Negative Human Rights for a Positive Human Future

Definition of Negative Human Rights - i.e. the very foundation of the freedom part of the anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948.

Support Klevius' Atheist anti-fascism against islamofascism

This is what BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain "forgot" to report. Mishal grew up in the very same theocratic medieval dictatorship which now harbors and rules all muslims world organization OIC and its Human Rights violating sharia. While also spreading islamic hatred over the world through a variety of channels.

Klevius to dumb (or just evil) alt-left "antifa" people who support the worst of Human Rights violating evil:

True anti-fascism in its purest form is laid down in the Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. Islam (OIC) has in UN decided to abandon the most basic of these rights (the so called negative Human Rights).

Fascism is, according to Google's top hit, "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation*, and forcible suppression of opposition." 23 Aug 2017

So let's face islam with this definition.

A political philosophy, movement, or regime (islam) that exalts nation (Umma) and often race (muslims) above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government (Koran text/Mohammad's example) headed by a dictatorial leader (the caliph - e.g. the Saudi based OIC's Saudi leader), severe economic and social regimentation* (sharia), and forcible suppression of opposition (apostasy ban against muslims wanting to leave islam, and demonizing defenders of Human Rights by calling them "islamophobes").

And islamofascism gets away with it by calling itself a religion and thereby being protected by those very Human Rights it opposes.

* According to Cambridge dictionary, "extreme organization and control of people".

Klevius to Mueller (who opposed investigation of Saudi 9/11): Check Saudi connections/influence!

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?
Is the islamofascist Saudi dictator "prince" Mohammad bin Salman the world's most dangerous man?

Is Mrs Theresa May digging a miserable "British" sharia "empire" under the Brexit cliff?

Mrs May plays sharia with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - skipping Human Rights. Right?

Saudi islamofascism attacks Buddhists - again and again - backed by Mrs May.

When will the world finally turn on the hateful Saudi dictator family - rather than on its victims?

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses while FEEding Lnd
The islamofascist Saudi dictator family spreading its islamist hate and losses over you

How an organization of islamic crimes (OIC) violates Human Rights

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slaves to Abbasid (ca 750)

Human Rights is diversity - sharia is the opposite

The evil of Sharia islam is what makes it incompatible with Negative Human Rights (i.e. why islamic OIC violates Human Rights by replacing them with Sharia, hence excluding women and non-muslims from equality). The evil of islam and its origin may be easier to grasp with historical examples, e.g. the Origin of Vikings.

It's racism and sexism even if proposed by a "god"! Klevius altruistic virtual volunteering for the world community in defense of Universal Human Rights . Yes, I know, it's unfair. Klevius vs islam, i.e. Universal Human Rights vs Sharia (OIC) racism/sexism! Of course Klevius will win. The question is just how long we should allow the dying beast to make people suffer. (Negative) Human Rights is not a ”Western” invention! It’s where you end up when you abandon racism and sexism, idiot! After you have abandoned islam! Your confused islamophilia and ignorance about Human Rights make YOU an accomplice to islam's crimes! Whereas Human Rights work as egalitarian and universal traffic rules (no matter who you are or what you drive you have the same rights as everyone else) islam/Sharia differs between muslim men and the rest (women and "infidels")!

Ask yourself, why can't racist islam (OIC) accept Human Rights? The answer reveals the difference between totalitarianism and freedom. And even if everyone converted to islam we'd still have Sharia sexism.
Have you noticed that when the history of slavery is (PC) debated islam is always excluded/excused? Atlantic slave trade and Roman slaves are eagerly mentioned while the world's by far worst, longest and most extensive one is blinked, as is the fact that islam not only sanctions slavery but is itself built on slavery and sex slavery (rapetivism)! The core idea of islam is the most thoroughly elaborated parasitism ever, i.e. what in 1400 yrs has made it the by far worst crime ever. But thanks to islamic teachings muslims are kept extremely ignorant about the evil origin of islam (institutionalized parasitism based on slave finance, rapetivism and pillage). Ohlig: The first two "islamic" centuries lie in the shadows of history. Klevius: There was no islam or islamic Mohammad (that's why the Saudis have levelled Mohammad's "grave" etc), only the evil murdering, pillaging and raping Aramaic-Arabic Jewish("Christian") led illiterate Arab thugs chasing for booty and sex. The "success" of this formula became later institutionalized and codified as a one way (Koran/Sharia) moral excuse (Allah) for further racist/sexist genocides. The bedrock and currency of this system was racist slavery. However, with Enlightenment the new idea of individual (negative) Human Rights emerged (incl. abolishing of slavery) and were, much later (1948), written down in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights according to which everyone is equal no matter of sex, beliefs etc. Just like in traffic! But unlike traffic rules no one really seems to care about guarding our most precious asset as human beings. Instead racist sexist islamofascism (OIC and the Cairo Sharia declaration) is protected by Human Rights while they strive to undermine and eventually destroy these Human Rights! And most people don't seem to get it. Always remember, there is no islam without Human Rights violating racist/sexist Sharia. So a "vote" for Sharia-islam is AGAINST democracy and the freedom part of Human Rights!

Sayeeda Warsi (UK's non-elected OIC/Sharia politician) in essence doesn't differ from those muslim Saudi women who approve of sex slavery etc, other than that she is either ignorant or a traitor (against democracy and Human Rights) of the worst kind.

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Audi then built by Jewish slaves - today dangerous quality problems

Myth vs Truth

Japan's Hayabusa landed and returned to Earth many years before Europe's Rosetta failed to do so.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Muslim Human-rights-phobia (Sharia) is the other side of the fascist coin


We need a European Spring against fascist islam - so not to repeat what happened some 70 years ago!




Nothing can be more fascist than islam! A totalitarian racist/sexist ideology that cannot accept basic Human Rights and which makes it extremely hard for muslims to leave the "faith" because of its apostasy ban and fascist organization (e.g. Saudi and Sharia based OIC which now more or less rules the UN that was created to stop it).

And our worst enemies are some of our own politicians and their connections with the worst scumbugs you can imagine.





Ha Ha "islamophobia"













Patrick Condell is an English writer, political commentator, comedian and atheist. internet personality. He performed alternative comedy shows during the 1980s and 1990s in the United Kingdom, and won a Time Out Comedy Award in 1991. He was also a regular panelist on BBC Radio 1′s “Loose Talk”. As of March 2013, Pat Condell’s YouTube channel has over 177,902 subscribers and 44 million video views.


Sayeeda Warsi is probably now the worst threat to the Brits' Human Rights



Douglas Murray: According to the Home Office if you are a non-Muslim and you make the following statement your presence will be deemed ‘not conducive to the public good’ and you will be barred from entering the United Kingdom:

    ‘It [Islam] is a religion and a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society. Because of media and general government unwillingness to face the sources of Islamic terrorism these things remain largely unknown.’

If, on the other hand, you are a Muslim and you say the following then the UK government has no problem with you, and you can come in to the UK to do a speaking tour:

    ‘Devotion to Jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer.’

In welcoming the decision to ban the first speaker, rather than the second, Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, has said:

    ‘The UK should never become a stage for inflammatory speakers who promote hate.’

Too late, Keith.  Too late.



Some comments on this:


Avatar
chan chan • 2 days ago

Cameron and his dhimmi government once again enforcing shari'ah law.
60

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Julieann Carter • 2 days ago

Gosh! This is terrible! Why? Why? Why? There's no good reason! How utterly disturbing and sinister is this malicious and cowardly 'affirmative action'. Stand alone Muslims in government appear to be more powerful and influential than the rest of parliament combined. That what it seems like. Bloody creepy. You really have to question the motivation of Keith Vaz in wishing to bar those who would speak out
truthfully against violent Islam (as opposed to 'peaceful Islam')? I thought we were all supposed to be on the same side here?
57

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Marky_D • 2 days ago

Wasn't that long ago I was hoping Theresa May would oust Cameron. Are there absolutely no free speech loving conservatives in the Conservative party any more?
Presumably Theresa May would ban those who came back from Nurembourg with scaremongering stories about that nice Mr Hitler and his National Socialist party...
55

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
retundario • 2 days ago

This is the most outrageous decision, and I will not vote for LibLabCon as a matter of principal because of it. Not only is it grossly unfair, it is also just stupidly dangerous, in the sense that many people are so disgusted and fed up with the UK political class's blatantly far (far, far, far) stronger repression of British people's right to express things from our ethnic point-of-view, as compared to the ultra-liberalism that applies to ethnic hatred against us and claims to Britishness from non-whites.
80 1

Reply

Share ›

Avatar
Old Fox • a day ago

The double standard to which you refer has been in place for many years. It arises from the "anti-racist" establishment's commitment to anti-white racism. Under the term's of this belief, all whites are collectively guilty for the alleged crimes of white Europe across recorded time. This of course is a form of collective guilt, one of the pillars of antisemitism. It also ignores inconvenient facts such as the Islamic slave trade, the involvement of black African chiefs in the Atlantic slave trade and the enslavement of more than a million white Europeans by the Ottoman Sultan. As a result of this belief only whites or those friendly to "white" values and society, such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali, are considered guilty of "hate-speech" or worse, because the rest of the world is merely giving vent to the just rage of the "oppressed". Why do you think the sexual exploitation of white girls by Pakistani perverts in northern England is greeted with such bland sang-froid? Why do you think our so-called "liberals" are so reluctant to highlight Islamic persecution of Christians and others across the middle east and so eager to prattle about "Islamophobia" in the west? Why do you think they have been so happy to flood Europe's heartlands with hostile newcomers - often from Islamic countries? Our ruling elite is in the grip of a morbid, self-hating attitude which heralds the persecution and perhaps the holocaust of European peoples. Unless we can overthrow these criminally treacherous scum we are heading for an unimaginable catastrophe.





The pic below illustrates at least two things: 1) How fascism hides behind gas, and 2) how islam and sex segregation (apartheid) are synonyms.

And sadly, Peter Klevius still seems to be the web's by far best informed (and intelligent enough) auctority on sex segregation. He feels quite alone though* so please come up with some competition. However, keep in mind that he has already long since eaten and burped both Judith Butler and Pierre Bourdieu. And he is a proud Atheist and therefore not vulnerable for "monotheistic" sexism.

* except, of course, that he is supported by the whole world in its inevitable march towards de-sex segregation. Compare his Demand for Resources (1981, and in book format 1992), Daughters of the Social State (1994), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Warning for Feminism (1998), and http://klevius.info/pathologicalsymbiosis.html (2004). Just to name a few.


Qatar is a main hub (together with Saudi Arabia and some other muslim states)  for the spreading of islamic hatred and Human-rights-phobia (Sharia)


How many have muslim fascists murdered, raped and tortured in Libya, Syria and elsewhere?

Having anything to do with them can only be excused with ignorance!








No comments: