Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Most people today are A(mono)theists, i.e. not "believing" in an impossible "one god"*. Such a "collective god" would mean equally many personal "gods" as there are believers/interpretors. "Monotheisms" are for racist/sexist movements - not for individuals. Human Rights are for individuals living among individuals with same rights.

Religion always means a total or partial reduction of some people's (e.g. women''s) Human Rights equality.

Being against A(mono)theism must be categorized as contempt of basic Human Rights equality because "monotheists" have doctrines which can't comply with basic Human Rights equality.
Klevius moral formula is a bedrock you can't beat:

1 There's no absolute and fixed moral in a dynamic society.

2 Therefor we have to repeatedly agree on a minimum moral and equality for all.

3 In doing so we are logically forced to approve of negative Human Rights, i.e. not to impose restrictions other than necessary in a democracy based on as much freedom as possible for all individuals - no matter of sex, race etc. And, for the truly dumb ones, do note that this definition excludes the freedom to restrict freedom.

* Though some people keep calling their own racist/sexist "interpretation" as "god's/allah's will").

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

Sharia and weaponry keeps Brexit-UK in EU - with leaking borders and against the will of the people

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

While EU closes internal borders it opens external ones.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

"Brits" who are racist against EU citizens but dare not criticize muslims - here's your passport.

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

Welcoming UK's main security threat - and committing treason against the will of the people

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

The ultimate treason against people in England, Ireland and Scotland

True Brits for the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and against Human Rights

Klevius: Face it, Wikipedia, BBC etc. fake media - Finland was first in the world with full suffrag

The network that reignited evil Human Rightsphobic sharia islam via al-Saud

Human Rightsphobe Jacob Rees-Mogg and BBC News crack jokes about Germans lacking humour

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

Klevius "islamophobia" CV

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights for girls/women rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

Racist Theresa May is robbing EU citizens of their Human Rights

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

This (via Saudi sharia finance) is the main threat to your Human Rights

Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site  - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

What is "islamophobia"?

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Friday, January 17, 2014

Why hasn't BBC's islamofascist Sharia supporter Mishal Husain told the Brits about the Saudi "king" & Co extreme Human Rights violations?

Saudi islam - a puke on Human Rights

Peter Klevius: Could it be because Sharia is against UN's Universal Human Rights Declaration from 1948, and Mishal Husain* doesn't want to mention it because then she would have to admit she shares the same islamofascist agenda or, alternatively, is no muslim at all! And by sharing Klevius doesn't mean any particular cruel aspects of sentencing or treatment of women and "infidels" but the very fault line between the bedrock of Human Rights and islam's Sharia swamp.

 * This, of course, applies to every "Mishal Husain" out there!

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain, Michael Adebolajo
and their Saudi Sharia master Iyad Madani

Islam's two legs: Jihad and Sharia enslavement

Not a single one serious historian can dispute the fact that the origin of islam was a barbaric bloody looting attack on the surrounding world. But out of PC (cowardiness) they may try to avoid the question by all means. And if they dare mentioning Andalus, just tell them that it was the ugliest of all because of the extreme complicity by Jews and Christians about islam's main business idea, slaves. "Tolerance" was a synonym for slave Sharia finance, which is islam's other "peaceful" leg.

Proposing Human Rights is a crime against islam and its Sharia - consider this while reading the below!

The founders of Adala (Justice) Center for Human Rights in Saudi Arabia, represented by Human Rights activists Sadek al-Ramadan applied for a permit to establish the center as a non-governmental foundation. Adala's statement of aims refers to the principles and standards of international humanitarian law. However, it was dismissed "since it is evidently known that many placed ordinances do not comply with the Islamic Shari'a", and Article 7 of Saudi Arabia's Basic Law which states:
"Government in Saudi Arabia derives power from the Holy Quran and the Prophet's tradition."

Here's the motivation: it is also proved that as mentioned in the basic system of the center in the first paragraph of the definition that it is a civil organization that aims to support and spread the culture of human rights in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and also it contradicts with what the first article of the list of organizations and charity institutes where it stated that "it is prohibited to license an organization if its basic system contains provisions that contradict with this list or other systems or the general law or incompatible with societal ethics" , and looking at the goals of the center in plaintiff position we see it has stated the following: 1- Striving to strengthening and spread the culture of human rights and supporting activists and defenders working in the field of rights and coordinate with their efforts. 2- Making the citizens recognize their rights and duties and the importance of independent civil society institutes and insuring the concept of the authority of the law in developing the society, and motivating and supporting them in establishing these institutes and actively participating in them. 3- Defining cases of human rights at rights institutes. 4- Participation in coordinating and evolving the efforts of individuals and groups that adopt defending human rights. 5- Working on building and evolving a basic platform for rights work, and participating in building a reservoir of experience and the necessary personnel. And by looking at the goals of the Human Rights committee issued by royal decision number (207) on 8/8/1426 H., we find that it stated the following: the committee aims to preserve human rights and strengthen it in accordance to international human rights standards in all fields, and spread awareness of it and participating in ensuring its practice in light of the rules of the Islamic dogma (Shari'a).

Some additional background

On December 28, 2009 the unlicensed Civil and Political Rights Association (ACPRA) appealed to King Abdullah in an open letter to order the release from prison of 73-year old, well-known Human Rights activist, Suliman Al-Reshoudi. The letter claimed that Al-Reshoudi, a former judge, is suffering "severe physical and psychological torture." A copy of the letter was circulated by ACPRA via e-mail to embassies in Saudi Arabia and abroad, as well as to members of the press and to Human Rights organizations. The letter has been widely circulated via the internet and received press coverage from Reuters and the BBC but not from any media outlets in Saudi Arabia. END SUMMARY. 2. (SBU) The ACPRA's December 28 open letter to King Abdullah said ACPRA had "confirmed information" that Judge Al-Reshoudi had been subjected to severe physical and psychological torture during his three years in solitary confinement. Most recently, according to the letter, Judge Al-Reshoudi's two feet were tied up with two separate chains, one tying the two feet together, the other tying the feet to the bed frame. During the day, the letter reported, the 73-year old is forced into a sitting position where he cannot relax or lie down and at night his feet are in shackles, depriving him of sleep. The letter described how Judge Al-Reshoudi's wife and two young toddlers "burst into tears" upon seeing him during a recent prison visit. ACPRA believes the treatment is in retaliation for Judge Al-Reshoudi's intention of joining ACPRA and is intended to send a threatening message to other Human Rights activists. 3. (SBU) The letter describes Judge Al-Reshoudi as a widely-known Human Rights defender who had signed political reform petitions demanding a national constitution, rights for freedom of assembly, and the establishment of civil society institutions. It comments that if the Interior Ministry could get away with inflicting "severe brutalities on activists," it could certainly get away with "torturing ordinary Saudis." The letter asked "what kind of message is the Interior Ministry sending to Judge Al-Reshoudi's "young followers who admire his ideas of peaceful activities?" 4. (SBU) The open letter calls for King Abdullah's intervention, challenging him to "prove his genuine intentions" by immediately releasing all political prisoners and bringing those involved in torture (from the Ministry of Interior) to justice. The document names the following political prisoners: Professor Abdulrahman Al-Shomairi; Ali Khosifan Al-Qarni; Mousa Al-Qarni; Professor Saud Al-Hashemi; Fahd Al-Qurashi; Abdulrahman Bin Sadi; Saifaldeen Faisal Al-Sherif; and Mansour Salim Al-Otha. Some of these activists have been detained since February 2007, when internal security police in Jeddah and Medina arrested Isam Basrawi and nine others with allegations that the activists were financing terrorism outside of the KSA. Isam Basrawi was released for health reasons in September 2007. BACKGROUND ON ACPRA ------------------- 5. (SBU) The ACPRA was founded on October 12, 2009 with the objectives of promoting Human Rights awareness in Saudi culture and of educating citizens on basic freedoms as prescribed by the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights, according to its charter. The ACPRA is not licensed. (Note: Other rights organizations such as the Human Rights First Society, have had their applications for licenses languish for years due to alleged legal shortcomings of either the application or the organization.) 6. (SBU) ACPRA announced its presence as an organization via an open letter to King Abdullah. The organization has a website, which is currently blocked in the KSA, at The eleven founding members of the organization are academics and Human Rights activists, including Professor Abdulkareem Yousef Al-Khathar, Professor of Islamic Jurisprudence at Qassim University; Prof. Abdullah H. Al-Hamid; Fahad Abdulaziz Ali Al-Orani; Fowzan Mohsen Al-Harbi; Easa Hamid Al-Hamid; Mhana Mohammed Al-Faleh; Dr. Mohammad Fahad Al-Qahtani; Mohammad Fahad Almohaisen; Mohammed Saleh Albejadi; and Saud Ahmed Aldoughaither. ACPRA founder Mohammad Al-Qahtani is an Assistant Professor of Economics at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Institute of Diplomatic Studies and enjoys high visibility, a position that affords him some protection from government harassment. RIYADH 00000069 002.2 OF 002 (although he has been arrested before). COMMENT ------- 7. (SBU) The Embassy cannot corroborate the claims of torture in the ACPRA letter. However, while the Saudi government has made attempts to curb and control torture in Saudi prisons, occasional claims of torture, such as this one, persist. ACPRA's rare open letter was notable for bringing public attention to a matter most Saudis prefer to ignore. That it has thus far been tolerated suggests a willingness on the part of the SAG to expand - ever so slightly - the limits of public debate on such subjects. SMITH 

Do the muslim test by asking them if they are against Human Rights. If they are not they are no real muslims, according to OIC and every possible form of Sharia! Don't get surprised if many of them weren't even aware of it.

tags: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain, Michael Adebolajo, Iyad Madani, OIC,


No comments: