Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Borderline muslims and islam




BBC reports that 'some teachers' have stopped sex segragating etc islamofascist (i.e. against Human Rights) behavior in UK schools


Martin Parsons: It is not for non Muslims to say what is or is not a ‘true’ interpretation of Islam

Klevius: What utter childish nonsense from this "faith phd"! A spectrum of interpretations of islam by muslims can only be defined by contrasting to non muslims. And because muslims call each other "non muslims" (compare the case of Sayeeda Warsi calling muslims 'idiots') then the only ones capable of defining islam have to be non muslims. Just as the only ones capable of critically scrutinizing/researching islam have to be Atheists. However, with a phd in islamism Martin Parsons has excluded himself from understanding islam. He pretends being a non-muslim but is more of a muslim than most muslims.

How does he differ from BBC's muslim presenter Mishal Husain?! 2012 Martin Parsons wrote: Stopping the spread of sharia should be central to British foreign policy!

Klevius question: How does that comply with all muslims sharia organization OIC? A muslim without Sharia is a non-muslim, but unlike non-muslims s/he is also an apostate, i.e. someone who, according toi islam, has committed the worst of crimes. And although not all earthly islam representatives may propose the death sentence, Allah still considers it the worst of crimes.

Oh sorry about that, I forgot that Allah doesn't exist in islam other than as an excuse for earthly atrocities.




Or isn't Mishal Husain a muslim at all? Only a so called "cultural muslim", i.e. an apostate.



Mishal Husain's power position combined with her reluctance to take a stance about islam and Sharia (other than implying that islamic terrorists haven't killed enough Jews in Israel) and her muslimhood makes her the perfect example of a borderline muslim who paves the way for islamic atrocities worldwide while pretending not to be a crucial part of it

 

No wonder that uneducated (about islam and its violation of Human Rights) girls don't understand what a threat islam (and OIC) constitutes to them (many of them do understand it later on in life but then it's too late for them and therefore they usually impose the same on their daughters so not to feel ashamed themselves).

The logic here inevitably makes BBC's Mishal Husain an utter and disgusting hypocrite and bigot no matter whether she is a muslim or an apostate. Sorry about that all of you who have blindfolded yourselves from this important aspect.



.

No comments: