair al-Bata'a, died after genital mutilation. Family and doctor freed from any responsibility. As was islam! The question should not be: What went wrong?

The question should be: Why did they do it to her?


Islam tends to attract evil people and evil deeds while those more ignorant about islam are usually less religiously evil yet prone to defend 'their faith' (read the immoral of their faith) against the West (read against Human Rights equality).


According to most surveys those who profess no religion or self-identify as a-theist or agnostic are more likely to be white or East Asian and less likely to be black, Mideasterner, West/South East Asian.

Klevius advice for an immediate and considerable reduction of so called "muslim extremists" i.e. true muslims: Stop telling lies about islam to our kids! The average muslim or non-muslim young student doesn't know the difference between sharia and Human Rights despite the troublesome fact that they all have been force fed with a massive propaganda education about islam!

Klevius (1992): Whereas God-religions (i.e. not to be confused with Buddhism, Shintoism, Taoism etc a-theist moral teachings) are mirrors, true moral ideologies are windows. And the ultimate moral window is the so called Negative Human Rights. Don't look so confused - look it up!

Also educate yourself with a comparison of OIC's disgusting sharia declaration.





.

No comments: