Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are Atheists (i.e. not "believing" in a "god"*). That fact paves the way for Human Rights equality. Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women) Human Rights equality.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, January 17, 2014

Why hasn't BBC's islamofascist Sharia supporter Mishal Husain told the Brits about the Saudi "king" & Co extreme Human Rights violations?

Saudi islam - a puke on Human Rights

Peter Klevius: Could it be because Sharia is against UN's Universal Human Rights Declaration from 1948, and Mishal Husain* doesn't want to mention it because then she would have to admit she shares the same islamofascist agenda or, alternatively, is no muslim at all! And by sharing Klevius doesn't mean any particular cruel aspects of sentencing or treatment of women and "infidels" but the very fault line between the bedrock of Human Rights and islam's Sharia swamp.

 * This, of course, applies to every "Mishal Husain" out there!

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain, Michael Adebolajo
and their Saudi Sharia master Iyad Madani

Islam's two legs: Jihad and Sharia enslavement

Not a single one serious historian can dispute the fact that the origin of islam was a barbaric bloody looting attack on the surrounding world. But out of PC (cowardiness) they may try to avoid the question by all means. And if they dare mentioning Andalus, just tell them that it was the ugliest of all because of the extreme complicity by Jews and Christians about islam's main business idea, slaves. "Tolerance" was a synonym for slave Sharia finance, which is islam's other "peaceful" leg.

Proposing Human Rights is a crime against islam and its Sharia - consider this while reading the below!

The founders of Adala (Justice) Center for Human Rights in Saudi Arabia, represented by Human Rights activists Sadek al-Ramadan applied for a permit to establish the center as a non-governmental foundation. Adala's statement of aims refers to the principles and standards of international humanitarian law. However, it was dismissed "since it is evidently known that many placed ordinances do not comply with the Islamic Shari'a", and Article 7 of Saudi Arabia's Basic Law which states:
"Government in Saudi Arabia derives power from the Holy Quran and the Prophet's tradition."

Here's the motivation: it is also proved that as mentioned in the basic system of the center in the first paragraph of the definition that it is a civil organization that aims to support and spread the culture of human rights in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and also it contradicts with what the first article of the list of organizations and charity institutes where it stated that "it is prohibited to license an organization if its basic system contains provisions that contradict with this list or other systems or the general law or incompatible with societal ethics" , and looking at the goals of the center in plaintiff position we see it has stated the following: 1- Striving to strengthening and spread the culture of human rights and supporting activists and defenders working in the field of rights and coordinate with their efforts. 2- Making the citizens recognize their rights and duties and the importance of independent civil society institutes and insuring the concept of the authority of the law in developing the society, and motivating and supporting them in establishing these institutes and actively participating in them. 3- Defining cases of human rights at rights institutes. 4- Participation in coordinating and evolving the efforts of individuals and groups that adopt defending human rights. 5- Working on building and evolving a basic platform for rights work, and participating in building a reservoir of experience and the necessary personnel. And by looking at the goals of the Human Rights committee issued by royal decision number (207) on 8/8/1426 H., we find that it stated the following: the committee aims to preserve human rights and strengthen it in accordance to international human rights standards in all fields, and spread awareness of it and participating in ensuring its practice in light of the rules of the Islamic dogma (Shari'a).

Some additional background

On December 28, 2009 the unlicensed Civil and Political Rights Association (ACPRA) appealed to King Abdullah in an open letter to order the release from prison of 73-year old, well-known Human Rights activist, Suliman Al-Reshoudi. The letter claimed that Al-Reshoudi, a former judge, is suffering "severe physical and psychological torture." A copy of the letter was circulated by ACPRA via e-mail to embassies in Saudi Arabia and abroad, as well as to members of the press and to Human Rights organizations. The letter has been widely circulated via the internet and received press coverage from Reuters and the BBC but not from any media outlets in Saudi Arabia. END SUMMARY. 2. (SBU) The ACPRA's December 28 open letter to King Abdullah said ACPRA had "confirmed information" that Judge Al-Reshoudi had been subjected to severe physical and psychological torture during his three years in solitary confinement. Most recently, according to the letter, Judge Al-Reshoudi's two feet were tied up with two separate chains, one tying the two feet together, the other tying the feet to the bed frame. During the day, the letter reported, the 73-year old is forced into a sitting position where he cannot relax or lie down and at night his feet are in shackles, depriving him of sleep. The letter described how Judge Al-Reshoudi's wife and two young toddlers "burst into tears" upon seeing him during a recent prison visit. ACPRA believes the treatment is in retaliation for Judge Al-Reshoudi's intention of joining ACPRA and is intended to send a threatening message to other Human Rights activists. 3. (SBU) The letter describes Judge Al-Reshoudi as a widely-known Human Rights defender who had signed political reform petitions demanding a national constitution, rights for freedom of assembly, and the establishment of civil society institutions. It comments that if the Interior Ministry could get away with inflicting "severe brutalities on activists," it could certainly get away with "torturing ordinary Saudis." The letter asked "what kind of message is the Interior Ministry sending to Judge Al-Reshoudi's "young followers who admire his ideas of peaceful activities?" 4. (SBU) The open letter calls for King Abdullah's intervention, challenging him to "prove his genuine intentions" by immediately releasing all political prisoners and bringing those involved in torture (from the Ministry of Interior) to justice. The document names the following political prisoners: Professor Abdulrahman Al-Shomairi; Ali Khosifan Al-Qarni; Mousa Al-Qarni; Professor Saud Al-Hashemi; Fahd Al-Qurashi; Abdulrahman Bin Sadi; Saifaldeen Faisal Al-Sherif; and Mansour Salim Al-Otha. Some of these activists have been detained since February 2007, when internal security police in Jeddah and Medina arrested Isam Basrawi and nine others with allegations that the activists were financing terrorism outside of the KSA. Isam Basrawi was released for health reasons in September 2007. BACKGROUND ON ACPRA ------------------- 5. (SBU) The ACPRA was founded on October 12, 2009 with the objectives of promoting Human Rights awareness in Saudi culture and of educating citizens on basic freedoms as prescribed by the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, according to its charter. The ACPRA is not licensed. (Note: Other rights organizations such as the Human Rights First Society, have had their applications for licenses languish for years due to alleged legal shortcomings of either the application or the organization.) 6. (SBU) ACPRA announced its presence as an organization via an open letter to King Abdullah. The organization has a website, which is currently blocked in the KSA, at The eleven founding members of the organization are academics and Human Rights activists, including Professor Abdulkareem Yousef Al-Khathar, Professor of Islamic Jurisprudence at Qassim University; Prof. Abdullah H. Al-Hamid; Fahad Abdulaziz Ali Al-Orani; Fowzan Mohsen Al-Harbi; Easa Hamid Al-Hamid; Mhana Mohammed Al-Faleh; Dr. Mohammad Fahad Al-Qahtani; Mohammad Fahad Almohaisen; Mohammed Saleh Albejadi; and Saud Ahmed Aldoughaither. ACPRA founder Mohammad Al-Qahtani is an Assistant Professor of Economics at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Institute of Diplomatic Studies and enjoys high visibility, a position that affords him some protection from government harassment. RIYADH 00000069 002.2 OF 002 (although he has been arrested before). COMMENT ------- 7. (SBU) The Embassy cannot corroborate the claims of torture in the ACPRA letter. However, while the Saudi government has made attempts to curb and control torture in Saudi prisons, occasional claims of torture, such as this one, persist. ACPRA's rare open letter was notable for bringing public attention to a matter most Saudis prefer to ignore. That it has thus far been tolerated suggests a willingness on the part of the SAG to expand - ever so slightly - the limits of public debate on such subjects. SMITH 

Do the muslim test by asking them if they are against Human Rights. If they are not they are no real muslims, according to OIC and every possible form of Sharia! Don't get surprised if many of them weren't even aware of it.

tags: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain, Michael Adebolajo, Iyad Madani, OIC,


No comments: